Cargando…

Omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 or BA.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants

BACKGROUND: Immune imprinting is a phenomenon in which a person's immune system develops a specific immunological memory of the pathogen or vaccine due to a previous exposure. This memory basically leads to a faster and stronger immune response in a subsequent contact to the same pathogen or va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sonnleitner, Sissy Therese, Walder, Samira, Knabl, Ludwig, Poernbacher, Roswitha, Tschurtschenthaler, Thomas, Hinterbichler, Eva, Sonnleitner, Stefanie, Muehlmann, Viktoria, Posch, Wilfried, Walder, Gernot
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1165769
_version_ 1785050419846709248
author Sonnleitner, Sissy Therese
Walder, Samira
Knabl, Ludwig
Poernbacher, Roswitha
Tschurtschenthaler, Thomas
Hinterbichler, Eva
Sonnleitner, Stefanie
Muehlmann, Viktoria
Posch, Wilfried
Walder, Gernot
author_facet Sonnleitner, Sissy Therese
Walder, Samira
Knabl, Ludwig
Poernbacher, Roswitha
Tschurtschenthaler, Thomas
Hinterbichler, Eva
Sonnleitner, Stefanie
Muehlmann, Viktoria
Posch, Wilfried
Walder, Gernot
author_sort Sonnleitner, Sissy Therese
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immune imprinting is a phenomenon in which a person's immune system develops a specific immunological memory of the pathogen or vaccine due to a previous exposure. This memory basically leads to a faster and stronger immune response in a subsequent contact to the same pathogen or vaccine. However, what happens if the pathogen has changed considerably in the meantime due to mutations in the main target region of antibodies, as in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 from the ancestral strain to B.1.1.529 (Omicron)? In this case, does immune imprinting also confer an advantage in repeated contact and does it lead to a stronger immune response? METHODS: To clarify these questions, we investigated the effects of immune imprinting in the context of SARS-CoV-2 by comparing a group of previously infection-naïve versus imprinted study participants and determined differences in humoral and cellular immune responses during and after infection with strain SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 BA.1 and BA.2, respectively. We used a commercial CLIA, immunoblots, IFN-γ ELISpots and a plaque-reduction neutralization test to generate a clear and comparable picture of the humoral and cellular immune response in the two study groups. RESULTS: Imprinted participants developed significantly higher antibody titers and showed significantly stronger neutralization capacity against the ancestral strain, BA.1 and BA.5. The immune response of naïve study participants was narrower and related mainly to the receptor-binding domain, which resulted in a lower neutralization capacity against other strains including BA.5. Naïve study participants showed a significantly higher cellular immune response than the imprinted study group, indicating a higher antigenic challenge. The cellular immune response was directed against general structures of SARS-CoV-2 and not specifically against the receptor-binding domain. CONCLUSION: Viral variant infection elicits variant-specific antibodies and prior mRNA vaccination or infection with a previous SARS-CoV-2 variant imprints serological responses toward the ancestral strain rather than variant antigens. On the other hand, our study shows that the initially higher specific antibody titers due to former imprinting via vaccination or prior infection significantly increased the humoral immune response, and therefore outperformed the humoral immune response of naïve study participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10225645
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102256452023-05-30 Omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 or BA.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants Sonnleitner, Sissy Therese Walder, Samira Knabl, Ludwig Poernbacher, Roswitha Tschurtschenthaler, Thomas Hinterbichler, Eva Sonnleitner, Stefanie Muehlmann, Viktoria Posch, Wilfried Walder, Gernot Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Immune imprinting is a phenomenon in which a person's immune system develops a specific immunological memory of the pathogen or vaccine due to a previous exposure. This memory basically leads to a faster and stronger immune response in a subsequent contact to the same pathogen or vaccine. However, what happens if the pathogen has changed considerably in the meantime due to mutations in the main target region of antibodies, as in the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 from the ancestral strain to B.1.1.529 (Omicron)? In this case, does immune imprinting also confer an advantage in repeated contact and does it lead to a stronger immune response? METHODS: To clarify these questions, we investigated the effects of immune imprinting in the context of SARS-CoV-2 by comparing a group of previously infection-naïve versus imprinted study participants and determined differences in humoral and cellular immune responses during and after infection with strain SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 BA.1 and BA.2, respectively. We used a commercial CLIA, immunoblots, IFN-γ ELISpots and a plaque-reduction neutralization test to generate a clear and comparable picture of the humoral and cellular immune response in the two study groups. RESULTS: Imprinted participants developed significantly higher antibody titers and showed significantly stronger neutralization capacity against the ancestral strain, BA.1 and BA.5. The immune response of naïve study participants was narrower and related mainly to the receptor-binding domain, which resulted in a lower neutralization capacity against other strains including BA.5. Naïve study participants showed a significantly higher cellular immune response than the imprinted study group, indicating a higher antigenic challenge. The cellular immune response was directed against general structures of SARS-CoV-2 and not specifically against the receptor-binding domain. CONCLUSION: Viral variant infection elicits variant-specific antibodies and prior mRNA vaccination or infection with a previous SARS-CoV-2 variant imprints serological responses toward the ancestral strain rather than variant antigens. On the other hand, our study shows that the initially higher specific antibody titers due to former imprinting via vaccination or prior infection significantly increased the humoral immune response, and therefore outperformed the humoral immune response of naïve study participants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10225645/ /pubmed/37256137 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1165769 Text en Copyright © 2023 Sonnleitner, Walder, Knabl, Poernbacher, Tschurtschenthaler, Hinterbichler, Sonnleitner, Muehlmann, Posch and Walder https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Sonnleitner, Sissy Therese
Walder, Samira
Knabl, Ludwig
Poernbacher, Roswitha
Tschurtschenthaler, Thomas
Hinterbichler, Eva
Sonnleitner, Stefanie
Muehlmann, Viktoria
Posch, Wilfried
Walder, Gernot
Omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 or BA.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants
title Omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 or BA.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants
title_full Omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 or BA.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants
title_fullStr Omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 or BA.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants
title_full_unstemmed Omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 or BA.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants
title_short Omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1 or BA.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants
title_sort omicron (b.1.1.529) ba.1 or ba.2-related effects on immune responses in previously naïve versus imprinted individuals: immune imprinting as an advantage in the humoral immune response against novel variants
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225645/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256137
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1165769
work_keys_str_mv AT sonnleitnersissytherese omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT waldersamira omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT knablludwig omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT poernbacherroswitha omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT tschurtschenthalerthomas omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT hinterbichlereva omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT sonnleitnerstefanie omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT muehlmannviktoria omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT poschwilfried omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants
AT waldergernot omicronb11529ba1orba2relatedeffectsonimmuneresponsesinpreviouslynaiveversusimprintedindividualsimmuneimprintingasanadvantageinthehumoralimmuneresponseagainstnovelvariants