Cargando…

Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions

Revisions to the Common Rule and NIH policy require the use of a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) for the review of most federally funded, multisite research, with the intent of streamlining the review process. However, since initial implementation in 2018, many IRBs and institutions continu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Green, Jonathan M., Goodman, Polly, Kirby, Aaron, Cobb, Nichelle, Bierer, Barbara E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.517
_version_ 1785050362556710912
author Green, Jonathan M.
Goodman, Polly
Kirby, Aaron
Cobb, Nichelle
Bierer, Barbara E.
author_facet Green, Jonathan M.
Goodman, Polly
Kirby, Aaron
Cobb, Nichelle
Bierer, Barbara E.
author_sort Green, Jonathan M.
collection PubMed
description Revisions to the Common Rule and NIH policy require the use of a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) for the review of most federally funded, multisite research, with the intent of streamlining the review process. However, since initial implementation in 2018, many IRBs and institutions continue to struggle with the logistics of implementing this requirement. In this paper, we report the findings of a workshop held in 2022 to examine why sIRB review remains problematic and propose possible solutions. Workshop participants identified several issues as major barriers, including new responsibilities for study teams, persistent duplicative review processes, the lack of harmonization of policies and practices across institutions, the absence of additional guidance from federal agencies, and the need for greater flexibility in policy requirements. Addressing these problems will require providing additional resources and training to research teams, the commitment of institutional leaders to harmonize practice, and policymakers to critically evaluate the requirement and provide flexibility in applicability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10225260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102252602023-05-29 Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions Green, Jonathan M. Goodman, Polly Kirby, Aaron Cobb, Nichelle Bierer, Barbara E. J Clin Transl Sci Special Communications Revisions to the Common Rule and NIH policy require the use of a single Institutional Review Board (sIRB) for the review of most federally funded, multisite research, with the intent of streamlining the review process. However, since initial implementation in 2018, many IRBs and institutions continue to struggle with the logistics of implementing this requirement. In this paper, we report the findings of a workshop held in 2022 to examine why sIRB review remains problematic and propose possible solutions. Workshop participants identified several issues as major barriers, including new responsibilities for study teams, persistent duplicative review processes, the lack of harmonization of policies and practices across institutions, the absence of additional guidance from federal agencies, and the need for greater flexibility in policy requirements. Addressing these problems will require providing additional resources and training to research teams, the commitment of institutional leaders to harmonize practice, and policymakers to critically evaluate the requirement and provide flexibility in applicability. Cambridge University Press 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10225260/ /pubmed/37250991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.517 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Communications
Green, Jonathan M.
Goodman, Polly
Kirby, Aaron
Cobb, Nichelle
Bierer, Barbara E.
Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
title Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
title_full Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
title_fullStr Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
title_short Implementation of single IRB review for multisite human subjects research: Persistent challenges and possible solutions
title_sort implementation of single irb review for multisite human subjects research: persistent challenges and possible solutions
topic Special Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37250991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.517
work_keys_str_mv AT greenjonathanm implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions
AT goodmanpolly implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions
AT kirbyaaron implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions
AT cobbnichelle implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions
AT biererbarbarae implementationofsingleirbreviewformultisitehumansubjectsresearchpersistentchallengesandpossiblesolutions