Cargando…
Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the current evidence on electroacupuncture as an effective and safe therapy for cancer pain management. METHODS: Five databases were searched from their inception through November 11, 2022. Only the randomized controlled trials that meet the eligibility criteria...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1186506 |
_version_ | 1785050428992389120 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Junning Wu, Weizhen Ren, Yuehan Yuan, Yi Jia, Liqun |
author_facet | Zhang, Junning Wu, Weizhen Ren, Yuehan Yuan, Yi Jia, Liqun |
author_sort | Zhang, Junning |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the current evidence on electroacupuncture as an effective and safe therapy for cancer pain management. METHODS: Five databases were searched from their inception through November 11, 2022. Only the randomized controlled trials that meet the eligibility criteria were finally included in the study. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, and RevMan 5.3 used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. We used 8 indicators to estimate the meta-analysis results, most of which proved statistically significant, including VAS scores, NRS scores, and KPS scores. To be specific, VAS scores (MD = −1.41, 95% CI: −2.42 to −0.41, P = 0.006) and NRS scores (MD = −1.19, 95% CI: −1.72 to −0.66, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group. The treatment group's KPS scores (MD = 5.48, 95% CI: 3.27 to 7.69, P < 0.00001) were higher than those of the control group. Also, in the treatment group, the number of burst pain (MD = −2.66, 95% CI: −3.32 to −1.99, P < 0.00001) and side effect rates (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.67, P < 0.00001) greatly reduced, while the response rate (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.26, P < 0.0001) significantly increased compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the advantages of electroacupuncture in the treatment of cancer pain. Meanwhile, rigorous RCTs should be designed and conducted in the future to further demonstrate the exact efficacy of electroacupuncture. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022376148. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10225685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102256852023-05-30 Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Zhang, Junning Wu, Weizhen Ren, Yuehan Yuan, Yi Jia, Liqun Front Pain Res (Lausanne) Pain Research OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to review the current evidence on electroacupuncture as an effective and safe therapy for cancer pain management. METHODS: Five databases were searched from their inception through November 11, 2022. Only the randomized controlled trials that meet the eligibility criteria were finally included in the study. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers, and RevMan 5.3 used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 17 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. We used 8 indicators to estimate the meta-analysis results, most of which proved statistically significant, including VAS scores, NRS scores, and KPS scores. To be specific, VAS scores (MD = −1.41, 95% CI: −2.42 to −0.41, P = 0.006) and NRS scores (MD = −1.19, 95% CI: −1.72 to −0.66, P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in the treatment group compared to the control group. The treatment group's KPS scores (MD = 5.48, 95% CI: 3.27 to 7.69, P < 0.00001) were higher than those of the control group. Also, in the treatment group, the number of burst pain (MD = −2.66, 95% CI: −3.32 to −1.99, P < 0.00001) and side effect rates (RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0.67, P < 0.00001) greatly reduced, while the response rate (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.26, P < 0.0001) significantly increased compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the advantages of electroacupuncture in the treatment of cancer pain. Meanwhile, rigorous RCTs should be designed and conducted in the future to further demonstrate the exact efficacy of electroacupuncture. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022376148. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10225685/ /pubmed/37255718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1186506 Text en © 2023 Zhang, Wu, Ren, Yuan and Jia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pain Research Zhang, Junning Wu, Weizhen Ren, Yuehan Yuan, Yi Jia, Liqun Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title | Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full | Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_fullStr | Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_short | Electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_sort | electroacupuncture for the treatment of cancer pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials |
topic | Pain Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255718 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2023.1186506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjunning electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT wuweizhen electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT renyuehan electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT yuanyi electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials AT jialiqun electroacupunctureforthetreatmentofcancerpainasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials |