Cargando…
Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
Ultrasound (US) is an important imaging tool for skeletal muscle analysis. The advantages of US include point-of-care access, real-time imaging, cost-effectiveness, and absence of ionizing radiation. However, US can be highly dependent on the operator and/or US system, and a portion of the potential...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104763 |
_version_ | 1785049708743360512 |
---|---|
author | Ashir, Aria Jerban, Saeed Barrère, Victor Wu, Yuanshan Shah, Sameer B. Andre, Michael P. Chang, Eric Y. |
author_facet | Ashir, Aria Jerban, Saeed Barrère, Victor Wu, Yuanshan Shah, Sameer B. Andre, Michael P. Chang, Eric Y. |
author_sort | Ashir, Aria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ultrasound (US) is an important imaging tool for skeletal muscle analysis. The advantages of US include point-of-care access, real-time imaging, cost-effectiveness, and absence of ionizing radiation. However, US can be highly dependent on the operator and/or US system, and a portion of the potentially useful information carried by raw sonographic data is discarded in image formation for routine qualitative US. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods provide analysis of the raw or post-processed data, revealing additional information about normal tissue structure and disease status. There are four QUS categories that can be used on muscle and are important to review. First, quantitative data derived from B-mode images can help determine the macrostructural anatomy and microstructural morphology of muscle tissues. Second, US elastography can provide information about muscle elasticity or stiffness through strain elastography or shear wave elastography (SWE). Strain elastography measures the induced tissue strain caused either by internal or external compression by tracking tissue displacement with detectable speckle in B-mode images of the examined tissue. SWE measures the speed of induced shear waves traveling through the tissue to estimate the tissue elasticity. These shear waves may be produced using external mechanical vibrations or internal “push pulse” ultrasound stimuli. Third, raw radiofrequency signal analyses provide estimates of fundamental tissue parameters, such as the speed of sound, attenuation coefficient, and backscatter coefficient, which correspond to information about muscle tissue microstructure and composition. Lastly, envelope statistical analyses apply various probability distributions to estimate the number density of scatterers and quantify coherent to incoherent signals, thus providing information about microstructural properties of muscle tissue. This review will examine these QUS techniques, published results on QUS evaluation of skeletal muscles, and the strengths and limitations of QUS in skeletal muscle analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10222479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102224792023-05-28 Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review Ashir, Aria Jerban, Saeed Barrère, Victor Wu, Yuanshan Shah, Sameer B. Andre, Michael P. Chang, Eric Y. Sensors (Basel) Review Ultrasound (US) is an important imaging tool for skeletal muscle analysis. The advantages of US include point-of-care access, real-time imaging, cost-effectiveness, and absence of ionizing radiation. However, US can be highly dependent on the operator and/or US system, and a portion of the potentially useful information carried by raw sonographic data is discarded in image formation for routine qualitative US. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods provide analysis of the raw or post-processed data, revealing additional information about normal tissue structure and disease status. There are four QUS categories that can be used on muscle and are important to review. First, quantitative data derived from B-mode images can help determine the macrostructural anatomy and microstructural morphology of muscle tissues. Second, US elastography can provide information about muscle elasticity or stiffness through strain elastography or shear wave elastography (SWE). Strain elastography measures the induced tissue strain caused either by internal or external compression by tracking tissue displacement with detectable speckle in B-mode images of the examined tissue. SWE measures the speed of induced shear waves traveling through the tissue to estimate the tissue elasticity. These shear waves may be produced using external mechanical vibrations or internal “push pulse” ultrasound stimuli. Third, raw radiofrequency signal analyses provide estimates of fundamental tissue parameters, such as the speed of sound, attenuation coefficient, and backscatter coefficient, which correspond to information about muscle tissue microstructure and composition. Lastly, envelope statistical analyses apply various probability distributions to estimate the number density of scatterers and quantify coherent to incoherent signals, thus providing information about microstructural properties of muscle tissue. This review will examine these QUS techniques, published results on QUS evaluation of skeletal muscles, and the strengths and limitations of QUS in skeletal muscle analysis. MDPI 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10222479/ /pubmed/37430678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104763 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ashir, Aria Jerban, Saeed Barrère, Victor Wu, Yuanshan Shah, Sameer B. Andre, Michael P. Chang, Eric Y. Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review |
title | Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review |
title_full | Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review |
title_fullStr | Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review |
title_short | Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review |
title_sort | skeletal muscle assessment using quantitative ultrasound: a narrative review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37430678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23104763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ashiraria skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview AT jerbansaeed skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview AT barrerevictor skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview AT wuyuanshan skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview AT shahsameerb skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview AT andremichaelp skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview AT changericy skeletalmuscleassessmentusingquantitativeultrasoundanarrativereview |