Cargando…

Hatchability of Fascioloides magna Eggs in Cervids

The giant liver fluke (Fascioloides magna) is an invasive parasite found permanently in three foci in Europe. The fluke has an indirect life cycle involving a final and an intermediate host. The currently accepted terminology determines three types of final hosts: definitive, dead-end, and aberrant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Halász, Tibor, Tari, Tamás, Nagy, Eszter, Nagy, Gábor, Csivincsik, Ágnes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37242411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050741
_version_ 1785049965379190784
author Halász, Tibor
Tari, Tamás
Nagy, Eszter
Nagy, Gábor
Csivincsik, Ágnes
author_facet Halász, Tibor
Tari, Tamás
Nagy, Eszter
Nagy, Gábor
Csivincsik, Ágnes
author_sort Halász, Tibor
collection PubMed
description The giant liver fluke (Fascioloides magna) is an invasive parasite found permanently in three foci in Europe. The fluke has an indirect life cycle involving a final and an intermediate host. The currently accepted terminology determines three types of final hosts: definitive, dead-end, and aberrant hosts. Recently, roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) has been classified as an aberrant host, which cannot contribute to the reproduction of F. magna. This study investigated the hatchability of F. magna eggs of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer origin to compare the suitability of the two host species for the maintenance of the parasite. The study was carried out on a newly invaded area, two years after the first reported observation of F. magna. The prevalence of the parasite proved to be 68.4% (CI95% 44.6–85.3%) in red deer and 36.7% (CI95% 24.8–50.0%) in roe deer. The difference between the two species was confirmed to be significant (p = 0.02). The mean intensity proved to be 10.0 (CI95% 4.9–22.6) and 7.59 (CI95% 2.7–24.2) in the red deer and the roe deer, respectively. The difference of the mean intensities did not prove to be significant (p = 0.72). Of the 70 observed pseudocysts, 67 originated from red deer and 3 from roe deer. Most of the pseudocysts contained two flukes, while a few pseudocysts contained one or three parasites. Egg production was observed in all three types of pseudocysts. We did not find more than three flukes in any pseudocyst. The apparent proportion of self-fertilisation in flukes without mating partners was 23.5% and 100% in red deer and roe deer, respectively. The survival of single-parent eggs was not confirmed to be worse than that of gregarious parents. The viability of offspring originating from roe and red deer differed significantly. Our findings suggest that F. magna adapted to the new populations of susceptible hosts rather than vice versa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10223535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102235352023-05-28 Hatchability of Fascioloides magna Eggs in Cervids Halász, Tibor Tari, Tamás Nagy, Eszter Nagy, Gábor Csivincsik, Ágnes Pathogens Article The giant liver fluke (Fascioloides magna) is an invasive parasite found permanently in three foci in Europe. The fluke has an indirect life cycle involving a final and an intermediate host. The currently accepted terminology determines three types of final hosts: definitive, dead-end, and aberrant hosts. Recently, roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) has been classified as an aberrant host, which cannot contribute to the reproduction of F. magna. This study investigated the hatchability of F. magna eggs of red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer origin to compare the suitability of the two host species for the maintenance of the parasite. The study was carried out on a newly invaded area, two years after the first reported observation of F. magna. The prevalence of the parasite proved to be 68.4% (CI95% 44.6–85.3%) in red deer and 36.7% (CI95% 24.8–50.0%) in roe deer. The difference between the two species was confirmed to be significant (p = 0.02). The mean intensity proved to be 10.0 (CI95% 4.9–22.6) and 7.59 (CI95% 2.7–24.2) in the red deer and the roe deer, respectively. The difference of the mean intensities did not prove to be significant (p = 0.72). Of the 70 observed pseudocysts, 67 originated from red deer and 3 from roe deer. Most of the pseudocysts contained two flukes, while a few pseudocysts contained one or three parasites. Egg production was observed in all three types of pseudocysts. We did not find more than three flukes in any pseudocyst. The apparent proportion of self-fertilisation in flukes without mating partners was 23.5% and 100% in red deer and roe deer, respectively. The survival of single-parent eggs was not confirmed to be worse than that of gregarious parents. The viability of offspring originating from roe and red deer differed significantly. Our findings suggest that F. magna adapted to the new populations of susceptible hosts rather than vice versa. MDPI 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10223535/ /pubmed/37242411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050741 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Halász, Tibor
Tari, Tamás
Nagy, Eszter
Nagy, Gábor
Csivincsik, Ágnes
Hatchability of Fascioloides magna Eggs in Cervids
title Hatchability of Fascioloides magna Eggs in Cervids
title_full Hatchability of Fascioloides magna Eggs in Cervids
title_fullStr Hatchability of Fascioloides magna Eggs in Cervids
title_full_unstemmed Hatchability of Fascioloides magna Eggs in Cervids
title_short Hatchability of Fascioloides magna Eggs in Cervids
title_sort hatchability of fascioloides magna eggs in cervids
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37242411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens12050741
work_keys_str_mv AT halasztibor hatchabilityoffascioloidesmagnaeggsincervids
AT taritamas hatchabilityoffascioloidesmagnaeggsincervids
AT nagyeszter hatchabilityoffascioloidesmagnaeggsincervids
AT nagygabor hatchabilityoffascioloidesmagnaeggsincervids
AT csivincsikagnes hatchabilityoffascioloidesmagnaeggsincervids