Cargando…

Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the risk stratification among elderly Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients (≥60 years old) and select the beneficiaries from concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) combined with induction chemotherapy (IC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 909 elderly non‐metastati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Shuiqing, Wu, Yan‐Ling, Gao, Yongxiang, He, Danjie, Huang, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37062057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5789
_version_ 1785050347602968576
author He, Shuiqing
Wu, Yan‐Ling
Gao, Yongxiang
He, Danjie
Huang, Ying
author_facet He, Shuiqing
Wu, Yan‐Ling
Gao, Yongxiang
He, Danjie
Huang, Ying
author_sort He, Shuiqing
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the risk stratification among elderly Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients (≥60 years old) and select the beneficiaries from concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) combined with induction chemotherapy (IC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 909 elderly non‐metastatic NPC patients treated with cisplatin‐based CCRT or IC + CCRT between January 2007 and December 2016 were included. Prognostic nomograms were generated according to clinical characteristics and serum biomarkers. The survival outcomes of patients treated with CCRT versus IC + CCRT were compared in three well‐matched risk groups (high, medium, and low risk) after PSM analysis. Benefit of IC in people older or younger than 70 years and effect of different IC regimens and cycles on prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: Nomograms of overall survival (OS) (C‐index: 0.64, 95% CI, 0.61–0.89) and disease special survival (DSS) (C‐index: 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62–0.71) showed good prognostic accuracy. The nomogram for DSS included variables of age, gender, ACE, EBV DNA, N stage, and T stage. OS included variables of age, smoking history, ACE, ALB, EBV DNA, N stage, and T stage. The corresponding 5‐year OS rates of high, medium and low risk groups were 87.4%, 82.2%, and 60.9%, respectively (p < 0.001), while the 5‐year DSS rates were 92.2%, 84.3%, and 69.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the high risk group, IC + CCRT led to significantly higher 5‐year OS and DSS rate compared with CCRT (5‐year OS rate, 73.5% versus 51.8%, p = 0.006; 5‐year DSS rate, 81.4% versus 61.3%, p = 0.002). While in the medium and low risk groups, OS and DSS were not significantly different (OS: p = 0.259, 0.186; DSS: p = 0.29, 0.094). Subgroup analysis showed in the high risk group, only people younger than 70 years old could benefit from IC. TPF and IC cycles of three could lead to the best survival results. CONCLUSION: Compared with CCRT, OS, and DSS among high risk elderly patients were significantly improved by the addition of IC in patients younger than 70 years old. TPF and three IC cycles were recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10225195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102251952023-05-29 Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy He, Shuiqing Wu, Yan‐Ling Gao, Yongxiang He, Danjie Huang, Ying Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the risk stratification among elderly Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients (≥60 years old) and select the beneficiaries from concurrent chemotherapy (CCRT) combined with induction chemotherapy (IC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 909 elderly non‐metastatic NPC patients treated with cisplatin‐based CCRT or IC + CCRT between January 2007 and December 2016 were included. Prognostic nomograms were generated according to clinical characteristics and serum biomarkers. The survival outcomes of patients treated with CCRT versus IC + CCRT were compared in three well‐matched risk groups (high, medium, and low risk) after PSM analysis. Benefit of IC in people older or younger than 70 years and effect of different IC regimens and cycles on prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: Nomograms of overall survival (OS) (C‐index: 0.64, 95% CI, 0.61–0.89) and disease special survival (DSS) (C‐index: 0.65, 95% CI, 0.62–0.71) showed good prognostic accuracy. The nomogram for DSS included variables of age, gender, ACE, EBV DNA, N stage, and T stage. OS included variables of age, smoking history, ACE, ALB, EBV DNA, N stage, and T stage. The corresponding 5‐year OS rates of high, medium and low risk groups were 87.4%, 82.2%, and 60.9%, respectively (p < 0.001), while the 5‐year DSS rates were 92.2%, 84.3%, and 69.0%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the high risk group, IC + CCRT led to significantly higher 5‐year OS and DSS rate compared with CCRT (5‐year OS rate, 73.5% versus 51.8%, p = 0.006; 5‐year DSS rate, 81.4% versus 61.3%, p = 0.002). While in the medium and low risk groups, OS and DSS were not significantly different (OS: p = 0.259, 0.186; DSS: p = 0.29, 0.094). Subgroup analysis showed in the high risk group, only people younger than 70 years old could benefit from IC. TPF and IC cycles of three could lead to the best survival results. CONCLUSION: Compared with CCRT, OS, and DSS among high risk elderly patients were significantly improved by the addition of IC in patients younger than 70 years old. TPF and three IC cycles were recommended. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10225195/ /pubmed/37062057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5789 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
He, Shuiqing
Wu, Yan‐Ling
Gao, Yongxiang
He, Danjie
Huang, Ying
Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_full Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_fullStr Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_short Risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
title_sort risk stratification and beneficiary selection among elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients from concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with induction chemotherapy
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37062057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.5789
work_keys_str_mv AT heshuiqing riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy
AT wuyanling riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy
AT gaoyongxiang riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy
AT hedanjie riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy
AT huangying riskstratificationandbeneficiaryselectionamongelderlynasopharyngealcarcinomapatientsfromconcurrentchemoradiotherapycombinedwithinductionchemotherapy