Cargando…

How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the incidence of offset stem usage in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), and to assess the necessity for their use with the femoral and tibial components. Methods: This retrospective radiological study included 862 patients who underwent rTKA between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasiliadis, Angelo V., Lording, Timothy, Canetti, Robin, Servien, Elvire, Lustig, Sébastien, Batailler, Cécile
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023012
_version_ 1785050577347018752
author Vasiliadis, Angelo V.
Lording, Timothy
Canetti, Robin
Servien, Elvire
Lustig, Sébastien
Batailler, Cécile
author_facet Vasiliadis, Angelo V.
Lording, Timothy
Canetti, Robin
Servien, Elvire
Lustig, Sébastien
Batailler, Cécile
author_sort Vasiliadis, Angelo V.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: This study aimed to determine the incidence of offset stem usage in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), and to assess the necessity for their use with the femoral and tibial components. Methods: This retrospective radiological study included 862 patients who underwent rTKA between 2010 and 2022. Patients were divided into a non-stem group (group NS), offset stem group (group OS), and straight stem group (group SS). Two senior orthopedic surgeons evaluated all the post-operative radiographs of the group OS to assess the necessity of offset use. Results: In total, 789 patients met all eligibility inclusion criteria and were reviewed (305 males (38.7%)) with a mean age of 72.7 ± 10.2 years old [39; 96]. Eighty-eight (11.1%) patients had undergone rTKA with offset stems (34 tibia, 31 femur, 24 both) and 609 (70.2%) with straight stems. The tibial and femoral stems were diaphyseal of over 75 mm in 83 revisions (94.3%) for group OS and 444 revisions (72.9%) for group SS (p < 0.001). Offset in the tibial component was located medially in 50% of rTKA, while the offset in the femoral component was placed anteriorly in 47.3% of the rTKA. Assessment by the two independent senior surgeons found stems were only necessary in 3.4% of cases. Offset stems were only required for the tibial implant. Discussion: Offset stems were used in 11.1% of revision total knee replacements, however, they were deemed necessary in 3.4% and for the tibial component only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10226448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102264482023-05-30 How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees Vasiliadis, Angelo V. Lording, Timothy Canetti, Robin Servien, Elvire Lustig, Sébastien Batailler, Cécile SICOT J Original Article Introduction: This study aimed to determine the incidence of offset stem usage in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), and to assess the necessity for their use with the femoral and tibial components. Methods: This retrospective radiological study included 862 patients who underwent rTKA between 2010 and 2022. Patients were divided into a non-stem group (group NS), offset stem group (group OS), and straight stem group (group SS). Two senior orthopedic surgeons evaluated all the post-operative radiographs of the group OS to assess the necessity of offset use. Results: In total, 789 patients met all eligibility inclusion criteria and were reviewed (305 males (38.7%)) with a mean age of 72.7 ± 10.2 years old [39; 96]. Eighty-eight (11.1%) patients had undergone rTKA with offset stems (34 tibia, 31 femur, 24 both) and 609 (70.2%) with straight stems. The tibial and femoral stems were diaphyseal of over 75 mm in 83 revisions (94.3%) for group OS and 444 revisions (72.9%) for group SS (p < 0.001). Offset in the tibial component was located medially in 50% of rTKA, while the offset in the femoral component was placed anteriorly in 47.3% of the rTKA. Assessment by the two independent senior surgeons found stems were only necessary in 3.4% of cases. Offset stems were only required for the tibial implant. Discussion: Offset stems were used in 11.1% of revision total knee replacements, however, they were deemed necessary in 3.4% and for the tibial component only. EDP Sciences 2023-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10226448/ /pubmed/37246944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023012 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vasiliadis, Angelo V.
Lording, Timothy
Canetti, Robin
Servien, Elvire
Lustig, Sébastien
Batailler, Cécile
How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees
title How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees
title_full How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees
title_fullStr How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees
title_full_unstemmed How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees
title_short How often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? About a consecutive series of 789 knees
title_sort how often do we need offset stems for revision total knee arthroplasty? about a consecutive series of 789 knees
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023012
work_keys_str_mv AT vasiliadisangelov howoftendoweneedoffsetstemsforrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyaboutaconsecutiveseriesof789knees
AT lordingtimothy howoftendoweneedoffsetstemsforrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyaboutaconsecutiveseriesof789knees
AT canettirobin howoftendoweneedoffsetstemsforrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyaboutaconsecutiveseriesof789knees
AT servienelvire howoftendoweneedoffsetstemsforrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyaboutaconsecutiveseriesof789knees
AT lustigsebastien howoftendoweneedoffsetstemsforrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyaboutaconsecutiveseriesof789knees
AT bataillercecile howoftendoweneedoffsetstemsforrevisiontotalkneearthroplastyaboutaconsecutiveseriesof789knees