Cargando…
Real-World Effectiveness of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines
Background: There is a scarcity of evidence regarding the real-world effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This was the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of four types of vaccines against asymptomatic and symptomatic infection, and COVID-19 outcomes among the general...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37243089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050985 |
_version_ | 1785050123201413120 |
---|---|
author | Abdel-Qader, Derar H. Abdel-Qader, Hasan Silverthorne, Jennifer Kongkaew, Chuenjid Meslamani, Ahmad Z. Al Hayajneh, Wail Alwahadneh, Adel M. Hamadi, Salim Abu-Qatouseh, Luay Awad, Riad Al Nsour, Mohannad Alhariri, Abdallah Shnewer, Khaldoun Da’ssan, Mohammad Obeidat, Nathir M. Nusair, Khaldoon E. Jalamdeh, Mothafer S. Hawari, Feras Asad, Mohammad AbuRuz, Salah |
author_facet | Abdel-Qader, Derar H. Abdel-Qader, Hasan Silverthorne, Jennifer Kongkaew, Chuenjid Meslamani, Ahmad Z. Al Hayajneh, Wail Alwahadneh, Adel M. Hamadi, Salim Abu-Qatouseh, Luay Awad, Riad Al Nsour, Mohannad Alhariri, Abdallah Shnewer, Khaldoun Da’ssan, Mohammad Obeidat, Nathir M. Nusair, Khaldoon E. Jalamdeh, Mothafer S. Hawari, Feras Asad, Mohammad AbuRuz, Salah |
author_sort | Abdel-Qader, Derar H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: There is a scarcity of evidence regarding the real-world effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This was the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of four types of vaccines against asymptomatic and symptomatic infection, and COVID-19 outcomes among the general population. Methods: This was a matched comparison group quasi-experimental study conducted in Jordan between 1 January and 29 August 2021. In the first part of the study, 1200 fully vaccinated individuals were matched with 1200 unvaccinated control participants. In order to measure vaccine effectiveness, the infection rates of both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were calculated. The second part of the study included measuring specific anti-SARS CoV-2 immune cells and antibodies. Results: BNT162b2 (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) showed a significantly higher effectiveness against asymptomatic COVID-19 infection (91.7%) and hospitalization (99.5%) than BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm, Beijing, China) (88.4% and 98.7%, respectively) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK) (84.3%, and 98.9%, respectively). The effectiveness rates of the Sputnik V (Gamaleya Research Institute, Moscow, Russia) vaccine against asymptomatic, symptomatic, and hospitalization were 100%, 100%, and 66.7%, respectively. The highest median anti-spike (S) IgG values were seen in individuals who received BNT162b2 (2.9 AU/mL) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (2.8 AU/mL) vaccines. The levels of anti-S IgG were significantly decreased after 7 months of vaccination with BNT162b2 and BBIBP-CorV. There were significant decreases in the median number of neutralizing antibodies one month and seven months after receiving BNT162b2 (from 88.5 to 75.2 4 Bioequivalent Allergen Unit per milliliter/mL), BBIBP-CorV (from 69.5 to 51.5 BAU/mL), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (from 69.2 to 58.BAU/mL) vaccines. The highest percentage of T cells specific to COVID-19 vaccine was found in individuals who received BNT162b2 (88.5%). Conclusion: All four vaccines evaluated in this study showed effectiveness against asymptomatic COVID-19 infection, symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and death. Furthermore, BNT162b2, BBIBP-CorV, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 induced high levels of immunology markers within one month of vaccination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10224211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102242112023-05-28 Real-World Effectiveness of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines Abdel-Qader, Derar H. Abdel-Qader, Hasan Silverthorne, Jennifer Kongkaew, Chuenjid Meslamani, Ahmad Z. Al Hayajneh, Wail Alwahadneh, Adel M. Hamadi, Salim Abu-Qatouseh, Luay Awad, Riad Al Nsour, Mohannad Alhariri, Abdallah Shnewer, Khaldoun Da’ssan, Mohammad Obeidat, Nathir M. Nusair, Khaldoon E. Jalamdeh, Mothafer S. Hawari, Feras Asad, Mohammad AbuRuz, Salah Vaccines (Basel) Article Background: There is a scarcity of evidence regarding the real-world effectiveness of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This was the first study to evaluate the effectiveness of four types of vaccines against asymptomatic and symptomatic infection, and COVID-19 outcomes among the general population. Methods: This was a matched comparison group quasi-experimental study conducted in Jordan between 1 January and 29 August 2021. In the first part of the study, 1200 fully vaccinated individuals were matched with 1200 unvaccinated control participants. In order to measure vaccine effectiveness, the infection rates of both vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were calculated. The second part of the study included measuring specific anti-SARS CoV-2 immune cells and antibodies. Results: BNT162b2 (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA) showed a significantly higher effectiveness against asymptomatic COVID-19 infection (91.7%) and hospitalization (99.5%) than BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm, Beijing, China) (88.4% and 98.7%, respectively) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK) (84.3%, and 98.9%, respectively). The effectiveness rates of the Sputnik V (Gamaleya Research Institute, Moscow, Russia) vaccine against asymptomatic, symptomatic, and hospitalization were 100%, 100%, and 66.7%, respectively. The highest median anti-spike (S) IgG values were seen in individuals who received BNT162b2 (2.9 AU/mL) and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (2.8 AU/mL) vaccines. The levels of anti-S IgG were significantly decreased after 7 months of vaccination with BNT162b2 and BBIBP-CorV. There were significant decreases in the median number of neutralizing antibodies one month and seven months after receiving BNT162b2 (from 88.5 to 75.2 4 Bioequivalent Allergen Unit per milliliter/mL), BBIBP-CorV (from 69.5 to 51.5 BAU/mL), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (from 69.2 to 58.BAU/mL) vaccines. The highest percentage of T cells specific to COVID-19 vaccine was found in individuals who received BNT162b2 (88.5%). Conclusion: All four vaccines evaluated in this study showed effectiveness against asymptomatic COVID-19 infection, symptomatic infection, hospitalization, and death. Furthermore, BNT162b2, BBIBP-CorV, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 induced high levels of immunology markers within one month of vaccination. MDPI 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10224211/ /pubmed/37243089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050985 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Abdel-Qader, Derar H. Abdel-Qader, Hasan Silverthorne, Jennifer Kongkaew, Chuenjid Meslamani, Ahmad Z. Al Hayajneh, Wail Alwahadneh, Adel M. Hamadi, Salim Abu-Qatouseh, Luay Awad, Riad Al Nsour, Mohannad Alhariri, Abdallah Shnewer, Khaldoun Da’ssan, Mohammad Obeidat, Nathir M. Nusair, Khaldoon E. Jalamdeh, Mothafer S. Hawari, Feras Asad, Mohammad AbuRuz, Salah Real-World Effectiveness of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines |
title | Real-World Effectiveness of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines |
title_full | Real-World Effectiveness of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines |
title_fullStr | Real-World Effectiveness of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-World Effectiveness of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines |
title_short | Real-World Effectiveness of Four Types of COVID-19 Vaccines |
title_sort | real-world effectiveness of four types of covid-19 vaccines |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37243089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abdelqaderderarh realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT abdelqaderhasan realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT silverthornejennifer realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT kongkaewchuenjid realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT meslamaniahmadzal realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT hayajnehwail realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT alwahadnehadelm realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT hamadisalim realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT abuqatousehluay realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT awadriad realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT alnsourmohannad realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT alhaririabdallah realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT shnewerkhaldoun realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT dassanmohammad realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT obeidatnathirm realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT nusairkhaldoone realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT jalamdehmothafers realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT hawariferas realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT asadmohammad realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines AT aburuzsalah realworldeffectivenessoffourtypesofcovid19vaccines |