Cargando…

Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?

Patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) often require extended periods of ventilation. We examined the role of tracheostomy on outcomes of patients supported with VV-ECMO. We reviewed all patients at our institution who received VV-ECMO between 2013 and 2019. Pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boudreaux, Joel C., Urban, Marian, Thompson, Shaun L., Castleberry, Anthony W., Moulton, Michael J., Siddique, Aleem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001934
_version_ 1785050581132378112
author Boudreaux, Joel C.
Urban, Marian
Thompson, Shaun L.
Castleberry, Anthony W.
Moulton, Michael J.
Siddique, Aleem
author_facet Boudreaux, Joel C.
Urban, Marian
Thompson, Shaun L.
Castleberry, Anthony W.
Moulton, Michael J.
Siddique, Aleem
author_sort Boudreaux, Joel C.
collection PubMed
description Patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) often require extended periods of ventilation. We examined the role of tracheostomy on outcomes of patients supported with VV-ECMO. We reviewed all patients at our institution who received VV-ECMO between 2013 and 2019. Patients who received a tracheostomy were compared with VV-ECMO–supported patients without tracheostomy. The primary outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and adverse events related to the tracheostomy procedure. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality. We dichotomized patients receiving tracheostomy into an “early” and “late” group based on median days to tracheostomy following ECMO cannulation and separate analysis was performed. One hundred and fifty patients met inclusion criteria, 32 received a tracheostomy. Survival to discharge was comparable between the groups (53.1% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.658). Predictors of mortality on multivariable analysis included Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) score (odds ratio [OR] = 0.831, p = .015) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (OR = 1.026, p = 0.011). Tracheostomy performance was not predictive of mortality (OR = 0.837, p = 0.658). Bleeding requiring intervention occurred in 18.7% of patients following tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy (<7 days from the initiation of VV-ECMO) was associated with shorter ICU (25 vs. 36 days, p = 0.04) and hospital (33 vs. 47, p = 0.017) length of stay compared with late tracheostomy. We conclude that tracheostomy can be performed safely in patients receiving VV-ECMO. Mortality in these patients is predicted by severity of the underlying disease. Performance of tracheostomy does not impact survival. Early tracheostomy may decrease length of stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10226464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102264642023-05-30 Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation? Boudreaux, Joel C. Urban, Marian Thompson, Shaun L. Castleberry, Anthony W. Moulton, Michael J. Siddique, Aleem ASAIO J Pulmonary Patients receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) often require extended periods of ventilation. We examined the role of tracheostomy on outcomes of patients supported with VV-ECMO. We reviewed all patients at our institution who received VV-ECMO between 2013 and 2019. Patients who received a tracheostomy were compared with VV-ECMO–supported patients without tracheostomy. The primary outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcome measures included length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and adverse events related to the tracheostomy procedure. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify predictors of in-hospital mortality. We dichotomized patients receiving tracheostomy into an “early” and “late” group based on median days to tracheostomy following ECMO cannulation and separate analysis was performed. One hundred and fifty patients met inclusion criteria, 32 received a tracheostomy. Survival to discharge was comparable between the groups (53.1% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.658). Predictors of mortality on multivariable analysis included Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) score (odds ratio [OR] = 0.831, p = .015) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (OR = 1.026, p = 0.011). Tracheostomy performance was not predictive of mortality (OR = 0.837, p = 0.658). Bleeding requiring intervention occurred in 18.7% of patients following tracheostomy. Early tracheostomy (<7 days from the initiation of VV-ECMO) was associated with shorter ICU (25 vs. 36 days, p = 0.04) and hospital (33 vs. 47, p = 0.017) length of stay compared with late tracheostomy. We conclude that tracheostomy can be performed safely in patients receiving VV-ECMO. Mortality in these patients is predicted by severity of the underlying disease. Performance of tracheostomy does not impact survival. Early tracheostomy may decrease length of stay. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-04-18 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10226464/ /pubmed/37071756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001934 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the ASAIO. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Pulmonary
Boudreaux, Joel C.
Urban, Marian
Thompson, Shaun L.
Castleberry, Anthony W.
Moulton, Michael J.
Siddique, Aleem
Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?
title Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?
title_full Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?
title_fullStr Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?
title_full_unstemmed Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?
title_short Does Tracheostomy Improve Outcomes in Those Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation?
title_sort does tracheostomy improve outcomes in those receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation?
topic Pulmonary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37071756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001934
work_keys_str_mv AT boudreauxjoelc doestracheostomyimproveoutcomesinthosereceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT urbanmarian doestracheostomyimproveoutcomesinthosereceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT thompsonshaunl doestracheostomyimproveoutcomesinthosereceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT castleberryanthonyw doestracheostomyimproveoutcomesinthosereceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT moultonmichaelj doestracheostomyimproveoutcomesinthosereceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenation
AT siddiquealeem doestracheostomyimproveoutcomesinthosereceivingvenovenousextracorporealmembraneoxygenation