Cargando…

Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study

BACKGROUND: Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparosco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Zhuoyu, Cao, Shougen, Meng, Cheng, Liu, Xiaodong, Li, Zequn, Tian, Yulong, Yu, Junjian, Sun, Yuqi, Xu, Jianfei, Liu, Gan, Zhang, Xingqi, Yang, Hao, Zhong, Hao, Wang, Qingrui, Zhou, Yanbing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36924361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5785
_version_ 1785050342840336384
author Jia, Zhuoyu
Cao, Shougen
Meng, Cheng
Liu, Xiaodong
Li, Zequn
Tian, Yulong
Yu, Junjian
Sun, Yuqi
Xu, Jianfei
Liu, Gan
Zhang, Xingqi
Yang, Hao
Zhong, Hao
Wang, Qingrui
Zhou, Yanbing
author_facet Jia, Zhuoyu
Cao, Shougen
Meng, Cheng
Liu, Xiaodong
Li, Zequn
Tian, Yulong
Yu, Junjian
Sun, Yuqi
Xu, Jianfei
Liu, Gan
Zhang, Xingqi
Yang, Hao
Zhong, Hao
Wang, Qingrui
Zhou, Yanbing
author_sort Jia, Zhuoyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparoscopic (n = 636) total gastrectomy between October 2014 and October 2021. The two groups of patients were matched 1:3 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of the robotic (n = 147) and the laparoscopic (n = 371) groups were compared. RESULTS: After matching, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was lower (80.51 ± 68.77 vs. 89.89 ± 66.12, p = 0.008), and the total number of lymph node dissections was higher (34.74 ± 12.44 vs. 29.83 ± 12.22, p < 0.001) in the RTG group compared with the LTG group. More lymph node dissections at the upper edge of the pancreas were performed in the RTG group than in the LTG (12.59 ± 4.18 vs. 10.33 ± 4.58, p = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative recovery indicators and laboratory data were greater in the RTG group than those in the LTG group, while postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups (19.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.962). For overweight or obese patients with body mass indexes (BMIs) ≥25, certain clinical outcomes of the RTG remained advantageous, and no significant differences in three‐year overall survival (OS) or relapse‐free survival (RFS) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic total gastrectomy demonstrated better intraoperative performance, could improve the short‐term clinical outcomes of patients, and was more conducive to patient recovery. However, the long‐term efficacies of the two approaches were similar. Robotic surgical systems may reduce surgical stress responses in patients, allowing them to receive postoperative chemotherapy sooner.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10225175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102251752023-05-29 Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study Jia, Zhuoyu Cao, Shougen Meng, Cheng Liu, Xiaodong Li, Zequn Tian, Yulong Yu, Junjian Sun, Yuqi Xu, Jianfei Liu, Gan Zhang, Xingqi Yang, Hao Zhong, Hao Wang, Qingrui Zhou, Yanbing Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparoscopic (n = 636) total gastrectomy between October 2014 and October 2021. The two groups of patients were matched 1:3 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of the robotic (n = 147) and the laparoscopic (n = 371) groups were compared. RESULTS: After matching, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was lower (80.51 ± 68.77 vs. 89.89 ± 66.12, p = 0.008), and the total number of lymph node dissections was higher (34.74 ± 12.44 vs. 29.83 ± 12.22, p < 0.001) in the RTG group compared with the LTG group. More lymph node dissections at the upper edge of the pancreas were performed in the RTG group than in the LTG (12.59 ± 4.18 vs. 10.33 ± 4.58, p = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative recovery indicators and laboratory data were greater in the RTG group than those in the LTG group, while postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups (19.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.962). For overweight or obese patients with body mass indexes (BMIs) ≥25, certain clinical outcomes of the RTG remained advantageous, and no significant differences in three‐year overall survival (OS) or relapse‐free survival (RFS) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic total gastrectomy demonstrated better intraoperative performance, could improve the short‐term clinical outcomes of patients, and was more conducive to patient recovery. However, the long‐term efficacies of the two approaches were similar. Robotic surgical systems may reduce surgical stress responses in patients, allowing them to receive postoperative chemotherapy sooner. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10225175/ /pubmed/36924361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5785 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Jia, Zhuoyu
Cao, Shougen
Meng, Cheng
Liu, Xiaodong
Li, Zequn
Tian, Yulong
Yu, Junjian
Sun, Yuqi
Xu, Jianfei
Liu, Gan
Zhang, Xingqi
Yang, Hao
Zhong, Hao
Wang, Qingrui
Zhou, Yanbing
Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study
title Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study
title_full Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study
title_fullStr Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study
title_short Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study
title_sort intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36924361
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5785
work_keys_str_mv AT jiazhuoyu intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT caoshougen intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT mengcheng intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT liuxiaodong intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT lizequn intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT tianyulong intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yujunjian intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT sunyuqi intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT xujianfei intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT liugan intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhangxingqi intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT yanghao intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhonghao intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT wangqingrui intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy
AT zhouyanbing intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy