Cargando…
While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study
INTRODUCTION: Student clinical placements are a mandatory requirement within most accredited health programs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many health settings that had traditionally provided placements cancelled their offerings. Telehealth services however, increased and emerged as an alternative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256090 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1151980 |
_version_ | 1785050620447686656 |
---|---|
author | Bacon, Rachel Hopkins, Sian Georgousopoulou, Ekavi Nahon, Irmina Hilly, Catherine Millar, CaraJane Flynn, Allyson Smillie, Linda Chapman, Sarah Brown, Nicholas |
author_facet | Bacon, Rachel Hopkins, Sian Georgousopoulou, Ekavi Nahon, Irmina Hilly, Catherine Millar, CaraJane Flynn, Allyson Smillie, Linda Chapman, Sarah Brown, Nicholas |
author_sort | Bacon, Rachel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Student clinical placements are a mandatory requirement within most accredited health programs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many health settings that had traditionally provided placements cancelled their offerings. Telehealth services however, increased and emerged as an alternative placement setting. AIM: To compare the learning experiences for allied health students provided by telehealth and face-to-face accredited health placements. METHODS: Health students, from a university clinic between March to December 2020, delivering both face-to-face and telehealth consultations, were invited to complete a telephone survey with 3 demographic questions; and 10-items comparing their telehealth and face-to-face learning experiences. Pearson’s chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test was used to examine the association between each item and consultation setting. Qualitative survey data was thematically analysed using a descriptive approach. RESULTS: 49 students from 2 universities and 5 disciplines completed the survey. Students rated their face-to-face experiences significantly higher than their telehealth experiences across all items (all p-values <0.01). Across 9 items students reported positive learning experiences in both settings. Students had greater opportunities to work in a multidisciplinary team in a face-to-face setting. Four themes were generated: (1) placements can vary in quality regardless of setting; (2) telehealth can provide valuable learning experiences and support competency development; (3) enablers for telehealth placements and (4) barriers for telehealth placements. CONCLUSION: While telehealth can support student learning and competency development, in this study students preferred face-to-face experiences. To optimise telehealth placements consideration needs to be given to barriers and enablers such as technological issues and university curricula preparation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10226666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102266662023-05-30 While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study Bacon, Rachel Hopkins, Sian Georgousopoulou, Ekavi Nahon, Irmina Hilly, Catherine Millar, CaraJane Flynn, Allyson Smillie, Linda Chapman, Sarah Brown, Nicholas Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Student clinical placements are a mandatory requirement within most accredited health programs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many health settings that had traditionally provided placements cancelled their offerings. Telehealth services however, increased and emerged as an alternative placement setting. AIM: To compare the learning experiences for allied health students provided by telehealth and face-to-face accredited health placements. METHODS: Health students, from a university clinic between March to December 2020, delivering both face-to-face and telehealth consultations, were invited to complete a telephone survey with 3 demographic questions; and 10-items comparing their telehealth and face-to-face learning experiences. Pearson’s chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test was used to examine the association between each item and consultation setting. Qualitative survey data was thematically analysed using a descriptive approach. RESULTS: 49 students from 2 universities and 5 disciplines completed the survey. Students rated their face-to-face experiences significantly higher than their telehealth experiences across all items (all p-values <0.01). Across 9 items students reported positive learning experiences in both settings. Students had greater opportunities to work in a multidisciplinary team in a face-to-face setting. Four themes were generated: (1) placements can vary in quality regardless of setting; (2) telehealth can provide valuable learning experiences and support competency development; (3) enablers for telehealth placements and (4) barriers for telehealth placements. CONCLUSION: While telehealth can support student learning and competency development, in this study students preferred face-to-face experiences. To optimise telehealth placements consideration needs to be given to barriers and enablers such as technological issues and university curricula preparation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10226666/ /pubmed/37256090 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1151980 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bacon, Hopkins, Georgousopoulou, Nahon, Hilly, Millar, Flynn, Smillie, Chapman and Brown. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Bacon, Rachel Hopkins, Sian Georgousopoulou, Ekavi Nahon, Irmina Hilly, Catherine Millar, CaraJane Flynn, Allyson Smillie, Linda Chapman, Sarah Brown, Nicholas While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study |
title | While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study |
title_full | While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study |
title_short | While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | while allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256090 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1151980 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baconrachel whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT hopkinssian whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT georgousopoulouekavi whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT nahonirmina whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT hillycatherine whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT millarcarajane whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT flynnallyson whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT smillielinda whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT chapmansarah whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy AT brownnicholas whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy |