Cargando…

Application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Nano-hydroxyapatite and its composites(nHA) have been widely used as grafts in inter-vertebral fusion. However, the safety and efficacy of the graft in inter-vertebral fusion is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of nHA and non-hydroxyapatite gra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Kui, Zhu, Yandong, Wang, Wenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37245034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06405-x
_version_ 1785050230220128256
author Zhang, Kui
Zhu, Yandong
Wang, Wenji
author_facet Zhang, Kui
Zhu, Yandong
Wang, Wenji
author_sort Zhang, Kui
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Nano-hydroxyapatite and its composites(nHA) have been widely used as grafts in inter-vertebral fusion. However, the safety and efficacy of the graft in inter-vertebral fusion is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of nHA and non-hydroxyapatite grafts (noHA) (autologous bone, etc.) in inter-body fusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in electronic database as follows: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) from inception until October 2022. Clinical studies on the effect of nHA and noHA in spinal fusion were collected. Analysis of outcome indicators using RevMan 5.4 statistical software. RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed that the operation time of patients who underwent inter-body fusion with nHA grafts was less than that of patients who underwent noHA (p < 0.05). Compared with the noHA group, the nHA group can achieve similar clinical effects in the fusion rate(OR = 1.29,95%CI: 0.88 to 1.88,p = 0.19),Subsidence rate(OR = 1.2,95%CI:0.44 to 3.28,p = 0.72), inter-vertebral space height(SMD = 0.04,95%CI:-0.08 to 0.15,p = 0.54),Cobb angle(SMD = 0.21,95%CI: 0.18 to 0.6,p = 0.21),Blood loss(SMD = -36.58,95%CI: -81.45 to 8.29,p = 0.11),operative time in 12 months(SMD = -5.82,95%CI: -9.98 to -1.67,p = 0.006) and in the final follow-up(SMD = -0.38,95%CI: -0.51 to -0.26,p < 0.00001),ODI(SMD = 0.68,95%CI: -0.84 to 2.19,p = 0.38), VAS(SMD = 0.17,95%CI: -0.13 to 0.48,p = 0.27) and adverse events(OR = 0.98,95%CI: 0.66 to 1.45,p = 0.92), and the differences are not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that nHA matrix grafts are similar to noHA grafts in the safety and efficacy of spinal reconstruction, and are an ideal material for inter-vertebral bone grafting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06405-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10224592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102245922023-05-28 Application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis Zhang, Kui Zhu, Yandong Wang, Wenji BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research OBJECTIVE: Nano-hydroxyapatite and its composites(nHA) have been widely used as grafts in inter-vertebral fusion. However, the safety and efficacy of the graft in inter-vertebral fusion is controversial. This meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of nHA and non-hydroxyapatite grafts (noHA) (autologous bone, etc.) in inter-body fusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in electronic database as follows: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) from inception until October 2022. Clinical studies on the effect of nHA and noHA in spinal fusion were collected. Analysis of outcome indicators using RevMan 5.4 statistical software. RESULTS: The meta-analysis showed that the operation time of patients who underwent inter-body fusion with nHA grafts was less than that of patients who underwent noHA (p < 0.05). Compared with the noHA group, the nHA group can achieve similar clinical effects in the fusion rate(OR = 1.29,95%CI: 0.88 to 1.88,p = 0.19),Subsidence rate(OR = 1.2,95%CI:0.44 to 3.28,p = 0.72), inter-vertebral space height(SMD = 0.04,95%CI:-0.08 to 0.15,p = 0.54),Cobb angle(SMD = 0.21,95%CI: 0.18 to 0.6,p = 0.21),Blood loss(SMD = -36.58,95%CI: -81.45 to 8.29,p = 0.11),operative time in 12 months(SMD = -5.82,95%CI: -9.98 to -1.67,p = 0.006) and in the final follow-up(SMD = -0.38,95%CI: -0.51 to -0.26,p < 0.00001),ODI(SMD = 0.68,95%CI: -0.84 to 2.19,p = 0.38), VAS(SMD = 0.17,95%CI: -0.13 to 0.48,p = 0.27) and adverse events(OR = 0.98,95%CI: 0.66 to 1.45,p = 0.92), and the differences are not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that nHA matrix grafts are similar to noHA grafts in the safety and efficacy of spinal reconstruction, and are an ideal material for inter-vertebral bone grafting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06405-x. BioMed Central 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10224592/ /pubmed/37245034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06405-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Kui
Zhu, Yandong
Wang, Wenji
Application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis
title Application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis
title_full Application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis
title_short Application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis
title_sort application of nano-hydroxyapatite matrix graft in inter-vertebral fusion therapy: a meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37245034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06405-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangkui applicationofnanohydroxyapatitematrixgraftinintervertebralfusiontherapyametaanalysis
AT zhuyandong applicationofnanohydroxyapatitematrixgraftinintervertebralfusiontherapyametaanalysis
AT wangwenji applicationofnanohydroxyapatitematrixgraftinintervertebralfusiontherapyametaanalysis