Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Lactococcus petauri is an important emergent bacterial pathogen of salmonids in the USA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the protection conferred to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) against L. petauri by formalin-killed vaccines in immersion and injectable forms, as well as the enhanced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Ruyter, Tryssa, Littman, Eric, Yazdi, Zeinab, Adkison, Mark, Camus, Alvin, Yun, Susan, Welch, Timothy J., Keleher, William R., Soto, Esteban
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37242302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050632
_version_ 1785049790553260032
author de Ruyter, Tryssa
Littman, Eric
Yazdi, Zeinab
Adkison, Mark
Camus, Alvin
Yun, Susan
Welch, Timothy J.
Keleher, William R.
Soto, Esteban
author_facet de Ruyter, Tryssa
Littman, Eric
Yazdi, Zeinab
Adkison, Mark
Camus, Alvin
Yun, Susan
Welch, Timothy J.
Keleher, William R.
Soto, Esteban
author_sort de Ruyter, Tryssa
collection PubMed
description Lactococcus petauri is an important emergent bacterial pathogen of salmonids in the USA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the protection conferred to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) against L. petauri by formalin-killed vaccines in immersion and injectable forms, as well as the enhanced protection afforded by booster vaccination. In the first challenge, fish were immunized via intracoelomic injection (IC) or immersion (Imm) routes alone. Approximately 418 degree days (Temperature in degree Celsius × days post-immunization) (dd) Imm, or 622 dd IC post-vaccination, fish were challenged via IC with wild-type L. petauri. In the second experiment, initial Imm vaccination was followed by booster vaccination via Imm or IC routes 273 dd post-immunization along with appropriate PBS controls. The various vaccination protocol efficacies were evaluated by challenging fish with L. petauri by cohabitation with diseased fish 399 dd post-booster administration. A relative percent survival (RPS) of 89.5% and 28% was recorded in the IC and Imm single immunization treatments, respectively. In the second study, an RPS of 97.5%, 10.2%, 2.6% and −10.1% plus approximately 0%, 50%, 20%, and 30% bacterial persistence was recorded in the Imm immunized + IC boosted, Imm immunized + mock IC boosted, Imm immunized + Imm boosted, and Imm immunized + mock Imm boosted treatments, respectively. Only the Imm immunized + IC injection boosted treatments provided significant protection when compared to unvaccinated and challenged treatments (p < 0.05). In conclusion, although both Imm and IC vaccines appear safe for trout, the inactivated Imm vaccines seem to provide only mild and temporary protection against lactococcosis; whereas IC immunized trout develop a significantly stronger protective response in both challenges.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10222813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102228132023-05-28 Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) de Ruyter, Tryssa Littman, Eric Yazdi, Zeinab Adkison, Mark Camus, Alvin Yun, Susan Welch, Timothy J. Keleher, William R. Soto, Esteban Pathogens Article Lactococcus petauri is an important emergent bacterial pathogen of salmonids in the USA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the protection conferred to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) against L. petauri by formalin-killed vaccines in immersion and injectable forms, as well as the enhanced protection afforded by booster vaccination. In the first challenge, fish were immunized via intracoelomic injection (IC) or immersion (Imm) routes alone. Approximately 418 degree days (Temperature in degree Celsius × days post-immunization) (dd) Imm, or 622 dd IC post-vaccination, fish were challenged via IC with wild-type L. petauri. In the second experiment, initial Imm vaccination was followed by booster vaccination via Imm or IC routes 273 dd post-immunization along with appropriate PBS controls. The various vaccination protocol efficacies were evaluated by challenging fish with L. petauri by cohabitation with diseased fish 399 dd post-booster administration. A relative percent survival (RPS) of 89.5% and 28% was recorded in the IC and Imm single immunization treatments, respectively. In the second study, an RPS of 97.5%, 10.2%, 2.6% and −10.1% plus approximately 0%, 50%, 20%, and 30% bacterial persistence was recorded in the Imm immunized + IC boosted, Imm immunized + mock IC boosted, Imm immunized + Imm boosted, and Imm immunized + mock Imm boosted treatments, respectively. Only the Imm immunized + IC injection boosted treatments provided significant protection when compared to unvaccinated and challenged treatments (p < 0.05). In conclusion, although both Imm and IC vaccines appear safe for trout, the inactivated Imm vaccines seem to provide only mild and temporary protection against lactococcosis; whereas IC immunized trout develop a significantly stronger protective response in both challenges. MDPI 2023-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10222813/ /pubmed/37242302 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050632 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Ruyter, Tryssa
Littman, Eric
Yazdi, Zeinab
Adkison, Mark
Camus, Alvin
Yun, Susan
Welch, Timothy J.
Keleher, William R.
Soto, Esteban
Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Booster Vaccine Efficacy by Intracoelomic Injection and Immersion with a Whole-Cell Killed Vaccine against Lactococcus petauri Infection in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
title_sort comparative evaluation of booster vaccine efficacy by intracoelomic injection and immersion with a whole-cell killed vaccine against lactococcus petauri infection in rainbow trout (oncorhynchus mykiss)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37242302
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050632
work_keys_str_mv AT deruytertryssa comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss
AT littmaneric comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss
AT yazdizeinab comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss
AT adkisonmark comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss
AT camusalvin comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss
AT yunsusan comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss
AT welchtimothyj comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss
AT keleherwilliamr comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss
AT sotoesteban comparativeevaluationofboostervaccineefficacybyintracoelomicinjectionandimmersionwithawholecellkilledvaccineagainstlactococcuspetauriinfectioninrainbowtroutoncorhynchusmykiss