Cargando…

The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass

Anesthesia management of patients with mediastinal mass compressing the central airway is considered challenging. It is widely believed that general anesthesia induction in patients with mediastinal mass is associated with airway collapse, difficulty in ventilation and hemodynamic compromise. Additi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarkiss, Mona, Jimenez, Carlos A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261097
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-22-37
_version_ 1785050661676646400
author Sarkiss, Mona
Jimenez, Carlos A.
author_facet Sarkiss, Mona
Jimenez, Carlos A.
author_sort Sarkiss, Mona
collection PubMed
description Anesthesia management of patients with mediastinal mass compressing the central airway is considered challenging. It is widely believed that general anesthesia induction in patients with mediastinal mass is associated with airway collapse, difficulty in ventilation and hemodynamic compromise. Additionally, several case reports and case series described patients demise after induction of general anesthesia. This has led to the strong recommendations to use inhalation induction, avoid the use of muscle relaxant and maintenance of spontaneous ventilation. Recent studies shed new light on our understanding of airway changes associated with mediastinal mass by directly visualizing and measuring the actual changes of the airway caliber and the variation in the peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) in patients with mediastinal mass. These studies describe the changes in airway mechanics in different states e.g., awake and anesthetized, spontaneous and positive pressure ventilated with or without muscle relaxation. Interesting new findings in these recent publications show that general anesthesia with and without muscle relaxation does not worsen a pre-existing narrowing of the airway compressed by mediastinal mass. Moreover, it was discovered that the addition of positive pressure ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and muscle relaxation in an anesthetized patient were associated with improvement in the airway caliber and airflow in these patient’s population. This new understanding of the mechanics of airway obstruction and the effects of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation on patients with mediastinal mass challenges our current anesthesia practices and leads us to consider a new approach to anesthetize and ventilate these patients. This article will review the past literature that led to the widely practiced current anesthesia techniques and how it is challenged with the new research. The author will also provide a new perspective and anesthesia technique that align with the new research findings for safe induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in patients with mediastinal mass.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10226893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102268932023-05-31 The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass Sarkiss, Mona Jimenez, Carlos A. Mediastinum Review Article Anesthesia management of patients with mediastinal mass compressing the central airway is considered challenging. It is widely believed that general anesthesia induction in patients with mediastinal mass is associated with airway collapse, difficulty in ventilation and hemodynamic compromise. Additionally, several case reports and case series described patients demise after induction of general anesthesia. This has led to the strong recommendations to use inhalation induction, avoid the use of muscle relaxant and maintenance of spontaneous ventilation. Recent studies shed new light on our understanding of airway changes associated with mediastinal mass by directly visualizing and measuring the actual changes of the airway caliber and the variation in the peak inspiratory flow (PIF) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) in patients with mediastinal mass. These studies describe the changes in airway mechanics in different states e.g., awake and anesthetized, spontaneous and positive pressure ventilated with or without muscle relaxation. Interesting new findings in these recent publications show that general anesthesia with and without muscle relaxation does not worsen a pre-existing narrowing of the airway compressed by mediastinal mass. Moreover, it was discovered that the addition of positive pressure ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and muscle relaxation in an anesthetized patient were associated with improvement in the airway caliber and airflow in these patient’s population. This new understanding of the mechanics of airway obstruction and the effects of anesthesia and mechanical ventilation on patients with mediastinal mass challenges our current anesthesia practices and leads us to consider a new approach to anesthetize and ventilate these patients. This article will review the past literature that led to the widely practiced current anesthesia techniques and how it is challenged with the new research. The author will also provide a new perspective and anesthesia technique that align with the new research findings for safe induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in patients with mediastinal mass. AME Publishing Company 2023-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10226893/ /pubmed/37261097 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-22-37 Text en 2023 Mediastinum. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Sarkiss, Mona
Jimenez, Carlos A.
The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass
title The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass
title_full The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass
title_fullStr The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass
title_full_unstemmed The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass
title_short The evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass
title_sort evolution of anesthesia management of patients with anterior mediastinal mass
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10226893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261097
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/med-22-37
work_keys_str_mv AT sarkissmona theevolutionofanesthesiamanagementofpatientswithanteriormediastinalmass
AT jimenezcarlosa theevolutionofanesthesiamanagementofpatientswithanteriormediastinalmass
AT sarkissmona evolutionofanesthesiamanagementofpatientswithanteriormediastinalmass
AT jimenezcarlosa evolutionofanesthesiamanagementofpatientswithanteriormediastinalmass