Cargando…

Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults

Background: Shock is one of the most common severe syndromes requiring emergency treatment. Acute myocardial infarction guidelines, the surviving sepsis campaign, and low blood volume resuscitation guidelines indicate the prioritization of early identification of shock. APACHE II (Acute Physiology a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: N, Rohith, Narayanaswamy, Srikanth, Hegde, Swati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261150
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38224
_version_ 1785050647189520384
author N, Rohith
Narayanaswamy, Srikanth
Hegde, Swati
author_facet N, Rohith
Narayanaswamy, Srikanth
Hegde, Swati
author_sort N, Rohith
collection PubMed
description Background: Shock is one of the most common severe syndromes requiring emergency treatment. Acute myocardial infarction guidelines, the surviving sepsis campaign, and low blood volume resuscitation guidelines indicate the prioritization of early identification of shock. APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II), SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), and MEWS (Modified Early Warning System) scores are used to predict mortality in ICU (intensive care unit) patients. However, similar to APACHE II, SOFA cannot be used for rapid assessment. Hence the need for a new scoring system that is simple, faster, and efficacious in predicting and preventing mortality among shock patients. The present study was conducted to evaluate a new MEWS scoring system for early identification and estimate mortality risk in patients with shock. Methods: A total of 170 patients with shock meeting the inclusion criteria who presented to the ICU of Ramaiah Hospitals from November 2019 to August 2021 were included in the study. Baseline variables, laboratory parameters, APACHE II score, SOFA score, MEWS score, and new MEWS score were compared between the two groups. Patients were followed up till mortality or discharge from ICU. Results: Among the 170 patients included in the study septic shock (69.4%) was the most common type of shock followed by cardiogenic (7.64%) and hypovolemic shock (7.64%). The requirement of inotropic support and mechanical ventilation was associated with significantly higher mortality (55.6% and 52.6% respectively). The AUROC (area under the curve) for SOFA in predicting mortality was 0.738 (p<0.001). The AUROC for APACHE II score in predicting mortality was 0.758 (p<0.001). The AUROC for MEWS score in predicting mortality was 0.655 (p=0.0002). The AUROC for the new MEWS score in predicting mortality was 0.684 which is more than that of the conventional MEWS score (p <0.001). Conclusion: New MEWS score is better than the MEWS score in predicting mortality. The new MEWS score is a simple, entirely clinical, inexpensive scoring system that can be done within a short time as a patient contact in an emergency. Hence, the new MEWS score can help in the quick identification of patients who are at high risk for developing shock and can be used as a better predictor of mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10226831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102268312023-05-31 Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults N, Rohith Narayanaswamy, Srikanth Hegde, Swati Cureus Internal Medicine Background: Shock is one of the most common severe syndromes requiring emergency treatment. Acute myocardial infarction guidelines, the surviving sepsis campaign, and low blood volume resuscitation guidelines indicate the prioritization of early identification of shock. APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II), SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), and MEWS (Modified Early Warning System) scores are used to predict mortality in ICU (intensive care unit) patients. However, similar to APACHE II, SOFA cannot be used for rapid assessment. Hence the need for a new scoring system that is simple, faster, and efficacious in predicting and preventing mortality among shock patients. The present study was conducted to evaluate a new MEWS scoring system for early identification and estimate mortality risk in patients with shock. Methods: A total of 170 patients with shock meeting the inclusion criteria who presented to the ICU of Ramaiah Hospitals from November 2019 to August 2021 were included in the study. Baseline variables, laboratory parameters, APACHE II score, SOFA score, MEWS score, and new MEWS score were compared between the two groups. Patients were followed up till mortality or discharge from ICU. Results: Among the 170 patients included in the study septic shock (69.4%) was the most common type of shock followed by cardiogenic (7.64%) and hypovolemic shock (7.64%). The requirement of inotropic support and mechanical ventilation was associated with significantly higher mortality (55.6% and 52.6% respectively). The AUROC (area under the curve) for SOFA in predicting mortality was 0.738 (p<0.001). The AUROC for APACHE II score in predicting mortality was 0.758 (p<0.001). The AUROC for MEWS score in predicting mortality was 0.655 (p=0.0002). The AUROC for the new MEWS score in predicting mortality was 0.684 which is more than that of the conventional MEWS score (p <0.001). Conclusion: New MEWS score is better than the MEWS score in predicting mortality. The new MEWS score is a simple, entirely clinical, inexpensive scoring system that can be done within a short time as a patient contact in an emergency. Hence, the new MEWS score can help in the quick identification of patients who are at high risk for developing shock and can be used as a better predictor of mortality. Cureus 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10226831/ /pubmed/37261150 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38224 Text en Copyright © 2023, N et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Internal Medicine
N, Rohith
Narayanaswamy, Srikanth
Hegde, Swati
Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults
title Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults
title_full Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults
title_fullStr Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults
title_short Clinical Study of a New Modified Early Warning Scoring System for Rapidly Evaluating Shock in Adults
title_sort clinical study of a new modified early warning scoring system for rapidly evaluating shock in adults
topic Internal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261150
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.38224
work_keys_str_mv AT nrohith clinicalstudyofanewmodifiedearlywarningscoringsystemforrapidlyevaluatingshockinadults
AT narayanaswamysrikanth clinicalstudyofanewmodifiedearlywarningscoringsystemforrapidlyevaluatingshockinadults
AT hegdeswati clinicalstudyofanewmodifiedearlywarningscoringsystemforrapidlyevaluatingshockinadults