Cargando…
Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
Revisions to the Common Rule and NIH policy require the use of a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) for the review of most federally funded, multisite research, with the intent of streamlining the review process. However, since initial implementation in 2018, many IRBs and institutions continu...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.517 |
_version_ | 1785050362556710912 |
---|---|
author | Green, Jonathan M. Goodman, Polly Kirby, Aaron Cobb, Nichelle Bierer, Barbara E. |
author_facet | Green, Jonathan M. Goodman, Polly Kirby, Aaron Cobb, Nichelle Bierer, Barbara E. |
author_sort | Green, Jonathan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Revisions to the Common Rule and NIH policy require the use of a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) for the review of most federally funded, multisite research, with the intent of streamlining the review process. However, since initial implementation in 2018, many IRBs and institutions continue to struggle with the logistics of implementing this requirement. In this paper, we report the findings of a workshop held in 2022 to examine why sIRB review remains problematic and propose possible solutions. Workshop participants identified several issues as major barriers, including new responsibilities for study teams, persistent duplicative review processes, the lack of harmonization of policies and practices across institutions, the absence of additional guidance from federal agencies, and the need for greater flexibility in policy requirements. Addressing these problems will require providing additional resources and training to research teams, the commitment of institutional leaders to harmonize practice, and policymakers to critically evaluate the requirement and provide flexibility in applicability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10225260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102252602023-05-29 Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions Green, Jonathan M. Goodman, Polly Kirby, Aaron Cobb, Nichelle Bierer, Barbara E. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications Revisions to the Common Rule and NIH policy require the use of a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) for the review of most federally funded, multisite research, with the intent of streamlining the review process. However, since initial implementation in 2018, many IRBs and institutions continue to struggle with the logistics of implementing this requirement. In this paper, we report the findings of a workshop held in 2022 to examine why sIRB review remains problematic and propose possible solutions. Workshop participants identified several issues as major barriers, including new responsibilities for study teams, persistent duplicative review processes, the lack of harmonization of policies and practices across institutions, the absence of additional guidance from federal agencies, and the need for greater flexibility in policy requirements. Addressing these problems will require providing additional resources and training to research teams, the commitment of institutional leaders to harmonize practice, and policymakers to critically evaluate the requirement and provide flexibility in applicability. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10225260/ /pubmed/37250991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.517 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Special Communications Green, Jonathan M. Goodman, Polly Kirby, Aaron Cobb, Nichelle Bierer, Barbara E. Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions |
title | Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions |
title_full | Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions |
title_fullStr | Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions |
title_short | Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions |
title_sort | implementation of single irb review for multisite human subjects research: persistent challenges and possible solutions |
topic | Special Communications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenjonathanm implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions AT goodmanpolly implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions AT kirbyaaron implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions AT cobbnichelle implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions AT biererbarbarae implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions |