Cargando…
Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods
For sample preparation prior to mineral analysis, microwave digestion (~2 h) is quicker and requires lower acid volume as compared to dry (6–8 h) and wet digestion (4–5 h). However, microwave digestion had not yet been compared systematically with dry and wet digestion for different cheese matrices....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103988 |
_version_ | 1785049883918467072 |
---|---|
author | Deshwal, Gaurav K. Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G. Fenelon, Mark Huppertz, Thom |
author_facet | Deshwal, Gaurav K. Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G. Fenelon, Mark Huppertz, Thom |
author_sort | Deshwal, Gaurav K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | For sample preparation prior to mineral analysis, microwave digestion (~2 h) is quicker and requires lower acid volume as compared to dry (6–8 h) and wet digestion (4–5 h). However, microwave digestion had not yet been compared systematically with dry and wet digestion for different cheese matrices. In this work, the three digestion methods were compared for measuring major (Ca, K, Mg, Na and P) and trace minerals (Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) in cheese samples using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The study involved nine different cheese samples with moisture content varying from 32 to 81% and a standard reference material (skim milk powder). For the standard reference material, the relative standard deviation was lowest for microwave digestion (0.2–3.7%) followed by dry (0.2–6.7%) and wet digestion (0.4–7.6%). Overall, for major minerals in cheese, strong correlation was observed between the microwave and the dry and wet digestion methods (R(2) = 0.971–0.999), and Bland–Altman plots showed best method agreement (lowest bias), indicating the comparability of all three digestion methods. A lower correlation coefficient, higher limits of agreement and higher bias of minor minerals indicate possibilities of measurement error. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10223197 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102231972023-05-28 Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods Deshwal, Gaurav K. Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G. Fenelon, Mark Huppertz, Thom Molecules Article For sample preparation prior to mineral analysis, microwave digestion (~2 h) is quicker and requires lower acid volume as compared to dry (6–8 h) and wet digestion (4–5 h). However, microwave digestion had not yet been compared systematically with dry and wet digestion for different cheese matrices. In this work, the three digestion methods were compared for measuring major (Ca, K, Mg, Na and P) and trace minerals (Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) in cheese samples using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The study involved nine different cheese samples with moisture content varying from 32 to 81% and a standard reference material (skim milk powder). For the standard reference material, the relative standard deviation was lowest for microwave digestion (0.2–3.7%) followed by dry (0.2–6.7%) and wet digestion (0.4–7.6%). Overall, for major minerals in cheese, strong correlation was observed between the microwave and the dry and wet digestion methods (R(2) = 0.971–0.999), and Bland–Altman plots showed best method agreement (lowest bias), indicating the comparability of all three digestion methods. A lower correlation coefficient, higher limits of agreement and higher bias of minor minerals indicate possibilities of measurement error. MDPI 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10223197/ /pubmed/37241728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103988 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Deshwal, Gaurav K. Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G. Fenelon, Mark Huppertz, Thom Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods |
title | Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods |
title_full | Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods |
title_fullStr | Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods |
title_short | Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods |
title_sort | determination of minerals in soft and hard cheese varieties by icp-oes: a comparison of digestion methods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223197/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103988 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deshwalgauravk determinationofmineralsinsoftandhardcheesevarietiesbyicpoesacomparisonofdigestionmethods AT gomezmascaraquelaurag determinationofmineralsinsoftandhardcheesevarietiesbyicpoesacomparisonofdigestionmethods AT fenelonmark determinationofmineralsinsoftandhardcheesevarietiesbyicpoesacomparisonofdigestionmethods AT huppertzthom determinationofmineralsinsoftandhardcheesevarietiesbyicpoesacomparisonofdigestionmethods |