Cargando…

Evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching

BACKGROUND: The error-proneness in the preanalytical and postanalytical stages is higher than that in the analytical stage of the total testing process. However, preanalytical and postanalytical quality management has not received enough attention in medical laboratory education and tests in clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Guoying, Zhao, Chuanxiang, Yan, Mengdan, Zhang, Xiaoxian, Zhu, Ling, Liu, Jiaxiu, Zhao, Yaping, Zhang, Yuling, Cai, Weili, Xie, Hongxiang, Jiang, Yuzhang, Shao, Qixiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37245007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04272-7
_version_ 1785050270425677824
author Xu, Guoying
Zhao, Chuanxiang
Yan, Mengdan
Zhang, Xiaoxian
Zhu, Ling
Liu, Jiaxiu
Zhao, Yaping
Zhang, Yuling
Cai, Weili
Xie, Hongxiang
Jiang, Yuzhang
Shao, Qixiang
author_facet Xu, Guoying
Zhao, Chuanxiang
Yan, Mengdan
Zhang, Xiaoxian
Zhu, Ling
Liu, Jiaxiu
Zhao, Yaping
Zhang, Yuling
Cai, Weili
Xie, Hongxiang
Jiang, Yuzhang
Shao, Qixiang
author_sort Xu, Guoying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The error-proneness in the preanalytical and postanalytical stages is higher than that in the analytical stage of the total testing process. However, preanalytical and postanalytical quality management has not received enough attention in medical laboratory education and tests in clinical biochemistry courses. METHODS/APPROACH: Clinical biochemistry teaching program aim to improve students’ awareness and ability of quality management according to international organization for standardization 15,189 requirements. We designed a student-centred laboratory training program, according to case-based learning that included 4 stages: “establish an overall testing process based on the patient’s clinical indicator, clarify principles, improve operational skills, and review process and continuous improvement”. The program was implemented in our college during the winter semesters of 2019 and 2020. A total of 185 undergraduate students majoring in medical laboratory science participated in the program as a test group, and the other 172 students were set up as the control group and adopted the conventional method. The participants were asked to finish an online survey to evaluate the class at the end. RESULTS/OUTCOMES: The test group had significantly better examination scores not only in experimental operational skills (89.27 ± 7.16 vs. 77.51 ± 4.72, p < 0.05 in 2019 grade, 90.31 ± 5.35 vs. 72.87 ± 8.41 in 2020 grade) but also in total examination (83.47 ± 6.16 vs. 68.90 ± 5.86 in 2019 grade, 82.42 ± 5.72 vs. 69.55 ± 7.54 in 2020 grade) than the control group. The results of the questionnaire survey revealed that the students in the test group better achieved classroom goals than those in the control group (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The new student-centred laboratory training program based on case-based learning in clinical biochemistry is an effective and acceptable strategy compared with the conventional training program.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10224780
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102247802023-05-29 Evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching Xu, Guoying Zhao, Chuanxiang Yan, Mengdan Zhang, Xiaoxian Zhu, Ling Liu, Jiaxiu Zhao, Yaping Zhang, Yuling Cai, Weili Xie, Hongxiang Jiang, Yuzhang Shao, Qixiang BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: The error-proneness in the preanalytical and postanalytical stages is higher than that in the analytical stage of the total testing process. However, preanalytical and postanalytical quality management has not received enough attention in medical laboratory education and tests in clinical biochemistry courses. METHODS/APPROACH: Clinical biochemistry teaching program aim to improve students’ awareness and ability of quality management according to international organization for standardization 15,189 requirements. We designed a student-centred laboratory training program, according to case-based learning that included 4 stages: “establish an overall testing process based on the patient’s clinical indicator, clarify principles, improve operational skills, and review process and continuous improvement”. The program was implemented in our college during the winter semesters of 2019 and 2020. A total of 185 undergraduate students majoring in medical laboratory science participated in the program as a test group, and the other 172 students were set up as the control group and adopted the conventional method. The participants were asked to finish an online survey to evaluate the class at the end. RESULTS/OUTCOMES: The test group had significantly better examination scores not only in experimental operational skills (89.27 ± 7.16 vs. 77.51 ± 4.72, p < 0.05 in 2019 grade, 90.31 ± 5.35 vs. 72.87 ± 8.41 in 2020 grade) but also in total examination (83.47 ± 6.16 vs. 68.90 ± 5.86 in 2019 grade, 82.42 ± 5.72 vs. 69.55 ± 7.54 in 2020 grade) than the control group. The results of the questionnaire survey revealed that the students in the test group better achieved classroom goals than those in the control group (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The new student-centred laboratory training program based on case-based learning in clinical biochemistry is an effective and acceptable strategy compared with the conventional training program. BioMed Central 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10224780/ /pubmed/37245007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04272-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xu, Guoying
Zhao, Chuanxiang
Yan, Mengdan
Zhang, Xiaoxian
Zhu, Ling
Liu, Jiaxiu
Zhao, Yaping
Zhang, Yuling
Cai, Weili
Xie, Hongxiang
Jiang, Yuzhang
Shao, Qixiang
Evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching
title Evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching
title_full Evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching
title_fullStr Evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching
title_short Evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching
title_sort evaluating the effectiveness of a new student-centred laboratory training strategy in clinical biochemistry teaching
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224780/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37245007
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04272-7
work_keys_str_mv AT xuguoying evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT zhaochuanxiang evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT yanmengdan evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT zhangxiaoxian evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT zhuling evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT liujiaxiu evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT zhaoyaping evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT zhangyuling evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT caiweili evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT xiehongxiang evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT jiangyuzhang evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching
AT shaoqixiang evaluatingtheeffectivenessofanewstudentcentredlaboratorytrainingstrategyinclinicalbiochemistryteaching