Cargando…

Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the current evidence on electroacupuncture as an effective and safe therapy for cancer pain management. METHODS: Five databases were searched from their inception through November 11, 2022. Only the randomized controlled trials that meet the eligibility criteria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Junning, Wu, Weizhen, Ren, Yuehan, Yuan, Yi, Jia, Liqun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1186506
_version_ 1785050428992389120
author Zhang, Junning
Wu, Weizhen
Ren, Yuehan
Yuan, Yi
Jia, Liqun
author_facet Zhang, Junning
Wu, Weizhen
Ren, Yuehan
Yuan, Yi
Jia, Liqun
author_sort Zhang, Junning
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the current evidence on electroacupuncture as an effective and safe therapy for cancer pain management. METHODS: Five databases were searched from their inception through November 11, 2022. Only the randomized controlled trials that meet the eligibility criteria were finally included in the study. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, and RevMan 5.3 used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. We used 8 indicators to estimate the meta-analysis results, most of which proved statistically significant, including VAS scores, NRS scores, and KPS scores. To be specific, VAS scores (MD = −1.41, 95% CI: −2.42 to −0.41, P = 0.006) and NRS scores (MD = −1.19, 95% CI: −1.72 to −0.66, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group. The treatment group's KPS scores (MD = 5.48, 95% CI: 3.27 to 7.69, P < 0.00001) were higher than those of the control group. Also, in the treatment group, the number of burst pain (MD = −2.66, 95% CI: −3.32 to −1.99, P < 0.00001) and side effect rates (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.67, P < 0.00001) greatly reduced, while the response rate (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.26, P < 0.0001) significantly increased compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the advantages of electroacupuncture in the treatment of cancer pain. Meanwhile, rigorous RCTs should be designed and conducted in the future to further demonstrate the exact efficacy of electroacupuncture. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022376148.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10225685
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102256852023-05-30 Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Zhang, Junning Wu, Weizhen Ren, Yuehan Yuan, Yi Jia, Liqun Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the current evidence on electroacupuncture as an effective and safe therapy for cancer pain management. METHODS: Five databases were searched from their inception through November 11, 2022. Only the randomized controlled trials that meet the eligibility criteria were finally included in the study. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, and RevMan 5.3 used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. We used 8 indicators to estimate the meta-analysis results, most of which proved statistically significant, including VAS scores, NRS scores, and KPS scores. To be specific, VAS scores (MD = −1.41, 95% CI: −2.42 to −0.41, P = 0.006) and NRS scores (MD = −1.19, 95% CI: −1.72 to −0.66, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group. The treatment group's KPS scores (MD = 5.48, 95% CI: 3.27 to 7.69, P < 0.00001) were higher than those of the control group. Also, in the treatment group, the number of burst pain (MD = −2.66, 95% CI: −3.32 to −1.99, P < 0.00001) and side effect rates (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.67, P < 0.00001) greatly reduced, while the response rate (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.26, P < 0.0001) significantly increased compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the advantages of electroacupuncture in the treatment of cancer pain. Meanwhile, rigorous RCTs should be designed and conducted in the future to further demonstrate the exact efficacy of electroacupuncture. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022376148. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10225685/ /pubmed/37255718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1186506 Text en © 2023 Zhang, Wu, Ren, Yuan and Jia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pain Research
Zhang, Junning
Wu, Weizhen
Ren, Yuehan
Yuan, Yi
Jia, Liqun
Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_fullStr Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_short Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_sort electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
topic Pain Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255718
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1186506
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjunning electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT wuweizhen electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT renyuehan electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT yuanyi electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT jialiqun electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials