Cargando…
A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol
BACKGROUND: The superiority of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) with regard to weight gain and improvement of psychopathology of eating disorders for patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) over other psychotherapies and treatment as usual (TAU) has not been demonstrated in randomized control...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37248498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-023-00277-2 |
_version_ | 1785050527620399104 |
---|---|
author | Nohara, Nobuhiro Yamanaka, Yukari Matsuoka, Mikiko Yamazaki, Tadahiro Kawai, Keisuke Takakura, Shu Sudo, Nobuyuki Ando, Tetsuya Matsuyama, Yutaka Byrne, Susan Dalle Grave, Riccardo Cooper, Zafra Yoshiuchi, Kazuhiro |
author_facet | Nohara, Nobuhiro Yamanaka, Yukari Matsuoka, Mikiko Yamazaki, Tadahiro Kawai, Keisuke Takakura, Shu Sudo, Nobuyuki Ando, Tetsuya Matsuyama, Yutaka Byrne, Susan Dalle Grave, Riccardo Cooper, Zafra Yoshiuchi, Kazuhiro |
author_sort | Nohara, Nobuhiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The superiority of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) with regard to weight gain and improvement of psychopathology of eating disorders for patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) over other psychotherapies and treatment as usual (TAU) has not been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, a previous RCT showed that patients with AN whose baseline body mass index (BMI) was less than 17.5 kg/m(2) gained more weight when treated with CBT-E than with other psychotherapies. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of CBT-E and TAU for patients with AN. It was hypothesized that CBT-E would be superior to TAU, at least in terms of weight gain, as most patients with AN are likely to have a BMI lower than 17.5 kg/m(2). METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized parallel-group multicenter trial will be conducted in three teaching hospitals in Japan between January 2023 and March 2026. Patients with DSM-5 AN, aged 16 years and older, with a BMI equal to or above 14.0 and below 18.5 will be eligible to participate. 56 patients will be randomly and evenly assigned to two intervention groups (CBT-E and TAU). Those assigned to CBT-E will be offered 25–40 sessions in accordance with their initial BMI. Patients assigned to TAU will have at least one session every 2 weeks, with the number of sessions and treatment period not fixed in advance. The primary outcome is BMI at 40 weeks after treatment initiation. The secondary outcomes are the results from the Japanese version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Clinical Impairment Assessment questionnaire to measure eating disorder psychopathology and psychological impairment. The follow-up assessment will be performed 6 months after the 40-week assessment. DISCUSSION: This multi-center randomized controlled study will probably evaluate the efficacy of CBT-E compared with TAU for patients with more severe AN than in previous studies since Japanese patients are likely to have a lower BMI than those in Western countries. While it may be difficult to generalize the results of a study conducted in Japan, it would be valuable to clarify the efficacy of CBT-E as a treatment package. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN, UMIN000048847. Registered 12 Sep 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13030-023-00277-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10226199 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102261992023-05-30 A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol Nohara, Nobuhiro Yamanaka, Yukari Matsuoka, Mikiko Yamazaki, Tadahiro Kawai, Keisuke Takakura, Shu Sudo, Nobuyuki Ando, Tetsuya Matsuyama, Yutaka Byrne, Susan Dalle Grave, Riccardo Cooper, Zafra Yoshiuchi, Kazuhiro Biopsychosoc Med Research BACKGROUND: The superiority of Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT-E) with regard to weight gain and improvement of psychopathology of eating disorders for patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) over other psychotherapies and treatment as usual (TAU) has not been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, a previous RCT showed that patients with AN whose baseline body mass index (BMI) was less than 17.5 kg/m(2) gained more weight when treated with CBT-E than with other psychotherapies. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of CBT-E and TAU for patients with AN. It was hypothesized that CBT-E would be superior to TAU, at least in terms of weight gain, as most patients with AN are likely to have a BMI lower than 17.5 kg/m(2). METHODS/DESIGN: A randomized parallel-group multicenter trial will be conducted in three teaching hospitals in Japan between January 2023 and March 2026. Patients with DSM-5 AN, aged 16 years and older, with a BMI equal to or above 14.0 and below 18.5 will be eligible to participate. 56 patients will be randomly and evenly assigned to two intervention groups (CBT-E and TAU). Those assigned to CBT-E will be offered 25–40 sessions in accordance with their initial BMI. Patients assigned to TAU will have at least one session every 2 weeks, with the number of sessions and treatment period not fixed in advance. The primary outcome is BMI at 40 weeks after treatment initiation. The secondary outcomes are the results from the Japanese version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire and Clinical Impairment Assessment questionnaire to measure eating disorder psychopathology and psychological impairment. The follow-up assessment will be performed 6 months after the 40-week assessment. DISCUSSION: This multi-center randomized controlled study will probably evaluate the efficacy of CBT-E compared with TAU for patients with more severe AN than in previous studies since Japanese patients are likely to have a lower BMI than those in Western countries. While it may be difficult to generalize the results of a study conducted in Japan, it would be valuable to clarify the efficacy of CBT-E as a treatment package. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN, UMIN000048847. Registered 12 Sep 2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13030-023-00277-2. BioMed Central 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10226199/ /pubmed/37248498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-023-00277-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Nohara, Nobuhiro Yamanaka, Yukari Matsuoka, Mikiko Yamazaki, Tadahiro Kawai, Keisuke Takakura, Shu Sudo, Nobuyuki Ando, Tetsuya Matsuyama, Yutaka Byrne, Susan Dalle Grave, Riccardo Cooper, Zafra Yoshiuchi, Kazuhiro A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol |
title | A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol |
title_full | A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol |
title_fullStr | A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol |
title_short | A multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (CBT-E) with treatment as usual (TAU) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol |
title_sort | multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study to compare the efficacy of enhanced cognitive behavior therapy (cbt-e) with treatment as usual (tau) for anorexia nervosa: study protocol |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226199/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37248498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13030-023-00277-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT noharanobuhiro amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT yamanakayukari amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT matsuokamikiko amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT yamazakitadahiro amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT kawaikeisuke amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT takakurashu amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT sudonobuyuki amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT andotetsuya amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT matsuyamayutaka amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT byrnesusan amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT dallegravericcardo amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT cooperzafra amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT yoshiuchikazuhiro amulticenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT noharanobuhiro multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT yamanakayukari multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT matsuokamikiko multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT yamazakitadahiro multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT kawaikeisuke multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT takakurashu multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT sudonobuyuki multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT andotetsuya multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT matsuyamayutaka multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT byrnesusan multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT dallegravericcardo multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT cooperzafra multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol AT yoshiuchikazuhiro multicenterrandomizedparallelgroupstudytocomparetheefficacyofenhancedcognitivebehaviortherapycbtewithtreatmentasusualtauforanorexianervosastudyprotocol |