Cargando…
Con: Integrated 5-Year Anesthesiology Residency Should Be Implemented Widely
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
| Lenguaje: | English |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2023.05.040 |
| _version_ | 1785050319310290944 |
|---|---|
| author | Phillips, Thomas |
| author_facet | Phillips, Thomas |
| author_sort | Phillips, Thomas |
| collection | PubMed |
| description | |
| format | Online Article Text |
| id | pubmed-10225059 |
| institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023 |
| publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
| record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
| spelling | pubmed-102250592023-05-30 Con: Integrated 5-Year Anesthesiology Residency Should Be Implemented Widely Phillips, Thomas J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth Pro and Con Elsevier Inc. 2023-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10225059/ /pubmed/37336657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2023.05.040 Text en © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
| spellingShingle | Pro and Con Phillips, Thomas Con: Integrated 5-Year Anesthesiology Residency Should Be Implemented Widely |
| title | Con: Integrated 5-Year Anesthesiology Residency Should Be Implemented Widely |
| title_full | Con: Integrated 5-Year Anesthesiology Residency Should Be Implemented Widely |
| title_fullStr | Con: Integrated 5-Year Anesthesiology Residency Should Be Implemented Widely |
| title_full_unstemmed | Con: Integrated 5-Year Anesthesiology Residency Should Be Implemented Widely |
| title_short | Con: Integrated 5-Year Anesthesiology Residency Should Be Implemented Widely |
| title_sort | con: integrated 5-year anesthesiology residency should be implemented widely |
| topic | Pro and Con |
| url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37336657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2023.05.040 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT phillipsthomas conintegrated5yearanesthesiologyresidencyshouldbeimplementedwidely |