Cargando…
Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar
The sagebrush steppe has presented increasing levels of degradation. The addition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and biochar have been suggested to restore ecosystems. However, little is known about their effects on sagebrush steppe plants. We tested three sources of AMF inoculum: soil from a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37317087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051113 |
_version_ | 1785049816533827584 |
---|---|
author | Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo Mata-González, Ricardo Hovland, Matthew |
author_facet | Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo Mata-González, Ricardo Hovland, Matthew |
author_sort | Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The sagebrush steppe has presented increasing levels of degradation. The addition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and biochar have been suggested to restore ecosystems. However, little is known about their effects on sagebrush steppe plants. We tested three sources of AMF inoculum: soil from a disturbed site (Inoculum A), soil from an undisturbed site (Inoculum B), and commercial inoculum (Inoculum C), all with and without biochar, to test if they could mediate growth of Pseudoroegneria spicata (native perennial), Taeniatherum caput-medusae (early seral; exotic annual) and Ventenata dubia (early seral; exotic annual) under greenhouse conditions. We measured AMF colonization and biomass. We hypothesized that the plant species would be differently affected by the inoculum types. The colonization of T. caput-medusae and V. dubia was greatest when inoculated with Inoculum A (38.8% and 19.6%). In contrast, the colonization of P. spicata was greatest with Inoculum B and Inoculum C (32.1% and 32.2). Biochar decreased biomass production but increased colonization with Inoculum A for P. spicata and V. dubia and with Inoculum C for T. caput-medusae. This study reveals the response of early and late seral sagebrush steppe grass species to contrasting sources of AMF and suggests that late seral plant species respond better to late seral inocula. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10222923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102229232023-05-28 Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo Mata-González, Ricardo Hovland, Matthew Microorganisms Article The sagebrush steppe has presented increasing levels of degradation. The addition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and biochar have been suggested to restore ecosystems. However, little is known about their effects on sagebrush steppe plants. We tested three sources of AMF inoculum: soil from a disturbed site (Inoculum A), soil from an undisturbed site (Inoculum B), and commercial inoculum (Inoculum C), all with and without biochar, to test if they could mediate growth of Pseudoroegneria spicata (native perennial), Taeniatherum caput-medusae (early seral; exotic annual) and Ventenata dubia (early seral; exotic annual) under greenhouse conditions. We measured AMF colonization and biomass. We hypothesized that the plant species would be differently affected by the inoculum types. The colonization of T. caput-medusae and V. dubia was greatest when inoculated with Inoculum A (38.8% and 19.6%). In contrast, the colonization of P. spicata was greatest with Inoculum B and Inoculum C (32.1% and 32.2). Biochar decreased biomass production but increased colonization with Inoculum A for P. spicata and V. dubia and with Inoculum C for T. caput-medusae. This study reveals the response of early and late seral sagebrush steppe grass species to contrasting sources of AMF and suggests that late seral plant species respond better to late seral inocula. MDPI 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10222923/ /pubmed/37317087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051113 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo Mata-González, Ricardo Hovland, Matthew Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar |
title | Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar |
title_full | Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar |
title_fullStr | Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar |
title_full_unstemmed | Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar |
title_short | Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar |
title_sort | response of sagebrush steppe grass species to amf inoculum sources and biochar |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37317087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051113 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pradotarangodavideduardo responseofsagebrushsteppegrassspeciestoamfinoculumsourcesandbiochar AT matagonzalezricardo responseofsagebrushsteppegrassspeciestoamfinoculumsourcesandbiochar AT hovlandmatthew responseofsagebrushsteppegrassspeciestoamfinoculumsourcesandbiochar |