Cargando…

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia

PURPOSE: The incidence of seroma and postoperative pain after Gilbert type III inguinal hernia repair is high. To reduce postoperative complications, this study investigated the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Binyu, Luo, Qin, Zhang, Xiao, Zhang, Daquan, Zhang, Qing, Guo, Jing, Yu, Yunhong, Tian, Mingyang, Ren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1190788
_version_ 1785050394390429696
author Binyu, Luo
Qin, Zhang
Xiao, Zhang
Daquan, Zhang
Qing, Guo
Jing, Yu
Yunhong, Tian
Mingyang, Ren
author_facet Binyu, Luo
Qin, Zhang
Xiao, Zhang
Daquan, Zhang
Qing, Guo
Jing, Yu
Yunhong, Tian
Mingyang, Ren
author_sort Binyu, Luo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The incidence of seroma and postoperative pain after Gilbert type III inguinal hernia repair is high. To reduce postoperative complications, this study investigated the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia. METHODS: Through a prospective randomized controlled study, a total of 193 patients with Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia admitted to Nanchong Central Hospital affiliated with Chuanbei Medical College from May 2020 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the inner ring closed group (85 patients) and the inner ring non-closed group (95 patients). The patients in both groups underwent laparoscopic tension-free repair of their inguinal hernias. General information such as operative time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital cost were compared between the two groups, and the patients were followed up at 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days and then 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery to compare complications such as incidence of seroma, volume of the seroma fluid, incidence of pain, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. RESULTS: There was no conversion to open procedures in any of the patients. The operation time of the closed group was significantly longer than that of the non-closed group (64.2 ± 12.2 vs. 55.3 ± 9.5 min, P < 0.01). The proportion of patients with postoperative pain in the two groups was 39 (46%) vs. 59 (62%), P = 0.029 on 7 days; 17 (20%) vs. 33 (35%), P = 0.028 on 14 days; and 6 (7%) vs. 22 (23%), P = 0.003 on 21 days in the postoperative closed group and was significantly lower than that in the non-closed group, while we found that the non-closed group had a higher VAS pain score than that of the closed group (2.36 ± 0.61 vs. 1.95 ± 0.71, P = 0.003 on 7 days and 2.12 ± 0.49 vs. 1.65 ± 0.49, P = 0.002 on 14 days) after surgery according to the statistical results of the VAS pain score. The incidence of postoperative seroma and the amount of seroma fluid decreased gradually in both groups, but when comparing the two groups, the proportion of cases of seroma in the closed group on 7 days [45 (53%) vs. 79 (83%), P < 0.01]; 14 days [23 (27%) vs. 43 (45%), P = 0.011]; and 21 days [10 (12%) vs. 29 (31%), P = 0.002] after the operation were significantly less than that in the non-closed group. For the comparison of the amount of seroma fluid between the groups, the seroma fluid volume in the non-closed group was greater than that in the closed group (34.48 ± 20.40 vs. 43.87 ± 16.40 ml, P = 0.006, 7 days) and (21.79 ± 8.42 vs. 30.74 ± 10.39 ml, P = 0.002, 14 days) after surgery. There were no differences in the length of stay, total hospital costs, or postoperative complications (urinary retention, intestinal obstruction, nausea, vomiting, bleeding, and infection) between the two groups, and the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The postoperative follow-up period was 3–20 months, and no chronic pain or recurrence occurred during the postoperative follow-up period in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Closure of the hernia ring is safe and effective for laparoscopic hernia repair for Gilbert type III inguinal hernia, and it significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative seroma and further reduces the postoperative pain without increasing the risk of postoperative infection and recurrence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10225536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102255362023-05-30 Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia Binyu, Luo Qin, Zhang Xiao, Zhang Daquan, Zhang Qing, Guo Jing, Yu Yunhong, Tian Mingyang, Ren Front Surg Surgery PURPOSE: The incidence of seroma and postoperative pain after Gilbert type III inguinal hernia repair is high. To reduce postoperative complications, this study investigated the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia. METHODS: Through a prospective randomized controlled study, a total of 193 patients with Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia admitted to Nanchong Central Hospital affiliated with Chuanbei Medical College from May 2020 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into the inner ring closed group (85 patients) and the inner ring non-closed group (95 patients). The patients in both groups underwent laparoscopic tension-free repair of their inguinal hernias. General information such as operative time, postoperative hospital stay, and hospital cost were compared between the two groups, and the patients were followed up at 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days and then 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery to compare complications such as incidence of seroma, volume of the seroma fluid, incidence of pain, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. RESULTS: There was no conversion to open procedures in any of the patients. The operation time of the closed group was significantly longer than that of the non-closed group (64.2 ± 12.2 vs. 55.3 ± 9.5 min, P < 0.01). The proportion of patients with postoperative pain in the two groups was 39 (46%) vs. 59 (62%), P = 0.029 on 7 days; 17 (20%) vs. 33 (35%), P = 0.028 on 14 days; and 6 (7%) vs. 22 (23%), P = 0.003 on 21 days in the postoperative closed group and was significantly lower than that in the non-closed group, while we found that the non-closed group had a higher VAS pain score than that of the closed group (2.36 ± 0.61 vs. 1.95 ± 0.71, P = 0.003 on 7 days and 2.12 ± 0.49 vs. 1.65 ± 0.49, P = 0.002 on 14 days) after surgery according to the statistical results of the VAS pain score. The incidence of postoperative seroma and the amount of seroma fluid decreased gradually in both groups, but when comparing the two groups, the proportion of cases of seroma in the closed group on 7 days [45 (53%) vs. 79 (83%), P < 0.01]; 14 days [23 (27%) vs. 43 (45%), P = 0.011]; and 21 days [10 (12%) vs. 29 (31%), P = 0.002] after the operation were significantly less than that in the non-closed group. For the comparison of the amount of seroma fluid between the groups, the seroma fluid volume in the non-closed group was greater than that in the closed group (34.48 ± 20.40 vs. 43.87 ± 16.40 ml, P = 0.006, 7 days) and (21.79 ± 8.42 vs. 30.74 ± 10.39 ml, P = 0.002, 14 days) after surgery. There were no differences in the length of stay, total hospital costs, or postoperative complications (urinary retention, intestinal obstruction, nausea, vomiting, bleeding, and infection) between the two groups, and the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The postoperative follow-up period was 3–20 months, and no chronic pain or recurrence occurred during the postoperative follow-up period in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Closure of the hernia ring is safe and effective for laparoscopic hernia repair for Gilbert type III inguinal hernia, and it significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative seroma and further reduces the postoperative pain without increasing the risk of postoperative infection and recurrence. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10225536/ /pubmed/37255745 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1190788 Text en © 2023 Binyu, Qin, Xiao, Daquan, Qing, Jing, Yunhong and Mingyang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Binyu, Luo
Qin, Zhang
Xiao, Zhang
Daquan, Zhang
Qing, Guo
Jing, Yu
Yunhong, Tian
Mingyang, Ren
Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia
title Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia
title_full Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia
title_short Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for Gilbert type III indirect inguinal hernia
title_sort clinical efficacy of laparoscopic closed hernia ring combined with a patch repair for gilbert type iii indirect inguinal hernia
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255745
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1190788
work_keys_str_mv AT binyuluo clinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicclosedherniaringcombinedwithapatchrepairforgilberttypeiiiindirectinguinalhernia
AT qinzhang clinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicclosedherniaringcombinedwithapatchrepairforgilberttypeiiiindirectinguinalhernia
AT xiaozhang clinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicclosedherniaringcombinedwithapatchrepairforgilberttypeiiiindirectinguinalhernia
AT daquanzhang clinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicclosedherniaringcombinedwithapatchrepairforgilberttypeiiiindirectinguinalhernia
AT qingguo clinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicclosedherniaringcombinedwithapatchrepairforgilberttypeiiiindirectinguinalhernia
AT jingyu clinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicclosedherniaringcombinedwithapatchrepairforgilberttypeiiiindirectinguinalhernia
AT yunhongtian clinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicclosedherniaringcombinedwithapatchrepairforgilberttypeiiiindirectinguinalhernia
AT mingyangren clinicalefficacyoflaparoscopicclosedherniaringcombinedwithapatchrepairforgilberttypeiiiindirectinguinalhernia