Cargando…

Quantifying the Differences between 3D Virtual Planning and Attained Postoperative Reduction on CT for Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures; a Clinical Feasibility Study

Background: Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning (3DVP) has been proven to be effective for limiting intra-articular screw penetration and improving the quality of reduction for numerous fractures. However, the value of 3DVP for patients with tibial plateau fractures has yet to be determined. Purposes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Gaast, Nynke, Huitema, Jellina M., Edwards, Britt H. J., Verbakel, Joy, Alderlieste, Dagmar S., Doornberg, Job N., Edwards, Michael J. R., Jaarsma, Ruurd L., Hermans, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050788
_version_ 1785049825078673408
author van der Gaast, Nynke
Huitema, Jellina M.
Edwards, Britt H. J.
Verbakel, Joy
Alderlieste, Dagmar S.
Doornberg, Job N.
Edwards, Michael J. R.
Jaarsma, Ruurd L.
Hermans, Erik
author_facet van der Gaast, Nynke
Huitema, Jellina M.
Edwards, Britt H. J.
Verbakel, Joy
Alderlieste, Dagmar S.
Doornberg, Job N.
Edwards, Michael J. R.
Jaarsma, Ruurd L.
Hermans, Erik
author_sort van der Gaast, Nynke
collection PubMed
description Background: Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning (3DVP) has been proven to be effective for limiting intra-articular screw penetration and improving the quality of reduction for numerous fractures. However, the value of 3DVP for patients with tibial plateau fractures has yet to be determined. Purposes: The research question of this study is: Can Computed Tomography Micromotion Analysis (CTMA) provide a reliable quantification of the difference between 3DVP and the postoperative reduction on CT for tibial plateau fractures? Methods: Nine consecutive adult patients who received surgical treatment for a tibial plateau fracture and received pre- and postoperative CT scans were included from a level I trauma center in the Netherlands. The preoperative CT scans of the patients were uploaded in a 3DVP software. In this software, fracture fragments were reduced and the reduction was saved as a 3D file (STL). The quality of the reduction from the 3DVP software was compared with the postoperative results using CT Micromotion Analysis (CTMA). In this analysis, the translation of the largest intra-articular fragment was calculated by aligning the postoperative CT with the 3DVP. Coordinates and measurement points were defined in the X, Y, and Z axes. The combined values of X and Y were used to define the intra-articular gap. The Z-axis was defined as the line from cranial to caudal and was used to define intra-articular step-off. Results: The intra-articular step-off was 2.4 mm (Range 0.5–4.6). Moreover, the mean translation of the X-axis and Y-axis, which was defined as the intra-articular gap, was 4.2 mm (Range 0.6–10.7). Conclusions: 3DVP provides excellent insight into the fracture and its fragments. Utilizing the largest intra-articular fragment, it is feasible to quantify the difference between 3DVP and a postoperative CT using CTMA. A prospective study to further analyze the use of 3DVP in terms of intra-articular reduction and surgical and patient-related outcomes has been started by our team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10222959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102229592023-05-28 Quantifying the Differences between 3D Virtual Planning and Attained Postoperative Reduction on CT for Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures; a Clinical Feasibility Study van der Gaast, Nynke Huitema, Jellina M. Edwards, Britt H. J. Verbakel, Joy Alderlieste, Dagmar S. Doornberg, Job N. Edwards, Michael J. R. Jaarsma, Ruurd L. Hermans, Erik J Pers Med Brief Report Background: Three-Dimensional Virtual Planning (3DVP) has been proven to be effective for limiting intra-articular screw penetration and improving the quality of reduction for numerous fractures. However, the value of 3DVP for patients with tibial plateau fractures has yet to be determined. Purposes: The research question of this study is: Can Computed Tomography Micromotion Analysis (CTMA) provide a reliable quantification of the difference between 3DVP and the postoperative reduction on CT for tibial plateau fractures? Methods: Nine consecutive adult patients who received surgical treatment for a tibial plateau fracture and received pre- and postoperative CT scans were included from a level I trauma center in the Netherlands. The preoperative CT scans of the patients were uploaded in a 3DVP software. In this software, fracture fragments were reduced and the reduction was saved as a 3D file (STL). The quality of the reduction from the 3DVP software was compared with the postoperative results using CT Micromotion Analysis (CTMA). In this analysis, the translation of the largest intra-articular fragment was calculated by aligning the postoperative CT with the 3DVP. Coordinates and measurement points were defined in the X, Y, and Z axes. The combined values of X and Y were used to define the intra-articular gap. The Z-axis was defined as the line from cranial to caudal and was used to define intra-articular step-off. Results: The intra-articular step-off was 2.4 mm (Range 0.5–4.6). Moreover, the mean translation of the X-axis and Y-axis, which was defined as the intra-articular gap, was 4.2 mm (Range 0.6–10.7). Conclusions: 3DVP provides excellent insight into the fracture and its fragments. Utilizing the largest intra-articular fragment, it is feasible to quantify the difference between 3DVP and a postoperative CT using CTMA. A prospective study to further analyze the use of 3DVP in terms of intra-articular reduction and surgical and patient-related outcomes has been started by our team. MDPI 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10222959/ /pubmed/37240958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050788 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
van der Gaast, Nynke
Huitema, Jellina M.
Edwards, Britt H. J.
Verbakel, Joy
Alderlieste, Dagmar S.
Doornberg, Job N.
Edwards, Michael J. R.
Jaarsma, Ruurd L.
Hermans, Erik
Quantifying the Differences between 3D Virtual Planning and Attained Postoperative Reduction on CT for Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures; a Clinical Feasibility Study
title Quantifying the Differences between 3D Virtual Planning and Attained Postoperative Reduction on CT for Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures; a Clinical Feasibility Study
title_full Quantifying the Differences between 3D Virtual Planning and Attained Postoperative Reduction on CT for Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures; a Clinical Feasibility Study
title_fullStr Quantifying the Differences between 3D Virtual Planning and Attained Postoperative Reduction on CT for Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures; a Clinical Feasibility Study
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the Differences between 3D Virtual Planning and Attained Postoperative Reduction on CT for Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures; a Clinical Feasibility Study
title_short Quantifying the Differences between 3D Virtual Planning and Attained Postoperative Reduction on CT for Patients with Tibial Plateau Fractures; a Clinical Feasibility Study
title_sort quantifying the differences between 3d virtual planning and attained postoperative reduction on ct for patients with tibial plateau fractures; a clinical feasibility study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10222959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37240958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050788
work_keys_str_mv AT vandergaastnynke quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT huitemajellinam quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT edwardsbritthj quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT verbakeljoy quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT alderliestedagmars quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT doornbergjobn quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT edwardsmichaeljr quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT jaarsmaruurdl quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT hermanserik quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy
AT quantifyingthedifferencesbetween3dvirtualplanningandattainedpostoperativereductiononctforpatientswithtibialplateaufracturesaclinicalfeasibilitystudy