Cargando…

Optimization of Friction Stir Spot Welding Process Using Bonding Criterion and Artificial Neural Network

The objectives of this study were to analyze the bonding criteria for friction stir spot welding (FSSW) using a finite element analysis (FEA) and to determine the optimal process parameters using artificial neural networks. Pressure-time and pressure-time-flow criteria are the bonding criteria used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jo, Deok Sang, Kahhal, Parviz, Kim, Ji Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16103757
_version_ 1785050221154140160
author Jo, Deok Sang
Kahhal, Parviz
Kim, Ji Hoon
author_facet Jo, Deok Sang
Kahhal, Parviz
Kim, Ji Hoon
author_sort Jo, Deok Sang
collection PubMed
description The objectives of this study were to analyze the bonding criteria for friction stir spot welding (FSSW) using a finite element analysis (FEA) and to determine the optimal process parameters using artificial neural networks. Pressure-time and pressure-time-flow criteria are the bonding criteria used to confirm the degree of bonding in solid-state bonding processes such as porthole die extrusion and roll bonding. The FEA of the FSSW process was performed with ABAQUS-3D Explicit, with the results applied to the bonding criteria. Additionally, the coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian method used for large deformations was applied to deal with severe mesh distortions. Of the two criteria, the pressure-time-flow criterion was found to be more suitable for the FSSW process. Using artificial neural networks with the bonding criteria results, process parameters were optimized for weld zone hardness and bonding strength. Among the three process parameters used, tool rotational speed was found to have the largest effect on bonding strength and hardness. Experimental results were obtained using the process parameters, and these results were compared to the predicted results and verified. The experimental value for bonding strength was 4.0 kN and the predicted value of 4.147 kN, resulting in an error of 3.675%. For hardness, the experimental value was 62 Hv, the predicted value was 60.018 Hv, and the error was 3.197%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10224546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102245462023-05-28 Optimization of Friction Stir Spot Welding Process Using Bonding Criterion and Artificial Neural Network Jo, Deok Sang Kahhal, Parviz Kim, Ji Hoon Materials (Basel) Article The objectives of this study were to analyze the bonding criteria for friction stir spot welding (FSSW) using a finite element analysis (FEA) and to determine the optimal process parameters using artificial neural networks. Pressure-time and pressure-time-flow criteria are the bonding criteria used to confirm the degree of bonding in solid-state bonding processes such as porthole die extrusion and roll bonding. The FEA of the FSSW process was performed with ABAQUS-3D Explicit, with the results applied to the bonding criteria. Additionally, the coupled Eulerian–Lagrangian method used for large deformations was applied to deal with severe mesh distortions. Of the two criteria, the pressure-time-flow criterion was found to be more suitable for the FSSW process. Using artificial neural networks with the bonding criteria results, process parameters were optimized for weld zone hardness and bonding strength. Among the three process parameters used, tool rotational speed was found to have the largest effect on bonding strength and hardness. Experimental results were obtained using the process parameters, and these results were compared to the predicted results and verified. The experimental value for bonding strength was 4.0 kN and the predicted value of 4.147 kN, resulting in an error of 3.675%. For hardness, the experimental value was 62 Hv, the predicted value was 60.018 Hv, and the error was 3.197%. MDPI 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10224546/ /pubmed/37241382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16103757 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jo, Deok Sang
Kahhal, Parviz
Kim, Ji Hoon
Optimization of Friction Stir Spot Welding Process Using Bonding Criterion and Artificial Neural Network
title Optimization of Friction Stir Spot Welding Process Using Bonding Criterion and Artificial Neural Network
title_full Optimization of Friction Stir Spot Welding Process Using Bonding Criterion and Artificial Neural Network
title_fullStr Optimization of Friction Stir Spot Welding Process Using Bonding Criterion and Artificial Neural Network
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of Friction Stir Spot Welding Process Using Bonding Criterion and Artificial Neural Network
title_short Optimization of Friction Stir Spot Welding Process Using Bonding Criterion and Artificial Neural Network
title_sort optimization of friction stir spot welding process using bonding criterion and artificial neural network
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37241382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16103757
work_keys_str_mv AT jodeoksang optimizationoffrictionstirspotweldingprocessusingbondingcriterionandartificialneuralnetwork
AT kahhalparviz optimizationoffrictionstirspotweldingprocessusingbondingcriterionandartificialneuralnetwork
AT kimjihoon optimizationoffrictionstirspotweldingprocessusingbondingcriterionandartificialneuralnetwork