Cargando…

Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) results in significant loss of quality of life. Management guidelines do not recommend fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for IBS based on weak evidence as refined data is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohan, Babu P., Loganathan, Priyadarshini, Khan, Shahab R., Garg, Gauri, Muthusamy, Arunkumar, Ponnada, Suresh, Pasam, Ravi Teja, Chandan, Saurabh, Tuteja, Ashok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer India 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37247177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-023-01373-5
_version_ 1785050447922331648
author Mohan, Babu P.
Loganathan, Priyadarshini
Khan, Shahab R.
Garg, Gauri
Muthusamy, Arunkumar
Ponnada, Suresh
Pasam, Ravi Teja
Chandan, Saurabh
Tuteja, Ashok
author_facet Mohan, Babu P.
Loganathan, Priyadarshini
Khan, Shahab R.
Garg, Gauri
Muthusamy, Arunkumar
Ponnada, Suresh
Pasam, Ravi Teja
Chandan, Saurabh
Tuteja, Ashok
author_sort Mohan, Babu P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) results in significant loss of quality of life. Management guidelines do not recommend fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for IBS based on weak evidence as refined data is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the pooled clinical outcomes of FMT in IBS, delivered via invasive routes. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched through January 2023 to identify studies that reported on FMT treatment in IBS by invasive routes. Standard meta-analysis methodology using the random-effects model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed by I(2)% and 95% predication interval. RESULTS: Five studies were included. As many as 377 IBS patients were assessed, of which 238 received FMT and 139 received placebo. One study used nasojejunal tubes, one esophagogastroduodenoscopy and three colonoscopy for FMT delivery. FMT via colonoscopy was performed as a one-time procedure instilled into the cecum. Two studies used 30 g of stool from a single universal donor and one study used 50–80 g of pooled donor feces. The pooled odds ratio of improvement in IBS symptoms with FMT was significantly better as compared to that of placebo OR = 2.9 (95% CI [1.6–5.2, I(2) = 62%, p < 0.001]). This was true for studies that exclusively used colonoscopy (OR = 2.1 [1.1–4.2, p = 0.04]). In the FMT arm, 10 patients (10.6%) reported abdomen pain and worsening of symptoms with bloating and six patients (6.3%) reported diarrhea. CONCLUSION: FMT delivered via invasive routes, especially colonoscopy, demonstrated significant improvement in IBS symptoms. A single FMT consisting of 30 g or more of single universal donor feces instilled into the cecum is the predominant modality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12664-023-01373-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10225764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer India
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102257642023-05-30 Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Mohan, Babu P. Loganathan, Priyadarshini Khan, Shahab R. Garg, Gauri Muthusamy, Arunkumar Ponnada, Suresh Pasam, Ravi Teja Chandan, Saurabh Tuteja, Ashok Indian J Gastroenterol Systematic Review BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) results in significant loss of quality of life. Management guidelines do not recommend fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for IBS based on weak evidence as refined data is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the pooled clinical outcomes of FMT in IBS, delivered via invasive routes. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched through January 2023 to identify studies that reported on FMT treatment in IBS by invasive routes. Standard meta-analysis methodology using the random-effects model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed by I(2)% and 95% predication interval. RESULTS: Five studies were included. As many as 377 IBS patients were assessed, of which 238 received FMT and 139 received placebo. One study used nasojejunal tubes, one esophagogastroduodenoscopy and three colonoscopy for FMT delivery. FMT via colonoscopy was performed as a one-time procedure instilled into the cecum. Two studies used 30 g of stool from a single universal donor and one study used 50–80 g of pooled donor feces. The pooled odds ratio of improvement in IBS symptoms with FMT was significantly better as compared to that of placebo OR = 2.9 (95% CI [1.6–5.2, I(2) = 62%, p < 0.001]). This was true for studies that exclusively used colonoscopy (OR = 2.1 [1.1–4.2, p = 0.04]). In the FMT arm, 10 patients (10.6%) reported abdomen pain and worsening of symptoms with bloating and six patients (6.3%) reported diarrhea. CONCLUSION: FMT delivered via invasive routes, especially colonoscopy, demonstrated significant improvement in IBS symptoms. A single FMT consisting of 30 g or more of single universal donor feces instilled into the cecum is the predominant modality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12664-023-01373-5. Springer India 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10225764/ /pubmed/37247177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-023-01373-5 Text en © Indian Society of Gastroenterology 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Mohan, Babu P.
Loganathan, Priyadarshini
Khan, Shahab R.
Garg, Gauri
Muthusamy, Arunkumar
Ponnada, Suresh
Pasam, Ravi Teja
Chandan, Saurabh
Tuteja, Ashok
Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37247177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12664-023-01373-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mohanbabup fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT loganathanpriyadarshini fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT khanshahabr fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT garggauri fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT muthusamyarunkumar fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ponnadasuresh fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT pasamraviteja fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chandansaurabh fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT tutejaashok fecalmicrobiotatransplantdeliveredviainvasiveroutesinirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials