Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), and there are two types: polymer-free and polymer-coated stents. Polymer-free stents have a coating that is quickly absorbed by the body, whereas polymer-coated stents have a coating that remains on the stent surfac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khatri, Mahima, Kumar, Satesh, Mahfooz, Kamran, Sugandh, FNU, Dembra, Deepak, Mehak, FNU, Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias, Islam, Hamza, Islam, Rabia, Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad, Patel, Tirath, Kumar, Ajay, Kumar, Nomesh, Varrassi, Giustino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252538
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38215
_version_ 1785050268520415232
author Khatri, Mahima
Kumar, Satesh
Mahfooz, Kamran
Sugandh, FNU
Dembra, Deepak
Mehak, FNU
Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias
Islam, Hamza
Islam, Rabia
Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad
Patel, Tirath
Kumar, Ajay
Kumar, Nomesh
Varrassi, Giustino
author_facet Khatri, Mahima
Kumar, Satesh
Mahfooz, Kamran
Sugandh, FNU
Dembra, Deepak
Mehak, FNU
Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias
Islam, Hamza
Islam, Rabia
Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad
Patel, Tirath
Kumar, Ajay
Kumar, Nomesh
Varrassi, Giustino
author_sort Khatri, Mahima
collection PubMed
description Drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), and there are two types: polymer-free and polymer-coated stents. Polymer-free stents have a coating that is quickly absorbed by the body, whereas polymer-coated stents have a coating that remains on the stent surface. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of these two stent types in patients with coronary artery disease. The literature and abstracts from significant databases were reviewed to compare polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) and polymer-coated drug-eluting stents (PC-DES) for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The primary efficacy endpoints of the study were all-cause mortality and deaths from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. Among the secondary outcomes were incidences of myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). In terms of the primary outcomes, the combined analysis revealed a marginally lower risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk, RR (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.85, 1.00), p = 0.05, I(2) = 0%) with the use of PF-DES versus PC-DES. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.87, 1.08)) or non-cardiovascular mortality (RR (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.69, 1.10), p = 0.25, I(2) = 9%) between the groups. Furthermore, univariate meta-regression revealed that male gender and prior myocardial infarction were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease. According to the current meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences existed in PF-DES and PC-DES outcomes. More extensive research is needed to investigate these findings further and establish their validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10224769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102247692023-05-28 Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Khatri, Mahima Kumar, Satesh Mahfooz, Kamran Sugandh, FNU Dembra, Deepak Mehak, FNU Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias Islam, Hamza Islam, Rabia Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad Patel, Tirath Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Nomesh Varrassi, Giustino Cureus Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), and there are two types: polymer-free and polymer-coated stents. Polymer-free stents have a coating that is quickly absorbed by the body, whereas polymer-coated stents have a coating that remains on the stent surface. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of these two stent types in patients with coronary artery disease. The literature and abstracts from significant databases were reviewed to compare polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) and polymer-coated drug-eluting stents (PC-DES) for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The primary efficacy endpoints of the study were all-cause mortality and deaths from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. Among the secondary outcomes were incidences of myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). In terms of the primary outcomes, the combined analysis revealed a marginally lower risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk, RR (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.85, 1.00), p = 0.05, I(2) = 0%) with the use of PF-DES versus PC-DES. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.87, 1.08)) or non-cardiovascular mortality (RR (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.69, 1.10), p = 0.25, I(2) = 9%) between the groups. Furthermore, univariate meta-regression revealed that male gender and prior myocardial infarction were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease. According to the current meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences existed in PF-DES and PC-DES outcomes. More extensive research is needed to investigate these findings further and establish their validity. Cureus 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10224769/ /pubmed/37252538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38215 Text en Copyright © 2023, Khatri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery
Khatri, Mahima
Kumar, Satesh
Mahfooz, Kamran
Sugandh, FNU
Dembra, Deepak
Mehak, FNU
Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias
Islam, Hamza
Islam, Rabia
Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad
Patel, Tirath
Kumar, Ajay
Kumar, Nomesh
Varrassi, Giustino
Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort clinical outcomes of polymer-free versus polymer-coated drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252538
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38215
work_keys_str_mv AT khatrimahima clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kumarsatesh clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mahfoozkamran clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sugandhfnu clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dembradeepak clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mehakfnu clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rachnapanjwanigianeshwareealias clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT islamhamza clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT islamrabia clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ibnealijaffarisyedmuhammad clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pateltirath clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kumarajay clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kumarnomesh clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT varrassigiustino clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis