Cargando…

Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods

For sample preparation prior to mineral analysis, microwave digestion (~2 h) is quicker and requires lower acid volume as compared to dry (6–8 h) and wet digestion (4–5 h). However, microwave digestion had not yet been compared systematically with dry and wet digestion for different cheese matrices....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deshwal, Gaurav K., Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G., Fenelon, Mark, Huppertz, Thom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103988
_version_ 1785049883918467072
author Deshwal, Gaurav K.
Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G.
Fenelon, Mark
Huppertz, Thom
author_facet Deshwal, Gaurav K.
Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G.
Fenelon, Mark
Huppertz, Thom
author_sort Deshwal, Gaurav K.
collection PubMed
description For sample preparation prior to mineral analysis, microwave digestion (~2 h) is quicker and requires lower acid volume as compared to dry (6–8 h) and wet digestion (4–5 h). However, microwave digestion had not yet been compared systematically with dry and wet digestion for different cheese matrices. In this work, the three digestion methods were compared for measuring major (Ca, K, Mg, Na and P) and trace minerals (Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) in cheese samples using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The study involved nine different cheese samples with moisture content varying from 32 to 81% and a standard reference material (skim milk powder). For the standard reference material, the relative standard deviation was lowest for microwave digestion (0.2–3.7%) followed by dry (0.2–6.7%) and wet digestion (0.4–7.6%). Overall, for major minerals in cheese, strong correlation was observed between the microwave and the dry and wet digestion methods (R(2) = 0.971–0.999), and Bland–Altman plots showed best method agreement (lowest bias), indicating the comparability of all three digestion methods. A lower correlation coefficient, higher limits of agreement and higher bias of minor minerals indicate possibilities of measurement error.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10223197
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102231972023-05-28 Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods Deshwal, Gaurav K. Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G. Fenelon, Mark Huppertz, Thom Molecules Article For sample preparation prior to mineral analysis, microwave digestion (~2 h) is quicker and requires lower acid volume as compared to dry (6–8 h) and wet digestion (4–5 h). However, microwave digestion had not yet been compared systematically with dry and wet digestion for different cheese matrices. In this work, the three digestion methods were compared for measuring major (Ca, K, Mg, Na and P) and trace minerals (Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn) in cheese samples using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). The study involved nine different cheese samples with moisture content varying from 32 to 81% and a standard reference material (skim milk powder). For the standard reference material, the relative standard deviation was lowest for microwave digestion (0.2–3.7%) followed by dry (0.2–6.7%) and wet digestion (0.4–7.6%). Overall, for major minerals in cheese, strong correlation was observed between the microwave and the dry and wet digestion methods (R(2) = 0.971–0.999), and Bland–Altman plots showed best method agreement (lowest bias), indicating the comparability of all three digestion methods. A lower correlation coefficient, higher limits of agreement and higher bias of minor minerals indicate possibilities of measurement error. MDPI 2023-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10223197/ /pubmed/37241728 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103988 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Deshwal, Gaurav K.
Gómez-Mascaraque, Laura G.
Fenelon, Mark
Huppertz, Thom
Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods
title Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods
title_full Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods
title_fullStr Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods
title_full_unstemmed Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods
title_short Determination of Minerals in Soft and Hard Cheese Varieties by ICP-OES: A Comparison of Digestion Methods
title_sort determination of minerals in soft and hard cheese varieties by icp-oes: a comparison of digestion methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223197/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241728
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules28103988
work_keys_str_mv AT deshwalgauravk determinationofmineralsinsoftandhardcheesevarietiesbyicpoesacomparisonofdigestionmethods
AT gomezmascaraquelaurag determinationofmineralsinsoftandhardcheesevarietiesbyicpoesacomparisonofdigestionmethods
AT fenelonmark determinationofmineralsinsoftandhardcheesevarietiesbyicpoesacomparisonofdigestionmethods
AT huppertzthom determinationofmineralsinsoftandhardcheesevarietiesbyicpoesacomparisonofdigestionmethods