Cargando…
Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), and there are two types: polymer-free and polymer-coated stents. Polymer-free stents have a coating that is quickly absorbed by the body, whereas polymer-coated stents have a coating that remains on the stent surfac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38215 |
_version_ | 1785050268520415232 |
---|---|
author | Khatri, Mahima Kumar, Satesh Mahfooz, Kamran Sugandh, FNU Dembra, Deepak Mehak, FNU Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias Islam, Hamza Islam, Rabia Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad Patel, Tirath Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Nomesh Varrassi, Giustino |
author_facet | Khatri, Mahima Kumar, Satesh Mahfooz, Kamran Sugandh, FNU Dembra, Deepak Mehak, FNU Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias Islam, Hamza Islam, Rabia Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad Patel, Tirath Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Nomesh Varrassi, Giustino |
author_sort | Khatri, Mahima |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), and there are two types: polymer-free and polymer-coated stents. Polymer-free stents have a coating that is quickly absorbed by the body, whereas polymer-coated stents have a coating that remains on the stent surface. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of these two stent types in patients with coronary artery disease. The literature and abstracts from significant databases were reviewed to compare polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) and polymer-coated drug-eluting stents (PC-DES) for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The primary efficacy endpoints of the study were all-cause mortality and deaths from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. Among the secondary outcomes were incidences of myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). In terms of the primary outcomes, the combined analysis revealed a marginally lower risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk, RR (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.85, 1.00), p = 0.05, I(2) = 0%) with the use of PF-DES versus PC-DES. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.87, 1.08)) or non-cardiovascular mortality (RR (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.69, 1.10), p = 0.25, I(2) = 9%) between the groups. Furthermore, univariate meta-regression revealed that male gender and prior myocardial infarction were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease. According to the current meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences existed in PF-DES and PC-DES outcomes. More extensive research is needed to investigate these findings further and establish their validity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10224769 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102247692023-05-28 Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Khatri, Mahima Kumar, Satesh Mahfooz, Kamran Sugandh, FNU Dembra, Deepak Mehak, FNU Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias Islam, Hamza Islam, Rabia Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad Patel, Tirath Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Nomesh Varrassi, Giustino Cureus Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), and there are two types: polymer-free and polymer-coated stents. Polymer-free stents have a coating that is quickly absorbed by the body, whereas polymer-coated stents have a coating that remains on the stent surface. This meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of these two stent types in patients with coronary artery disease. The literature and abstracts from significant databases were reviewed to compare polymer-free drug-eluting stents (PF-DES) and polymer-coated drug-eluting stents (PC-DES) for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). The primary efficacy endpoints of the study were all-cause mortality and deaths from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. Among the secondary outcomes were incidences of myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), stent thrombosis, stroke, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). In terms of the primary outcomes, the combined analysis revealed a marginally lower risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk, RR (95% CI) = 0.92 (0.85, 1.00), p = 0.05, I(2) = 0%) with the use of PF-DES versus PC-DES. Nonetheless, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.87, 1.08)) or non-cardiovascular mortality (RR (95% CI) = 0.87 (0.69, 1.10), p = 0.25, I(2) = 9%) between the groups. Furthermore, univariate meta-regression revealed that male gender and prior myocardial infarction were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease. According to the current meta-analysis, no statistically significant differences existed in PF-DES and PC-DES outcomes. More extensive research is needed to investigate these findings further and establish their validity. Cureus 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10224769/ /pubmed/37252538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38215 Text en Copyright © 2023, Khatri et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Khatri, Mahima Kumar, Satesh Mahfooz, Kamran Sugandh, FNU Dembra, Deepak Mehak, FNU Rachna Panjwani, Gianeshwaree Alias Islam, Hamza Islam, Rabia Ibn e Ali Jaffari, Syed Muhammad Patel, Tirath Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Nomesh Varrassi, Giustino Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Clinical Outcomes of Polymer-Free Versus Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | clinical outcomes of polymer-free versus polymer-coated drug-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224769/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37252538 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khatrimahima clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kumarsatesh clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mahfoozkamran clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sugandhfnu clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dembradeepak clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mehakfnu clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rachnapanjwanigianeshwareealias clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT islamhamza clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT islamrabia clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ibnealijaffarisyedmuhammad clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pateltirath clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kumarajay clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kumarnomesh clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT varrassigiustino clinicaloutcomesofpolymerfreeversuspolymercoateddrugelutingstentsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydiseaseasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |