Cargando…

A Competitive Study Using Electrospinning and Phase Inversion to Prepare Polymeric Membranes for Oil Removal

Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) is a popular polymer that can be made into membranes using various techniques, such as electrospinning and phase inversion. Electrospinning is a novel technique that produces nonwoven nanofiber-based membranes with highly tunable properties. In this research, electrospun PAN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diwan, Thamer, Abudi, Zaidun N., Al-Furaiji, Mustafa H., Nijmeijer, Arian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37233535
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13050474
_version_ 1785049794498002944
author Diwan, Thamer
Abudi, Zaidun N.
Al-Furaiji, Mustafa H.
Nijmeijer, Arian
author_facet Diwan, Thamer
Abudi, Zaidun N.
Al-Furaiji, Mustafa H.
Nijmeijer, Arian
author_sort Diwan, Thamer
collection PubMed
description Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) is a popular polymer that can be made into membranes using various techniques, such as electrospinning and phase inversion. Electrospinning is a novel technique that produces nonwoven nanofiber-based membranes with highly tunable properties. In this research, electrospun PAN nanofiber membranes with various concentrations (10, 12, and 14% PAN/dimethylformamide (DMF)) were prepared and compared to PAN cast membranes prepared by the phase inversion technique. All of the prepared membranes were tested for oil removal in a cross-flow filtration system. A comparison between these membranes’ surface morphology, topography, wettability, and porosity was presented and analyzed. The results showed that increasing the concentration of the PAN precursor solution increases surface roughness, hydrophilicity, and porosity and, consequently, enhances the membrane performance. However, the PAN cast membranes showed a lower water flux when the precursor solution concentration increased. In general, the electrospun PAN membranes performed better in terms of water flux and oil rejection than the cast PAN membranes. The electrospun 14% PAN/DMF membrane gave a water flux of 250 LMH and a rejection of 97% compared to the cast 14% PAN/DMF membrane, which showed a water flux of 117 LMH and 94% oil rejection. This is mainly because the nanofibrous membrane showed higher porosity, higher hydrophilicity, and higher surface roughness compared to the cast PAN membranes at the same polymer concentration. The porosity of the electrospun PAN membrane was 96%, while it was 58% for the cast 14% PAN/DMF membrane.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10222831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102228312023-05-28 A Competitive Study Using Electrospinning and Phase Inversion to Prepare Polymeric Membranes for Oil Removal Diwan, Thamer Abudi, Zaidun N. Al-Furaiji, Mustafa H. Nijmeijer, Arian Membranes (Basel) Article Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) is a popular polymer that can be made into membranes using various techniques, such as electrospinning and phase inversion. Electrospinning is a novel technique that produces nonwoven nanofiber-based membranes with highly tunable properties. In this research, electrospun PAN nanofiber membranes with various concentrations (10, 12, and 14% PAN/dimethylformamide (DMF)) were prepared and compared to PAN cast membranes prepared by the phase inversion technique. All of the prepared membranes were tested for oil removal in a cross-flow filtration system. A comparison between these membranes’ surface morphology, topography, wettability, and porosity was presented and analyzed. The results showed that increasing the concentration of the PAN precursor solution increases surface roughness, hydrophilicity, and porosity and, consequently, enhances the membrane performance. However, the PAN cast membranes showed a lower water flux when the precursor solution concentration increased. In general, the electrospun PAN membranes performed better in terms of water flux and oil rejection than the cast PAN membranes. The electrospun 14% PAN/DMF membrane gave a water flux of 250 LMH and a rejection of 97% compared to the cast 14% PAN/DMF membrane, which showed a water flux of 117 LMH and 94% oil rejection. This is mainly because the nanofibrous membrane showed higher porosity, higher hydrophilicity, and higher surface roughness compared to the cast PAN membranes at the same polymer concentration. The porosity of the electrospun PAN membrane was 96%, while it was 58% for the cast 14% PAN/DMF membrane. MDPI 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10222831/ /pubmed/37233535 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13050474 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Diwan, Thamer
Abudi, Zaidun N.
Al-Furaiji, Mustafa H.
Nijmeijer, Arian
A Competitive Study Using Electrospinning and Phase Inversion to Prepare Polymeric Membranes for Oil Removal
title A Competitive Study Using Electrospinning and Phase Inversion to Prepare Polymeric Membranes for Oil Removal
title_full A Competitive Study Using Electrospinning and Phase Inversion to Prepare Polymeric Membranes for Oil Removal
title_fullStr A Competitive Study Using Electrospinning and Phase Inversion to Prepare Polymeric Membranes for Oil Removal
title_full_unstemmed A Competitive Study Using Electrospinning and Phase Inversion to Prepare Polymeric Membranes for Oil Removal
title_short A Competitive Study Using Electrospinning and Phase Inversion to Prepare Polymeric Membranes for Oil Removal
title_sort competitive study using electrospinning and phase inversion to prepare polymeric membranes for oil removal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37233535
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes13050474
work_keys_str_mv AT diwanthamer acompetitivestudyusingelectrospinningandphaseinversiontopreparepolymericmembranesforoilremoval
AT abudizaidunn acompetitivestudyusingelectrospinningandphaseinversiontopreparepolymericmembranesforoilremoval
AT alfuraijimustafah acompetitivestudyusingelectrospinningandphaseinversiontopreparepolymericmembranesforoilremoval
AT nijmeijerarian acompetitivestudyusingelectrospinningandphaseinversiontopreparepolymericmembranesforoilremoval
AT diwanthamer competitivestudyusingelectrospinningandphaseinversiontopreparepolymericmembranesforoilremoval
AT abudizaidunn competitivestudyusingelectrospinningandphaseinversiontopreparepolymericmembranesforoilremoval
AT alfuraijimustafah competitivestudyusingelectrospinningandphaseinversiontopreparepolymericmembranesforoilremoval
AT nijmeijerarian competitivestudyusingelectrospinningandphaseinversiontopreparepolymericmembranesforoilremoval