Cargando…

Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar

The sagebrush steppe has presented increasing levels of degradation. The addition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and biochar have been suggested to restore ecosystems. However, little is known about their effects on sagebrush steppe plants. We tested three sources of AMF inoculum: soil from a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo, Mata-González, Ricardo, Hovland, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37317087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051113
_version_ 1785049816533827584
author Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo
Mata-González, Ricardo
Hovland, Matthew
author_facet Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo
Mata-González, Ricardo
Hovland, Matthew
author_sort Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo
collection PubMed
description The sagebrush steppe has presented increasing levels of degradation. The addition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and biochar have been suggested to restore ecosystems. However, little is known about their effects on sagebrush steppe plants. We tested three sources of AMF inoculum: soil from a disturbed site (Inoculum A), soil from an undisturbed site (Inoculum B), and commercial inoculum (Inoculum C), all with and without biochar, to test if they could mediate growth of Pseudoroegneria spicata (native perennial), Taeniatherum caput-medusae (early seral; exotic annual) and Ventenata dubia (early seral; exotic annual) under greenhouse conditions. We measured AMF colonization and biomass. We hypothesized that the plant species would be differently affected by the inoculum types. The colonization of T. caput-medusae and V. dubia was greatest when inoculated with Inoculum A (38.8% and 19.6%). In contrast, the colonization of P. spicata was greatest with Inoculum B and Inoculum C (32.1% and 32.2). Biochar decreased biomass production but increased colonization with Inoculum A for P. spicata and V. dubia and with Inoculum C for T. caput-medusae. This study reveals the response of early and late seral sagebrush steppe grass species to contrasting sources of AMF and suggests that late seral plant species respond better to late seral inocula.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10222923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102229232023-05-28 Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo Mata-González, Ricardo Hovland, Matthew Microorganisms Article The sagebrush steppe has presented increasing levels of degradation. The addition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and biochar have been suggested to restore ecosystems. However, little is known about their effects on sagebrush steppe plants. We tested three sources of AMF inoculum: soil from a disturbed site (Inoculum A), soil from an undisturbed site (Inoculum B), and commercial inoculum (Inoculum C), all with and without biochar, to test if they could mediate growth of Pseudoroegneria spicata (native perennial), Taeniatherum caput-medusae (early seral; exotic annual) and Ventenata dubia (early seral; exotic annual) under greenhouse conditions. We measured AMF colonization and biomass. We hypothesized that the plant species would be differently affected by the inoculum types. The colonization of T. caput-medusae and V. dubia was greatest when inoculated with Inoculum A (38.8% and 19.6%). In contrast, the colonization of P. spicata was greatest with Inoculum B and Inoculum C (32.1% and 32.2). Biochar decreased biomass production but increased colonization with Inoculum A for P. spicata and V. dubia and with Inoculum C for T. caput-medusae. This study reveals the response of early and late seral sagebrush steppe grass species to contrasting sources of AMF and suggests that late seral plant species respond better to late seral inocula. MDPI 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10222923/ /pubmed/37317087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051113 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Prado-Tarango, David Eduardo
Mata-González, Ricardo
Hovland, Matthew
Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar
title Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar
title_full Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar
title_fullStr Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar
title_full_unstemmed Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar
title_short Response of Sagebrush Steppe Grass Species to AMF Inoculum Sources and Biochar
title_sort response of sagebrush steppe grass species to amf inoculum sources and biochar
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37317087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051113
work_keys_str_mv AT pradotarangodavideduardo responseofsagebrushsteppegrassspeciestoamfinoculumsourcesandbiochar
AT matagonzalezricardo responseofsagebrushsteppegrassspeciestoamfinoculumsourcesandbiochar
AT hovlandmatthew responseofsagebrushsteppegrassspeciestoamfinoculumsourcesandbiochar