Cargando…
Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study
BACKGROUND: Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparosco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36924361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5785 |
_version_ | 1785050342840336384 |
---|---|
author | Jia, Zhuoyu Cao, Shougen Meng, Cheng Liu, Xiaodong Li, Zequn Tian, Yulong Yu, Junjian Sun, Yuqi Xu, Jianfei Liu, Gan Zhang, Xingqi Yang, Hao Zhong, Hao Wang, Qingrui Zhou, Yanbing |
author_facet | Jia, Zhuoyu Cao, Shougen Meng, Cheng Liu, Xiaodong Li, Zequn Tian, Yulong Yu, Junjian Sun, Yuqi Xu, Jianfei Liu, Gan Zhang, Xingqi Yang, Hao Zhong, Hao Wang, Qingrui Zhou, Yanbing |
author_sort | Jia, Zhuoyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparoscopic (n = 636) total gastrectomy between October 2014 and October 2021. The two groups of patients were matched 1:3 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of the robotic (n = 147) and the laparoscopic (n = 371) groups were compared. RESULTS: After matching, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was lower (80.51 ± 68.77 vs. 89.89 ± 66.12, p = 0.008), and the total number of lymph node dissections was higher (34.74 ± 12.44 vs. 29.83 ± 12.22, p < 0.001) in the RTG group compared with the LTG group. More lymph node dissections at the upper edge of the pancreas were performed in the RTG group than in the LTG (12.59 ± 4.18 vs. 10.33 ± 4.58, p = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative recovery indicators and laboratory data were greater in the RTG group than those in the LTG group, while postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups (19.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.962). For overweight or obese patients with body mass indexes (BMIs) ≥25, certain clinical outcomes of the RTG remained advantageous, and no significant differences in three‐year overall survival (OS) or relapse‐free survival (RFS) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic total gastrectomy demonstrated better intraoperative performance, could improve the short‐term clinical outcomes of patients, and was more conducive to patient recovery. However, the long‐term efficacies of the two approaches were similar. Robotic surgical systems may reduce surgical stress responses in patients, allowing them to receive postoperative chemotherapy sooner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10225175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102251752023-05-29 Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study Jia, Zhuoyu Cao, Shougen Meng, Cheng Liu, Xiaodong Li, Zequn Tian, Yulong Yu, Junjian Sun, Yuqi Xu, Jianfei Liu, Gan Zhang, Xingqi Yang, Hao Zhong, Hao Wang, Qingrui Zhou, Yanbing Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Studies on robotic total gastrectomy (RTG) are currently limited. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of RTG and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG). METHODS: A total of 969 patients underwent robotic (n = 161) or laparoscopic (n = 636) total gastrectomy between October 2014 and October 2021. The two groups of patients were matched 1:3 using the propensity score matching (PSM) method. The intraoperative performance as well as short‐ and long‐term outcomes of the robotic (n = 147) and the laparoscopic (n = 371) groups were compared. RESULTS: After matching, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was lower (80.51 ± 68.77 vs. 89.89 ± 66.12, p = 0.008), and the total number of lymph node dissections was higher (34.74 ± 12.44 vs. 29.83 ± 12.22, p < 0.001) in the RTG group compared with the LTG group. More lymph node dissections at the upper edge of the pancreas were performed in the RTG group than in the LTG (12.59 ± 4.18 vs. 10.33 ± 4.58, p = 0.001). Additionally, postoperative recovery indicators and laboratory data were greater in the RTG group than those in the LTG group, while postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups (19.0% vs. 18.9%, p = 0.962). For overweight or obese patients with body mass indexes (BMIs) ≥25, certain clinical outcomes of the RTG remained advantageous, and no significant differences in three‐year overall survival (OS) or relapse‐free survival (RFS) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic total gastrectomy demonstrated better intraoperative performance, could improve the short‐term clinical outcomes of patients, and was more conducive to patient recovery. However, the long‐term efficacies of the two approaches were similar. Robotic surgical systems may reduce surgical stress responses in patients, allowing them to receive postoperative chemotherapy sooner. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-03-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10225175/ /pubmed/36924361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5785 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Jia, Zhuoyu Cao, Shougen Meng, Cheng Liu, Xiaodong Li, Zequn Tian, Yulong Yu, Junjian Sun, Yuqi Xu, Jianfei Liu, Gan Zhang, Xingqi Yang, Hao Zhong, Hao Wang, Qingrui Zhou, Yanbing Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study |
title | Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study |
title_full | Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study |
title_short | Intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study |
title_sort | intraoperative performance and outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a high‐volume center retrospective propensity score matching study |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36924361 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jiazhuoyu intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT caoshougen intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT mengcheng intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT liuxiaodong intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT lizequn intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT tianyulong intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT yujunjian intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT sunyuqi intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT xujianfei intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT liugan intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT zhangxingqi intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT yanghao intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT zhonghao intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT wangqingrui intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy AT zhouyanbing intraoperativeperformanceandoutcomesofroboticandlaparoscopictotalgastrectomyforgastriccancerahighvolumecenterretrospectivepropensityscorematchingstudy |