Cargando…
Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review
Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality with fatal outcomes if not treated well. The goal of this study was to compare the intramuscular and intravenous treatment of individuals with status epilepticus. A search was performed on Scopus, PubMed, Emb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252570 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38212 |
_version_ | 1785050267738177536 |
---|---|
author | Aldharman, Sarah S Alayed, Faisal T Almutairi, Fay A Aljohani, Badr S Alhumaidi, Kadi A Alayyaf, Abdulaziz S Alismail, Rayan M Binshalhoub, Fahad H Alsahil, Shahad J Alnaaim, Saud A |
author_facet | Aldharman, Sarah S Alayed, Faisal T Almutairi, Fay A Aljohani, Badr S Alhumaidi, Kadi A Alayyaf, Abdulaziz S Alismail, Rayan M Binshalhoub, Fahad H Alsahil, Shahad J Alnaaim, Saud A |
author_sort | Aldharman, Sarah S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality with fatal outcomes if not treated well. The goal of this study was to compare the intramuscular and intravenous treatment of individuals with status epilepticus. A search was performed on Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for articles published in the English language in peer-reviewed publications up to March 1, 2023. Studies were included if the treatment of status epileptics was compared either directly or indirectly between intramuscular and intravenous methods. In addition, relevant papers were manually screened for in the reference lists of the included studies. Non-duplicate articles were identified. Finally, five articles were included in the analysis, of which four were randomized controlled trials and one was a retrospective cohort study. The intramuscular midazolam group’s time until the first seizure stopped was significantly shorter than the intravenous diazepam group’s time (7.8 versus 11.2 minutes, respectively; p = 0.047). Moreover, the percentage of patients admitted was significantly lower in the intramuscular group than in the intravenous group (p = 0.01), but the lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital did not differ significantly between the groups. Regarding seizure recurrence, the intramuscular group had fewer incidences of recurrent seizures. Finally, there were no appreciable differences in safety outcomes between the two treatment arms. During the analysis, different outcomes reported after the use of intramuscular and intravenous treatments in managing patients with status epilepticus were categorized. This categorization led to a clear view of the efficacy and safety of intramuscular versus intravenous treatments in managing status epilepticus patients. The information at hand indicates that intramuscular therapy is just as successful as intravenous therapy in treating people with status epilepticus. The availability, adverse effect profile, logistics of administration, cost, and whether it is included in hospital formularies are some of the factors to be taken into consideration when choosing the drug administration technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10224766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102247662023-05-28 Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review Aldharman, Sarah S Alayed, Faisal T Almutairi, Fay A Aljohani, Badr S Alhumaidi, Kadi A Alayyaf, Abdulaziz S Alismail, Rayan M Binshalhoub, Fahad H Alsahil, Shahad J Alnaaim, Saud A Cureus Neurology Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality with fatal outcomes if not treated well. The goal of this study was to compare the intramuscular and intravenous treatment of individuals with status epilepticus. A search was performed on Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for articles published in the English language in peer-reviewed publications up to March 1, 2023. Studies were included if the treatment of status epileptics was compared either directly or indirectly between intramuscular and intravenous methods. In addition, relevant papers were manually screened for in the reference lists of the included studies. Non-duplicate articles were identified. Finally, five articles were included in the analysis, of which four were randomized controlled trials and one was a retrospective cohort study. The intramuscular midazolam group’s time until the first seizure stopped was significantly shorter than the intravenous diazepam group’s time (7.8 versus 11.2 minutes, respectively; p = 0.047). Moreover, the percentage of patients admitted was significantly lower in the intramuscular group than in the intravenous group (p = 0.01), but the lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and the hospital did not differ significantly between the groups. Regarding seizure recurrence, the intramuscular group had fewer incidences of recurrent seizures. Finally, there were no appreciable differences in safety outcomes between the two treatment arms. During the analysis, different outcomes reported after the use of intramuscular and intravenous treatments in managing patients with status epilepticus were categorized. This categorization led to a clear view of the efficacy and safety of intramuscular versus intravenous treatments in managing status epilepticus patients. The information at hand indicates that intramuscular therapy is just as successful as intravenous therapy in treating people with status epilepticus. The availability, adverse effect profile, logistics of administration, cost, and whether it is included in hospital formularies are some of the factors to be taken into consideration when choosing the drug administration technique. Cureus 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10224766/ /pubmed/37252570 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38212 Text en Copyright © 2023, Aldharman et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Aldharman, Sarah S Alayed, Faisal T Almutairi, Fay A Aljohani, Badr S Alhumaidi, Kadi A Alayyaf, Abdulaziz S Alismail, Rayan M Binshalhoub, Fahad H Alsahil, Shahad J Alnaaim, Saud A Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title | Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Intramuscular Versus Intravenous Treatment of Status Epilepticus: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | intramuscular versus intravenous treatment of status epilepticus: a systematic review |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252570 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aldharmansarahs intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT alayedfaisalt intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT almutairifaya intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT aljohanibadrs intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT alhumaidikadia intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT alayyafabdulazizs intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT alismailrayanm intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT binshalhoubfahadh intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT alsahilshahadj intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview AT alnaaimsauda intramuscularversusintravenoustreatmentofstatusepilepticusasystematicreview |