Cargando…

Variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Since oxygen content and oxygen consumption typically remain unchanged within a short period, variation in central venous oxygen saturation (ΔScvO(2)) during fluid challenge can theoretically track the changes in cardiac output (CO). We conducted this meta-analysis to systematically asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Jianneng, Sun, Yuxiang, Xu, Zhaojun, Dong, Pingping, Zhou, Xiaoyang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04480-z
_version_ 1785050052103766016
author Pan, Jianneng
Sun, Yuxiang
Xu, Zhaojun
Dong, Pingping
Zhou, Xiaoyang
author_facet Pan, Jianneng
Sun, Yuxiang
Xu, Zhaojun
Dong, Pingping
Zhou, Xiaoyang
author_sort Pan, Jianneng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since oxygen content and oxygen consumption typically remain unchanged within a short period, variation in central venous oxygen saturation (ΔScvO(2)) during fluid challenge can theoretically track the changes in cardiac output (CO). We conducted this meta-analysis to systematically assess the diagnostic performance of ΔScvO(2) during a fluid challenge for fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients receiving volume expansion. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before October 24, 2022. As the cutoff value of ΔScvO(2) was expected to vary across the included studies, we estimated the area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUHSROC) as the primary measure of diagnostic accuracy. The optimal threshold of ΔScvO(2) and the corresponding 95% confidential interval (CI) were also estimated. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 5 observational studies comprising 240 participants, of whom 133 (55%) were fluid responders. Overall, the ΔScvO(2) during the fluid challenge exhibited excellent performance for defining fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients receiving volume expansion, with an AUHSROC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83–0.89), a pooled sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.69–0.85), a pooled specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.72–0.91), and a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 17.7 (95% CI 5.9–53.2). The distribution of the cutoff values was nearly conically symmetrical and concentered between 3 and 5%; the mean and median cutoff values were 4% (95% CI 3–5%) and 4% (95% CI not estimable), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In mechanically ventilated patients receiving volume expansion, the ΔScvO2 during the fluid challenge is a reliable indicator of fluid responsiveness. Clinical trial registration PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, registry number: CRD42022370192. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04480-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10223907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102239072023-05-28 Variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis Pan, Jianneng Sun, Yuxiang Xu, Zhaojun Dong, Pingping Zhou, Xiaoyang Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Since oxygen content and oxygen consumption typically remain unchanged within a short period, variation in central venous oxygen saturation (ΔScvO(2)) during fluid challenge can theoretically track the changes in cardiac output (CO). We conducted this meta-analysis to systematically assess the diagnostic performance of ΔScvO(2) during a fluid challenge for fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients receiving volume expansion. METHODS: Electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before October 24, 2022. As the cutoff value of ΔScvO(2) was expected to vary across the included studies, we estimated the area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUHSROC) as the primary measure of diagnostic accuracy. The optimal threshold of ΔScvO(2) and the corresponding 95% confidential interval (CI) were also estimated. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included 5 observational studies comprising 240 participants, of whom 133 (55%) were fluid responders. Overall, the ΔScvO(2) during the fluid challenge exhibited excellent performance for defining fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients receiving volume expansion, with an AUHSROC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.83–0.89), a pooled sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.69–0.85), a pooled specificity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.72–0.91), and a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 17.7 (95% CI 5.9–53.2). The distribution of the cutoff values was nearly conically symmetrical and concentered between 3 and 5%; the mean and median cutoff values were 4% (95% CI 3–5%) and 4% (95% CI not estimable), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In mechanically ventilated patients receiving volume expansion, the ΔScvO2 during the fluid challenge is a reliable indicator of fluid responsiveness. Clinical trial registration PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, registry number: CRD42022370192. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-023-04480-z. BioMed Central 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10223907/ /pubmed/37237410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04480-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pan, Jianneng
Sun, Yuxiang
Xu, Zhaojun
Dong, Pingping
Zhou, Xiaoyang
Variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort variation in central venous oxygen saturation to evaluate fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04480-z
work_keys_str_mv AT panjianneng variationincentralvenousoxygensaturationtoevaluatefluidresponsivenessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sunyuxiang variationincentralvenousoxygensaturationtoevaluatefluidresponsivenessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xuzhaojun variationincentralvenousoxygensaturationtoevaluatefluidresponsivenessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dongpingping variationincentralvenousoxygensaturationtoevaluatefluidresponsivenessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhouxiaoyang variationincentralvenousoxygensaturationtoevaluatefluidresponsivenessasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis