Cargando…

Foliar Phenotypic Plasticity Reflects Adaptation to Environmental Variability

Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes adapted to native habitats with different daylengths, temperatures, and precipitation were grown experimentally under seven combinations of light intensity and leaf temperature to assess their acclimatory phenotypic plasticity in foliar structure and function. There wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adams, William W., Stewart, Jared J., Polutchko, Stephanie K., Cohu, Christopher M., Muller, Onno, Demmig-Adams, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12102041
_version_ 1785050186849976320
author Adams, William W.
Stewart, Jared J.
Polutchko, Stephanie K.
Cohu, Christopher M.
Muller, Onno
Demmig-Adams, Barbara
author_facet Adams, William W.
Stewart, Jared J.
Polutchko, Stephanie K.
Cohu, Christopher M.
Muller, Onno
Demmig-Adams, Barbara
author_sort Adams, William W.
collection PubMed
description Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes adapted to native habitats with different daylengths, temperatures, and precipitation were grown experimentally under seven combinations of light intensity and leaf temperature to assess their acclimatory phenotypic plasticity in foliar structure and function. There were no differences among ecotypes when plants developed under moderate conditions of 400 µmol photons m(−2) s(−1) and 25 °C. However, in response to more extreme light or temperature regimes, ecotypes that evolved in habitats with pronounced differences in either the magnitude of changes in daylength or temperature or in precipitation level exhibited pronounced adjustments in photosynthesis and transpiration, as well as anatomical traits supporting these functions. Specifically, when grown under extremes of light intensity (100 versus 1000 µmol photons m(−2) s(−1)) or temperature (8 °C versus 35 °C), ecotypes from sites with the greatest range of daylengths and temperature over the growing season exhibited the greatest differences in functional and structural features related to photosynthesis (light- and CO(2)-saturated capacity of oxygen evolution, leaf dry mass per area or thickness, phloem cells per minor vein, and water-use efficiency of CO(2) uptake). On the other hand, the ecotype from the habitat with the lowest precipitation showed the greatest plasticity in features related to water transport and loss (vein density, ratio of water to sugar conduits in foliar minor veins, and transpiration rate). Despite these differences, common structure–function relationships existed across all ecotypes and growth conditions, with significant positive, linear correlations (i) between photosynthetic capacity (ranging from 10 to 110 µmol O(2) m(−2) s(−1)) and leaf dry mass per area (from 10 to 75 g m(−2)), leaf thickness (from 170 to 500 µm), and carbohydrate-export infrastructure (from 6 to 14 sieve elements per minor vein, from 2.5 to 8 µm(2) cross-sectional area per sieve element, and from 16 to 82 µm(2) cross-sectional area of sieve elements per minor vein); (ii) between transpiration rate (from 1 to 17 mmol H(2)O m(−2) s(−1)) and water-transport infrastructure (from 3.5 to 8 tracheary elements per minor vein, from 13.5 to 28 µm(2) cross-sectional area per tracheary element, and from 55 to 200 µm(2) cross-sectional area of tracheary elements per minor vein); (iii) between the ratio of transpirational water loss to CO(2) fixation (from 0.2 to 0.7 mol H(2)O to mmol(−1) CO(2)) and the ratio of water to sugar conduits in minor veins (from 0.4 to 1.1 tracheary to sieve elements, from 4 to 6 µm(2) cross-sectional area of tracheary to sieve elements, and from 2 to 6 µm(2) cross-sectional area of tracheary elements to sieve elements per minor vein); (iv) between sugar conduits and sugar-loading cells; and (v) between water conducting and sugar conducting cells. Additionally, the proportion of water conduits to sugar conduits was greater for all ecotypes grown experimentally under warm-to-hot versus cold temperature. Thus, developmental acclimation to the growth environment included ecotype-dependent foliar structural and functional adjustments resulting in multiple common structural and functional relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10224448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102244482023-05-28 Foliar Phenotypic Plasticity Reflects Adaptation to Environmental Variability Adams, William W. Stewart, Jared J. Polutchko, Stephanie K. Cohu, Christopher M. Muller, Onno Demmig-Adams, Barbara Plants (Basel) Article Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes adapted to native habitats with different daylengths, temperatures, and precipitation were grown experimentally under seven combinations of light intensity and leaf temperature to assess their acclimatory phenotypic plasticity in foliar structure and function. There were no differences among ecotypes when plants developed under moderate conditions of 400 µmol photons m(−2) s(−1) and 25 °C. However, in response to more extreme light or temperature regimes, ecotypes that evolved in habitats with pronounced differences in either the magnitude of changes in daylength or temperature or in precipitation level exhibited pronounced adjustments in photosynthesis and transpiration, as well as anatomical traits supporting these functions. Specifically, when grown under extremes of light intensity (100 versus 1000 µmol photons m(−2) s(−1)) or temperature (8 °C versus 35 °C), ecotypes from sites with the greatest range of daylengths and temperature over the growing season exhibited the greatest differences in functional and structural features related to photosynthesis (light- and CO(2)-saturated capacity of oxygen evolution, leaf dry mass per area or thickness, phloem cells per minor vein, and water-use efficiency of CO(2) uptake). On the other hand, the ecotype from the habitat with the lowest precipitation showed the greatest plasticity in features related to water transport and loss (vein density, ratio of water to sugar conduits in foliar minor veins, and transpiration rate). Despite these differences, common structure–function relationships existed across all ecotypes and growth conditions, with significant positive, linear correlations (i) between photosynthetic capacity (ranging from 10 to 110 µmol O(2) m(−2) s(−1)) and leaf dry mass per area (from 10 to 75 g m(−2)), leaf thickness (from 170 to 500 µm), and carbohydrate-export infrastructure (from 6 to 14 sieve elements per minor vein, from 2.5 to 8 µm(2) cross-sectional area per sieve element, and from 16 to 82 µm(2) cross-sectional area of sieve elements per minor vein); (ii) between transpiration rate (from 1 to 17 mmol H(2)O m(−2) s(−1)) and water-transport infrastructure (from 3.5 to 8 tracheary elements per minor vein, from 13.5 to 28 µm(2) cross-sectional area per tracheary element, and from 55 to 200 µm(2) cross-sectional area of tracheary elements per minor vein); (iii) between the ratio of transpirational water loss to CO(2) fixation (from 0.2 to 0.7 mol H(2)O to mmol(−1) CO(2)) and the ratio of water to sugar conduits in minor veins (from 0.4 to 1.1 tracheary to sieve elements, from 4 to 6 µm(2) cross-sectional area of tracheary to sieve elements, and from 2 to 6 µm(2) cross-sectional area of tracheary elements to sieve elements per minor vein); (iv) between sugar conduits and sugar-loading cells; and (v) between water conducting and sugar conducting cells. Additionally, the proportion of water conduits to sugar conduits was greater for all ecotypes grown experimentally under warm-to-hot versus cold temperature. Thus, developmental acclimation to the growth environment included ecotype-dependent foliar structural and functional adjustments resulting in multiple common structural and functional relationships. MDPI 2023-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10224448/ /pubmed/37653958 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12102041 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Adams, William W.
Stewart, Jared J.
Polutchko, Stephanie K.
Cohu, Christopher M.
Muller, Onno
Demmig-Adams, Barbara
Foliar Phenotypic Plasticity Reflects Adaptation to Environmental Variability
title Foliar Phenotypic Plasticity Reflects Adaptation to Environmental Variability
title_full Foliar Phenotypic Plasticity Reflects Adaptation to Environmental Variability
title_fullStr Foliar Phenotypic Plasticity Reflects Adaptation to Environmental Variability
title_full_unstemmed Foliar Phenotypic Plasticity Reflects Adaptation to Environmental Variability
title_short Foliar Phenotypic Plasticity Reflects Adaptation to Environmental Variability
title_sort foliar phenotypic plasticity reflects adaptation to environmental variability
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653958
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12102041
work_keys_str_mv AT adamswilliamw foliarphenotypicplasticityreflectsadaptationtoenvironmentalvariability
AT stewartjaredj foliarphenotypicplasticityreflectsadaptationtoenvironmentalvariability
AT polutchkostephaniek foliarphenotypicplasticityreflectsadaptationtoenvironmentalvariability
AT cohuchristopherm foliarphenotypicplasticityreflectsadaptationtoenvironmentalvariability
AT mulleronno foliarphenotypicplasticityreflectsadaptationtoenvironmentalvariability
AT demmigadamsbarbara foliarphenotypicplasticityreflectsadaptationtoenvironmentalvariability