Cargando…
Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study
BACKGROUND: To validate case definitions for eczema using primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). METHODS: This study used EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces, representing 689,301 p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00785-4 |
_version_ | 1785050530980036608 |
---|---|
author | Stirton, Hannah Kosowan, Leanne Abrams, Elissa M Protudjer, Jennifer LP Queenan, John Singer, Alexander |
author_facet | Stirton, Hannah Kosowan, Leanne Abrams, Elissa M Protudjer, Jennifer LP Queenan, John Singer, Alexander |
author_sort | Stirton, Hannah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To validate case definitions for eczema using primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). METHODS: This study used EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces, representing 689,301 patients. Using a subset of patient records seven medical students or family medicine residents created a reference set of 1,772 patients. A total of 23 clinician-informed case definitions were validated against the reference. We assessed agreement using sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy. The case definitions with the best agreement statistics were deployed to estimate the prevalence of eczema in the CPCSSN. RESULTS: Case definition 1 had the highest SE (92.1%,85.0-96.5) but a lower SP (88.5%,86.7–90.1) and PPV (36.6%,33.1–40.3). Case definition 7 was the most specific case definition with a SP (99.8%, 99.4–100) and PPV (84.2%,61.2–94.7) but low SE (15.8%,9.3–24.5). Case definition 17 had a SE (75.3%, 65.7–83.3), SP (93.8%, 91.5–94.3) and PPV 43.7% (38.3–49.2). When we applied the most specific and most sensitive case definitions, we estimate the prevalence of eczema to be between 0.8 and 15.1%. Case definition 17 suggests an eczema prevalence estimate of 8.2% (8.08–8.21%). CONCLUSIONS: We validated EMR-based eczema case definitions to estimate the prevalence of clinician-documented eczema. Future studies may choose to apply one or more of these definitions’ dependent on their studies objectives to inform disease surveillance as well as explore burden of illness or interventions related to eczema care in Canada. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10226215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102262152023-05-30 Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study Stirton, Hannah Kosowan, Leanne Abrams, Elissa M Protudjer, Jennifer LP Queenan, John Singer, Alexander Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol Research BACKGROUND: To validate case definitions for eczema using primary care Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). METHODS: This study used EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces, representing 689,301 patients. Using a subset of patient records seven medical students or family medicine residents created a reference set of 1,772 patients. A total of 23 clinician-informed case definitions were validated against the reference. We assessed agreement using sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and overall accuracy. The case definitions with the best agreement statistics were deployed to estimate the prevalence of eczema in the CPCSSN. RESULTS: Case definition 1 had the highest SE (92.1%,85.0-96.5) but a lower SP (88.5%,86.7–90.1) and PPV (36.6%,33.1–40.3). Case definition 7 was the most specific case definition with a SP (99.8%, 99.4–100) and PPV (84.2%,61.2–94.7) but low SE (15.8%,9.3–24.5). Case definition 17 had a SE (75.3%, 65.7–83.3), SP (93.8%, 91.5–94.3) and PPV 43.7% (38.3–49.2). When we applied the most specific and most sensitive case definitions, we estimate the prevalence of eczema to be between 0.8 and 15.1%. Case definition 17 suggests an eczema prevalence estimate of 8.2% (8.08–8.21%). CONCLUSIONS: We validated EMR-based eczema case definitions to estimate the prevalence of clinician-documented eczema. Future studies may choose to apply one or more of these definitions’ dependent on their studies objectives to inform disease surveillance as well as explore burden of illness or interventions related to eczema care in Canada. BioMed Central 2023-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10226215/ /pubmed/37246208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00785-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Stirton, Hannah Kosowan, Leanne Abrams, Elissa M Protudjer, Jennifer LP Queenan, John Singer, Alexander Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study |
title | Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_full | Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_short | Validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study |
title_sort | validation of a primary care electronic medical records case definition for eczema: retrospective cross-sectional study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00785-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stirtonhannah validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT kosowanleanne validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT abramselissam validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT protudjerjenniferlp validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT queenanjohn validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy AT singeralexander validationofaprimarycareelectronicmedicalrecordscasedefinitionforeczemaretrospectivecrosssectionalstudy |