Cargando…

Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety

Water-borne diseases are usually caused by the fecal–oral transmission of human fecal pathogens. Traditionally, coliforms and enterococci are widely used as indicator bacteria, but they do not allow to differentiate between human and animal fecal contamination. Owing to its presence only in the huma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, So-Young, Yang, Jihye, Lee, Ju-Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1185788
_version_ 1785050440163917824
author Lee, So-Young
Yang, Jihye
Lee, Ju-Hoon
author_facet Lee, So-Young
Yang, Jihye
Lee, Ju-Hoon
author_sort Lee, So-Young
collection PubMed
description Water-borne diseases are usually caused by the fecal–oral transmission of human fecal pathogens. Traditionally, coliforms and enterococci are widely used as indicator bacteria, but they do not allow to differentiate between human and animal fecal contamination. Owing to its presence only in the human gut environment, crAssphage has been suggested as an alternative indicator of human fecal contamination to overcome the above challenges. In this study, 139 human and 89 animal fecal samples (e.g., chicken, cow, dog, pig, pigeon, and mouse) were collected. For the rapid detection of human crAssphage in fecal samples, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using five different oligonucleotide primer/probe combinations. These included three previously reported oligonucleotide primer/probe combinations (RQ, CPQ056, and CrAssBP) and two newly developed combinations (ORF00018-targeting CrAssPFL1 and ORF00044-targeting CrAssPFL2). The detection rate (crAssphage-positive rate) in human fecal samples were 23.0, 30.2, 28.8, 20.1, and 30.9%, respectively, suggesting CrAssPFL2 showed the highest detection rate. Furthermore, the lowest copy numbers (436.16 copy numbers) could be detected using the CrAssPFL2 combination. Interestingly, no difference in crAssphage detection rates was found between healthy people and intestinal inflammatory patients. As expected, no crAssphage was detected in any animal fecal samples, indicating its human specificity. Furthermore, qPCR analysis of sewage samples collected from five different sewage treatment plants revealed that they were all contaminated with 10(5.71) copy numbers/mL of crAssphage on average. The simulation test of crAssphage-contaminated food samples also confirmed that the detection limit was from 10(7.55) copy numbers of crAssphage in foods. Therefore, the newly developed and optimized qPCR would be useful for the sensitive detection of crAssphage while identifying the source of human fecal contamination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10225732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102257322023-05-30 Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety Lee, So-Young Yang, Jihye Lee, Ju-Hoon Front Microbiol Microbiology Water-borne diseases are usually caused by the fecal–oral transmission of human fecal pathogens. Traditionally, coliforms and enterococci are widely used as indicator bacteria, but they do not allow to differentiate between human and animal fecal contamination. Owing to its presence only in the human gut environment, crAssphage has been suggested as an alternative indicator of human fecal contamination to overcome the above challenges. In this study, 139 human and 89 animal fecal samples (e.g., chicken, cow, dog, pig, pigeon, and mouse) were collected. For the rapid detection of human crAssphage in fecal samples, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using five different oligonucleotide primer/probe combinations. These included three previously reported oligonucleotide primer/probe combinations (RQ, CPQ056, and CrAssBP) and two newly developed combinations (ORF00018-targeting CrAssPFL1 and ORF00044-targeting CrAssPFL2). The detection rate (crAssphage-positive rate) in human fecal samples were 23.0, 30.2, 28.8, 20.1, and 30.9%, respectively, suggesting CrAssPFL2 showed the highest detection rate. Furthermore, the lowest copy numbers (436.16 copy numbers) could be detected using the CrAssPFL2 combination. Interestingly, no difference in crAssphage detection rates was found between healthy people and intestinal inflammatory patients. As expected, no crAssphage was detected in any animal fecal samples, indicating its human specificity. Furthermore, qPCR analysis of sewage samples collected from five different sewage treatment plants revealed that they were all contaminated with 10(5.71) copy numbers/mL of crAssphage on average. The simulation test of crAssphage-contaminated food samples also confirmed that the detection limit was from 10(7.55) copy numbers of crAssphage in foods. Therefore, the newly developed and optimized qPCR would be useful for the sensitive detection of crAssphage while identifying the source of human fecal contamination. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10225732/ /pubmed/37256047 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1185788 Text en Copyright © 2023 Lee, Yang and Lee. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Lee, So-Young
Yang, Jihye
Lee, Ju-Hoon
Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety
title Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety
title_full Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety
title_fullStr Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety
title_short Improvement of crAssphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety
title_sort improvement of crassphage detection/quantification method and its extensive application for food safety
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256047
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1185788
work_keys_str_mv AT leesoyoung improvementofcrassphagedetectionquantificationmethodanditsextensiveapplicationforfoodsafety
AT yangjihye improvementofcrassphagedetectionquantificationmethodanditsextensiveapplicationforfoodsafety
AT leejuhoon improvementofcrassphagedetectionquantificationmethodanditsextensiveapplicationforfoodsafety