Cargando…

Comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis

BACKGROUND: Topical immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus in different concentrations are a breakthrough in the management of recalcitrant vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC); however, there is a lacks of comparative studies to guide their use in VKC management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saha, Bhawesh Chandra, Kumari, Rashmi, Ambasta, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414231173532
_version_ 1785050546600673280
author Saha, Bhawesh Chandra
Kumari, Rashmi
Ambasta, Anita
author_facet Saha, Bhawesh Chandra
Kumari, Rashmi
Ambasta, Anita
author_sort Saha, Bhawesh Chandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Topical immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus in different concentrations are a breakthrough in the management of recalcitrant vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC); however, there is a lacks of comparative studies to guide their use in VKC management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus 0.03% and 0.1% eye ointment in the treatment of recalcitrant VKC. DESIGN: A retrospective comparative single-centre observational study. METHOD: We reviewed records of a total of 48 recalcitrant VKC patients treated with two different strengths of tacrolimus ointment between April 2016 and March 2017. Of these, 39 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were categorized into two groups, A and B, depending on the use of strength of tacrolimus (0.03% and 0.1%) used, respectively. Group A had 18 patients, while group B had 21 patients. Thirty-six patients, 18 from each group, were finally analysed and compared. Records of patients were explored for the subjective symptoms and objective sign score of the patient at baseline and at each time point. The main outcome measures were composite scoring and comparison of total subjective symptom scores (TSSSs) and total objective sign scores (TOSSs) within and between the groups at each follow-up. Percentage of patient with significant reduction in symptom and sign scores as compared with baseline was considered success of treatment. Chi-square and t-tests were used for comparison of outcomes between both groups RESULTS: Mixed variety was most commonly encountered type of VKC. The signs and symptoms were significantly reduced in patients with treatment in both groups (p = 0.001) in all types of VKC. However, in group B, there was significant improvement in the size of papillae (p = 0.04) as compared baseline in contrast to group A. Side effects like burning and stinging in group B were significantly higher as compared with group A. CONCLUSIONS: Both strengths of tacrolimus (0.03% and 0.1%) are effective in all forms of recalcitrant VKC. Papillary component of VKC responds better with higher strength (0.1%) but is associated with more significant side effects. Different strengths of tacrolimus can be used strategically depending upon the severity and clinical type of VKC to intensify outcome and minimize side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10226287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102262872023-05-30 Comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis Saha, Bhawesh Chandra Kumari, Rashmi Ambasta, Anita Ther Adv Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Topical immunosuppressants such as tacrolimus in different concentrations are a breakthrough in the management of recalcitrant vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC); however, there is a lacks of comparative studies to guide their use in VKC management. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus 0.03% and 0.1% eye ointment in the treatment of recalcitrant VKC. DESIGN: A retrospective comparative single-centre observational study. METHOD: We reviewed records of a total of 48 recalcitrant VKC patients treated with two different strengths of tacrolimus ointment between April 2016 and March 2017. Of these, 39 fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were categorized into two groups, A and B, depending on the use of strength of tacrolimus (0.03% and 0.1%) used, respectively. Group A had 18 patients, while group B had 21 patients. Thirty-six patients, 18 from each group, were finally analysed and compared. Records of patients were explored for the subjective symptoms and objective sign score of the patient at baseline and at each time point. The main outcome measures were composite scoring and comparison of total subjective symptom scores (TSSSs) and total objective sign scores (TOSSs) within and between the groups at each follow-up. Percentage of patient with significant reduction in symptom and sign scores as compared with baseline was considered success of treatment. Chi-square and t-tests were used for comparison of outcomes between both groups RESULTS: Mixed variety was most commonly encountered type of VKC. The signs and symptoms were significantly reduced in patients with treatment in both groups (p = 0.001) in all types of VKC. However, in group B, there was significant improvement in the size of papillae (p = 0.04) as compared baseline in contrast to group A. Side effects like burning and stinging in group B were significantly higher as compared with group A. CONCLUSIONS: Both strengths of tacrolimus (0.03% and 0.1%) are effective in all forms of recalcitrant VKC. Papillary component of VKC responds better with higher strength (0.1%) but is associated with more significant side effects. Different strengths of tacrolimus can be used strategically depending upon the severity and clinical type of VKC to intensify outcome and minimize side effects. SAGE Publications 2023-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10226287/ /pubmed/37255622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414231173532 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Saha, Bhawesh Chandra
Kumari, Rashmi
Ambasta, Anita
Comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
title Comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
title_full Comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
title_fullStr Comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
title_full_unstemmed Comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
title_short Comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
title_sort comparision of efficacy and safety of 0.03% and 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255622
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414231173532
work_keys_str_mv AT sahabhaweshchandra comparisionofefficacyandsafetyof003and01tacrolimusointmentinchildrenwithvernalkeratoconjunctivitis
AT kumarirashmi comparisionofefficacyandsafetyof003and01tacrolimusointmentinchildrenwithvernalkeratoconjunctivitis
AT ambastaanita comparisionofefficacyandsafetyof003and01tacrolimusointmentinchildrenwithvernalkeratoconjunctivitis