Cargando…
Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan
Evidence clearinghouses evaluate and summarize literature to help decision-makers prioritize and invest in evidence-informed interventions. Clearinghouses and related practice-oriented tools are continuously evolving; however, it is unclear the extent to which these tools assess and summarize eviden...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7 |
_version_ | 1785050698038116352 |
---|---|
author | Hirsch, Bomi Kim Stevenson, Michael C. Givens, Marjory L. |
author_facet | Hirsch, Bomi Kim Stevenson, Michael C. Givens, Marjory L. |
author_sort | Hirsch, Bomi Kim |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evidence clearinghouses evaluate and summarize literature to help decision-makers prioritize and invest in evidence-informed interventions. Clearinghouses and related practice-oriented tools are continuously evolving; however, it is unclear the extent to which these tools assess and summarize evidence describing an intervention’s impact on health equity. We conducted a systematic scan to explore how clearinghouses communicated an intervention’s equity impact and reviewed their underlying methods and how they defined and operationalized health equity. In 2021, we identified 18 clearinghouses that were US-focused, web-based registries of interventions that assigned an intervention effectiveness rating for improving community health and the social determinants of health. We reviewed each clearinghouse’s website and collected publicly available information about their health equity impact review, review methods, and health equity definitions and values. We conducted a comparative analysis among select clearinghouses using qualitative methods. Among the 18 clearinghouses, fewer than half (only seven) summarized an intervention’s potential impact on health equity. Overall, those seven clearinghouses defined and operationalized equity differently, and most lacked transparency in their review methods. Clearinghouses used one or more approaches to communicate findings from their review: summarize study findings on differential impact for subpopulations, curate interventions that reduce health disparities, and/or assign a disparity/equity rating to each intervention. Evidence clearinghouses can enhance equity-focused methods and be transparent in their underlying values to better support the uptake and implementation of evidence-informed interventions to advance health equity. However, clearinghouses are unable to do so without underlying equity-focused empirical evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10227106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102271062023-05-31 Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan Hirsch, Bomi Kim Stevenson, Michael C. Givens, Marjory L. Prev Sci Article Evidence clearinghouses evaluate and summarize literature to help decision-makers prioritize and invest in evidence-informed interventions. Clearinghouses and related practice-oriented tools are continuously evolving; however, it is unclear the extent to which these tools assess and summarize evidence describing an intervention’s impact on health equity. We conducted a systematic scan to explore how clearinghouses communicated an intervention’s equity impact and reviewed their underlying methods and how they defined and operationalized health equity. In 2021, we identified 18 clearinghouses that were US-focused, web-based registries of interventions that assigned an intervention effectiveness rating for improving community health and the social determinants of health. We reviewed each clearinghouse’s website and collected publicly available information about their health equity impact review, review methods, and health equity definitions and values. We conducted a comparative analysis among select clearinghouses using qualitative methods. Among the 18 clearinghouses, fewer than half (only seven) summarized an intervention’s potential impact on health equity. Overall, those seven clearinghouses defined and operationalized equity differently, and most lacked transparency in their review methods. Clearinghouses used one or more approaches to communicate findings from their review: summarize study findings on differential impact for subpopulations, curate interventions that reduce health disparities, and/or assign a disparity/equity rating to each intervention. Evidence clearinghouses can enhance equity-focused methods and be transparent in their underlying values to better support the uptake and implementation of evidence-informed interventions to advance health equity. However, clearinghouses are unable to do so without underlying equity-focused empirical evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7. Springer US 2023-03-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10227106/ /pubmed/36856737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Hirsch, Bomi Kim Stevenson, Michael C. Givens, Marjory L. Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan |
title | Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan |
title_full | Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan |
title_fullStr | Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan |
title_short | Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan |
title_sort | evidence clearinghouses as tools to advance health equity: what we know from a systematic scan |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirschbomikim evidenceclearinghousesastoolstoadvancehealthequitywhatweknowfromasystematicscan AT stevensonmichaelc evidenceclearinghousesastoolstoadvancehealthequitywhatweknowfromasystematicscan AT givensmarjoryl evidenceclearinghousesastoolstoadvancehealthequitywhatweknowfromasystematicscan |