Cargando…

While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study

INTRODUCTION: Student clinical placements are a mandatory requirement within most accredited health programs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many health settings that had traditionally provided placements cancelled their offerings. Telehealth services however, increased and emerged as an alternative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bacon, Rachel, Hopkins, Sian, Georgousopoulou, Ekavi, Nahon, Irmina, Hilly, Catherine, Millar, CaraJane, Flynn, Allyson, Smillie, Linda, Chapman, Sarah, Brown, Nicholas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256090
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1151980
_version_ 1785050620447686656
author Bacon, Rachel
Hopkins, Sian
Georgousopoulou, Ekavi
Nahon, Irmina
Hilly, Catherine
Millar, CaraJane
Flynn, Allyson
Smillie, Linda
Chapman, Sarah
Brown, Nicholas
author_facet Bacon, Rachel
Hopkins, Sian
Georgousopoulou, Ekavi
Nahon, Irmina
Hilly, Catherine
Millar, CaraJane
Flynn, Allyson
Smillie, Linda
Chapman, Sarah
Brown, Nicholas
author_sort Bacon, Rachel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Student clinical placements are a mandatory requirement within most accredited health programs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many health settings that had traditionally provided placements cancelled their offerings. Telehealth services however, increased and emerged as an alternative placement setting. AIM: To compare the learning experiences for allied health students provided by telehealth and face-to-face accredited health placements. METHODS: Health students, from a university clinic between March to December 2020, delivering both face-to-face and telehealth consultations, were invited to complete a telephone survey with 3 demographic questions; and 10-items comparing their telehealth and face-to-face learning experiences. Pearson’s chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test was used to examine the association between each item and consultation setting. Qualitative survey data was thematically analysed using a descriptive approach. RESULTS: 49 students from 2 universities and 5 disciplines completed the survey. Students rated their face-to-face experiences significantly higher than their telehealth experiences across all items (all p-values <0.01). Across 9 items students reported positive learning experiences in both settings. Students had greater opportunities to work in a multidisciplinary team in a face-to-face setting. Four themes were generated: (1) placements can vary in quality regardless of setting; (2) telehealth can provide valuable learning experiences and support competency development; (3) enablers for telehealth placements and (4) barriers for telehealth placements. CONCLUSION: While telehealth can support student learning and competency development, in this study students preferred face-to-face experiences. To optimise telehealth placements consideration needs to be given to barriers and enablers such as technological issues and university curricula preparation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10226666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102266662023-05-30 While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study Bacon, Rachel Hopkins, Sian Georgousopoulou, Ekavi Nahon, Irmina Hilly, Catherine Millar, CaraJane Flynn, Allyson Smillie, Linda Chapman, Sarah Brown, Nicholas Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine INTRODUCTION: Student clinical placements are a mandatory requirement within most accredited health programs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many health settings that had traditionally provided placements cancelled their offerings. Telehealth services however, increased and emerged as an alternative placement setting. AIM: To compare the learning experiences for allied health students provided by telehealth and face-to-face accredited health placements. METHODS: Health students, from a university clinic between March to December 2020, delivering both face-to-face and telehealth consultations, were invited to complete a telephone survey with 3 demographic questions; and 10-items comparing their telehealth and face-to-face learning experiences. Pearson’s chi-squared/Fisher’s exact test was used to examine the association between each item and consultation setting. Qualitative survey data was thematically analysed using a descriptive approach. RESULTS: 49 students from 2 universities and 5 disciplines completed the survey. Students rated their face-to-face experiences significantly higher than their telehealth experiences across all items (all p-values <0.01). Across 9 items students reported positive learning experiences in both settings. Students had greater opportunities to work in a multidisciplinary team in a face-to-face setting. Four themes were generated: (1) placements can vary in quality regardless of setting; (2) telehealth can provide valuable learning experiences and support competency development; (3) enablers for telehealth placements and (4) barriers for telehealth placements. CONCLUSION: While telehealth can support student learning and competency development, in this study students preferred face-to-face experiences. To optimise telehealth placements consideration needs to be given to barriers and enablers such as technological issues and university curricula preparation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10226666/ /pubmed/37256090 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1151980 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bacon, Hopkins, Georgousopoulou, Nahon, Hilly, Millar, Flynn, Smillie, Chapman and Brown. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Bacon, Rachel
Hopkins, Sian
Georgousopoulou, Ekavi
Nahon, Irmina
Hilly, Catherine
Millar, CaraJane
Flynn, Allyson
Smillie, Linda
Chapman, Sarah
Brown, Nicholas
While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study
title While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study
title_full While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study
title_short While allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study
title_sort while allied health students prefer face-to-face clinical placement, telehealth can support competency development: results from a mixed-methods study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256090
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1151980
work_keys_str_mv AT baconrachel whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT hopkinssian whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT georgousopoulouekavi whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT nahonirmina whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT hillycatherine whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT millarcarajane whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT flynnallyson whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT smillielinda whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT chapmansarah whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy
AT brownnicholas whilealliedhealthstudentspreferfacetofaceclinicalplacementtelehealthcansupportcompetencydevelopmentresultsfromamixedmethodsstudy