Cargando…
Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A single-center experience
BACKGROUND: Rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are one of the rare clinical presentations in colorectal surgical practice, with an increasing incidence over the recent years. Due to the lack of standardized treatment options, the management of RFBs can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate our diag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kare Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36880626 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.62543 |
_version_ | 1785050459262681088 |
---|---|
author | Bisgin, Tayfun Sogucak, Seçkin Manoğlu, Berke Derici, Zekai Serhan Atila, Koray Sokmen, Selman |
author_facet | Bisgin, Tayfun Sogucak, Seçkin Manoğlu, Berke Derici, Zekai Serhan Atila, Koray Sokmen, Selman |
author_sort | Bisgin, Tayfun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are one of the rare clinical presentations in colorectal surgical practice, with an increasing incidence over the recent years. Due to the lack of standardized treatment options, the management of RFBs can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate our diagnostic and therapeutic approach to RFBs and to suggest a management algorithm. METHODS: All patients with RFBs who hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, RFB insertion mechanism, inserted objects, diagnostic findings, management, complications, and outcomes were all evaluated. An algorithm for clinical management was developed depending on the center’s experience. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 21 patients, 17 (81%) were males. The median age was 33 years (ranging, 19–71). Sexual preferences were the reason for RFB in 15 (71.4%) patients. In 17 (81%) patients, the RFB size over 10 cm. In 4 (19%) patients, RFBs were removed transanally without anesthesia in the emergency department; in the remaining 17 (81%), they were removed under anesthesia. Among these, RFBs were removed transanally under general anesthesia in 2 (9.5%) patients; with the assistance of a colonoscope under anesthesia in 8 (38%) patients; by milking towards the transanal route during laparotomy in 3 (14.2%) patients; and with the Hartmann procedure without restoration of bowel continuity in 4 (19%) patients. The median hospital stay was 6 days (ranging, 1–34 days). The Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complication rate was 9.5%, and no post-operative mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: RFBs can usually be successfully removed transanally in the operating room with appropriate anesthetic technique and proper surgical instrument selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10225831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Kare Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102258312023-06-02 Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A single-center experience Bisgin, Tayfun Sogucak, Seçkin Manoğlu, Berke Derici, Zekai Serhan Atila, Koray Sokmen, Selman Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg Original Article BACKGROUND: Rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are one of the rare clinical presentations in colorectal surgical practice, with an increasing incidence over the recent years. Due to the lack of standardized treatment options, the management of RFBs can be challenging. This study aimed to evaluate our diagnostic and therapeutic approach to RFBs and to suggest a management algorithm. METHODS: All patients with RFBs who hospitalized between January 2010 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, RFB insertion mechanism, inserted objects, diagnostic findings, management, complications, and outcomes were all evaluated. An algorithm for clinical management was developed depending on the center’s experience. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 21 patients, 17 (81%) were males. The median age was 33 years (ranging, 19–71). Sexual preferences were the reason for RFB in 15 (71.4%) patients. In 17 (81%) patients, the RFB size over 10 cm. In 4 (19%) patients, RFBs were removed transanally without anesthesia in the emergency department; in the remaining 17 (81%), they were removed under anesthesia. Among these, RFBs were removed transanally under general anesthesia in 2 (9.5%) patients; with the assistance of a colonoscope under anesthesia in 8 (38%) patients; by milking towards the transanal route during laparotomy in 3 (14.2%) patients; and with the Hartmann procedure without restoration of bowel continuity in 4 (19%) patients. The median hospital stay was 6 days (ranging, 1–34 days). The Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV complication rate was 9.5%, and no post-operative mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: RFBs can usually be successfully removed transanally in the operating room with appropriate anesthetic technique and proper surgical instrument selection. Kare Publishing 2023-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10225831/ /pubmed/36880626 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.62543 Text en Copyright © 2023 Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License |
spellingShingle | Original Article Bisgin, Tayfun Sogucak, Seçkin Manoğlu, Berke Derici, Zekai Serhan Atila, Koray Sokmen, Selman Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A single-center experience |
title | Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A single-center experience |
title_full | Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A single-center experience |
title_fullStr | Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A single-center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A single-center experience |
title_short | Surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: A single-center experience |
title_sort | surgical management of rectal foreign bodies: a single-center experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10225831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36880626 http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2022.62543 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bisgintayfun surgicalmanagementofrectalforeignbodiesasinglecenterexperience AT sogucakseckin surgicalmanagementofrectalforeignbodiesasinglecenterexperience AT manogluberke surgicalmanagementofrectalforeignbodiesasinglecenterexperience AT dericizekaiserhan surgicalmanagementofrectalforeignbodiesasinglecenterexperience AT atilakoray surgicalmanagementofrectalforeignbodiesasinglecenterexperience AT sokmenselman surgicalmanagementofrectalforeignbodiesasinglecenterexperience |