Cargando…
Panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology
Panoptic Quality (PQ), designed for the task of “Panoptic Segmentation” (PS), has been used in several digital pathology challenges and publications on cell nucleus instance segmentation and classification (ISC) since its introduction in 2019. Its purpose is to encompass the detection and the segmen...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37244964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35605-7 |
_version_ | 1785050308650467328 |
---|---|
author | Foucart, Adrien Debeir, Olivier Decaestecker, Christine |
author_facet | Foucart, Adrien Debeir, Olivier Decaestecker, Christine |
author_sort | Foucart, Adrien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Panoptic Quality (PQ), designed for the task of “Panoptic Segmentation” (PS), has been used in several digital pathology challenges and publications on cell nucleus instance segmentation and classification (ISC) since its introduction in 2019. Its purpose is to encompass the detection and the segmentation aspects of the task in a single measure, so that algorithms can be ranked according to their overall performance. A careful analysis of the properties of the metric, its application to ISC and the characteristics of nucleus ISC datasets, shows that is not suitable for this purpose and should be avoided. Through a theoretical analysis we demonstrate that PS and ISC, despite their similarities, have some fundamental differences that make PQ unsuitable. We also show that the use of the Intersection over Union as a matching rule and as a segmentation quality measure within PQ is not adapted for such small objects as nuclei. We illustrate these findings with examples taken from the NuCLS and MoNuSAC datasets. The code for replicating our results is available on GitHub (https://github.com/adfoucart/panoptic-quality-suppl). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10224986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102249862023-05-29 Panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology Foucart, Adrien Debeir, Olivier Decaestecker, Christine Sci Rep Article Panoptic Quality (PQ), designed for the task of “Panoptic Segmentation” (PS), has been used in several digital pathology challenges and publications on cell nucleus instance segmentation and classification (ISC) since its introduction in 2019. Its purpose is to encompass the detection and the segmentation aspects of the task in a single measure, so that algorithms can be ranked according to their overall performance. A careful analysis of the properties of the metric, its application to ISC and the characteristics of nucleus ISC datasets, shows that is not suitable for this purpose and should be avoided. Through a theoretical analysis we demonstrate that PS and ISC, despite their similarities, have some fundamental differences that make PQ unsuitable. We also show that the use of the Intersection over Union as a matching rule and as a segmentation quality measure within PQ is not adapted for such small objects as nuclei. We illustrate these findings with examples taken from the NuCLS and MoNuSAC datasets. The code for replicating our results is available on GitHub (https://github.com/adfoucart/panoptic-quality-suppl). Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10224986/ /pubmed/37244964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35605-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Foucart, Adrien Debeir, Olivier Decaestecker, Christine Panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology |
title | Panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology |
title_full | Panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology |
title_fullStr | Panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology |
title_full_unstemmed | Panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology |
title_short | Panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology |
title_sort | panoptic quality should be avoided as a metric for assessing cell nuclei segmentation and classification in digital pathology |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10224986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37244964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35605-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foucartadrien panopticqualityshouldbeavoidedasametricforassessingcellnucleisegmentationandclassificationindigitalpathology AT debeirolivier panopticqualityshouldbeavoidedasametricforassessingcellnucleisegmentationandclassificationindigitalpathology AT decaesteckerchristine panopticqualityshouldbeavoidedasametricforassessingcellnucleisegmentationandclassificationindigitalpathology |