Cargando…

Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: To validate case definitions for eczema using primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). METHODS: This study used EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces, representing 689,301 p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stirton, Hannah, Kosowan, Leanne, Abrams, Elissa M, Protudjer, Jennifer LP, Queenan, John, Singer, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00785-4
_version_ 1785050530980036608
author Stirton, Hannah
Kosowan, Leanne
Abrams, Elissa M
Protudjer, Jennifer LP
Queenan, John
Singer, Alexander
author_facet Stirton, Hannah
Kosowan, Leanne
Abrams, Elissa M
Protudjer, Jennifer LP
Queenan, John
Singer, Alexander
author_sort Stirton, Hannah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To validate case definitions for eczema using primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). METHODS: This study used EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces, representing 689,301 patients. Using a subset of patient records seven medical students or family medicine residents created a reference set of 1,772 patients. A total of 23 clinician-informed case definitions were validated against the reference. We assessed agreement using sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy. The case definitions with the best agreement statistics were deployed to estimate the prevalence of eczema in the CPCSSN. RESULTS: Case definition 1 had the highest SE (92.1%,85.0-96.5) but a lower SP (88.5%,86.7–90.1) and PPV (36.6%,33.1–40.3). Case definition 7 was the most specific case definition with a SP (99.8%, 99.4–100) and PPV (84.2%,61.2–94.7) but low SE (15.8%,9.3–24.5). Case definition 17 had a SE (75.3%, 65.7–83.3), SP (93.8%, 91.5–94.3) and PPV 43.7% (38.3–49.2). When we applied the most specific and most sensitive case definitions, we estimate the prevalence of eczema to be between 0.8 and 15.1%. Case definition 17 suggests an eczema prevalence estimate of 8.2% (8.08–8.21%). CONCLUSIONS: We validated EMR-based eczema case definitions to estimate the prevalence of clinician-documented eczema. Future studies may choose to apply one or more of these definitions’ dependent on their studies objectives to inform disease surveillance as well as explore burden of illness or interventions related to eczema care in Canada.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10226215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102262152023-05-30 Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study Stirton, Hannah Kosowan, Leanne Abrams, Elissa M Protudjer, Jennifer LP Queenan, John Singer, Alexander Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Research BACKGROUND: To validate case definitions for eczema using primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). METHODS: This study used EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces, representing 689,301 patients. Using a subset of patient records seven medical students or family medicine residents created a reference set of 1,772 patients. A total of 23 clinician-informed case definitions were validated against the reference. We assessed agreement using sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy. The case definitions with the best agreement statistics were deployed to estimate the prevalence of eczema in the CPCSSN. RESULTS: Case definition 1 had the highest SE (92.1%,85.0-96.5) but a lower SP (88.5%,86.7–90.1) and PPV (36.6%,33.1–40.3). Case definition 7 was the most specific case definition with a SP (99.8%, 99.4–100) and PPV (84.2%,61.2–94.7) but low SE (15.8%,9.3–24.5). Case definition 17 had a SE (75.3%, 65.7–83.3), SP (93.8%, 91.5–94.3) and PPV 43.7% (38.3–49.2). When we applied the most specific and most sensitive case definitions, we estimate the prevalence of eczema to be between 0.8 and 15.1%. Case definition 17 suggests an eczema prevalence estimate of 8.2% (8.08–8.21%). CONCLUSIONS: We validated EMR-based eczema case definitions to estimate the prevalence of clinician-documented eczema. Future studies may choose to apply one or more of these definitions’ dependent on their studies objectives to inform disease surveillance as well as explore burden of illness or interventions related to eczema care in Canada. BioMed Central 2023-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10226215/ /pubmed/37246208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00785-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Stirton, Hannah
Kosowan, Leanne
Abrams, Elissa M
Protudjer, Jennifer LP
Queenan, John
Singer, Alexander
Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study
title Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study
title_full Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study
title_short Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study
title_sort validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00785-4
work_keys_str_mv AT stirtonhannah validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT kosowanleanne validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT abramselissam validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT protudjerjenniferlp validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT queenanjohn validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy
AT singeralexander validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy