Cargando…
Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations
BACKGROUND: Sexual stimuli, such as sexual videos, images, and narratives describing sexual interactions, are one of many tools used by clinicians and researchers to elicit or augment sexual response. Given the wide variability within sexual stimuli and their effects on sexual response, we provide g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfad012 |
_version_ | 1785050380068978688 |
---|---|
author | Katz, Maddie A Penniston, Trinda L Barry, Caitlin Micanovic, Nina Seto, Michael C Chivers, Meredith L |
author_facet | Katz, Maddie A Penniston, Trinda L Barry, Caitlin Micanovic, Nina Seto, Michael C Chivers, Meredith L |
author_sort | Katz, Maddie A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sexual stimuli, such as sexual videos, images, and narratives describing sexual interactions, are one of many tools used by clinicians and researchers to elicit or augment sexual response. Given the wide variability within sexual stimuli and their effects on sexual response, we provide guidance on when and how to use sexual stimuli, selecting sexual stimuli, and standardizing the use and reporting of sexual stimuli in research and clinical practice. AIM: This expert opinion review article discusses standard operating procedures when using sexual stimuli in clinical and research applications, addressing 3 broad areas: settings in which sexual stimuli are used, characteristics and contexts of the stimuli, and practical and ethical considerations when using the stimuli. METHODS: This article is based on an expert opinion review of the sexual psychophysiology literature. RESULTS: First, we discuss the settings in which sexual stimuli are typically used and evaluate the ecological validity of each setting. Second, we review the types of sexual stimuli used in sexual response research, including physical characteristics, depicted sexual activity, and context, and the impacts of these characteristics on sexual response. Last, we discuss the practical and ethical considerations that come with the choice and use of sexual stimuli in clinical and research settings. We address potential limitations of certain sexual stimuli, including practical and ethical considerations such as participant vs experimenter choice, diversity and representation, and proper sourcing of sexual stimuli for use in clinical and research applications. Discussions on the future applications of sexual stimuli, such as the use of virtual reality, and ethical considerations in terms of user-generated Internet sexual stimuli are also explored. CONCLUSION: We provide an expert opinion review of the literature regarding use of sexual stimuli for clinical and research applications and offer best use practices and recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10225467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102254672023-05-30 Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations Katz, Maddie A Penniston, Trinda L Barry, Caitlin Micanovic, Nina Seto, Michael C Chivers, Meredith L Sex Med Review BACKGROUND: Sexual stimuli, such as sexual videos, images, and narratives describing sexual interactions, are one of many tools used by clinicians and researchers to elicit or augment sexual response. Given the wide variability within sexual stimuli and their effects on sexual response, we provide guidance on when and how to use sexual stimuli, selecting sexual stimuli, and standardizing the use and reporting of sexual stimuli in research and clinical practice. AIM: This expert opinion review article discusses standard operating procedures when using sexual stimuli in clinical and research applications, addressing 3 broad areas: settings in which sexual stimuli are used, characteristics and contexts of the stimuli, and practical and ethical considerations when using the stimuli. METHODS: This article is based on an expert opinion review of the sexual psychophysiology literature. RESULTS: First, we discuss the settings in which sexual stimuli are typically used and evaluate the ecological validity of each setting. Second, we review the types of sexual stimuli used in sexual response research, including physical characteristics, depicted sexual activity, and context, and the impacts of these characteristics on sexual response. Last, we discuss the practical and ethical considerations that come with the choice and use of sexual stimuli in clinical and research settings. We address potential limitations of certain sexual stimuli, including practical and ethical considerations such as participant vs experimenter choice, diversity and representation, and proper sourcing of sexual stimuli for use in clinical and research applications. Discussions on the future applications of sexual stimuli, such as the use of virtual reality, and ethical considerations in terms of user-generated Internet sexual stimuli are also explored. CONCLUSION: We provide an expert opinion review of the literature regarding use of sexual stimuli for clinical and research applications and offer best use practices and recommendations. Oxford University Press 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10225467/ /pubmed/37256214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfad012 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society of Sexual Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Review Katz, Maddie A Penniston, Trinda L Barry, Caitlin Micanovic, Nina Seto, Michael C Chivers, Meredith L Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations |
title | Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations |
title_full | Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations |
title_fullStr | Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations |
title_short | Use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations |
title_sort | use of sexual stimuli in research and clinical settings: expert opinion and recommendations |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256214 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfad012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katzmaddiea useofsexualstimuliinresearchandclinicalsettingsexpertopinionandrecommendations AT pennistontrindal useofsexualstimuliinresearchandclinicalsettingsexpertopinionandrecommendations AT barrycaitlin useofsexualstimuliinresearchandclinicalsettingsexpertopinionandrecommendations AT micanovicnina useofsexualstimuliinresearchandclinicalsettingsexpertopinionandrecommendations AT setomichaelc useofsexualstimuliinresearchandclinicalsettingsexpertopinionandrecommendations AT chiversmeredithl useofsexualstimuliinresearchandclinicalsettingsexpertopinionandrecommendations |