Cargando…

Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan

Evidence clearinghouses evaluate and summarize literature to help decision-makers prioritize and invest in evidence-informed interventions. Clearinghouses and related practice-oriented tools are continuously evolving; however, it is unclear the extent to which these tools assess and summarize eviden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirsch, Bomi Kim, Stevenson, Michael C., Givens, Marjory L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7
_version_ 1785050698038116352
author Hirsch, Bomi Kim
Stevenson, Michael C.
Givens, Marjory L.
author_facet Hirsch, Bomi Kim
Stevenson, Michael C.
Givens, Marjory L.
author_sort Hirsch, Bomi Kim
collection PubMed
description Evidence clearinghouses evaluate and summarize literature to help decision-makers prioritize and invest in evidence-informed interventions. Clearinghouses and related practice-oriented tools are continuously evolving; however, it is unclear the extent to which these tools assess and summarize evidence describing an intervention’s impact on health equity. We conducted a systematic scan to explore how clearinghouses communicated an intervention’s equity impact and reviewed their underlying methods and how they defined and operationalized health equity. In 2021, we identified 18 clearinghouses that were US-focused, web-based registries of interventions that assigned an intervention effectiveness rating for improving community health and the social determinants of health. We reviewed each clearinghouse’s website and collected publicly available information about their health equity impact review, review methods, and health equity definitions and values. We conducted a comparative analysis among select clearinghouses using qualitative methods. Among the 18 clearinghouses, fewer than half (only seven) summarized an intervention’s potential impact on health equity. Overall, those seven clearinghouses defined and operationalized equity differently, and most lacked transparency in their review methods. Clearinghouses used one or more approaches to communicate findings from their review: summarize study findings on differential impact for subpopulations, curate interventions that reduce health disparities, and/or assign a disparity/equity rating to each intervention. Evidence clearinghouses can enhance equity-focused methods and be transparent in their underlying values to better support the uptake and implementation of evidence-informed interventions to advance health equity. However, clearinghouses are unable to do so without underlying equity-focused empirical evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10227106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102271062023-05-31 Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan Hirsch, Bomi Kim Stevenson, Michael C. Givens, Marjory L. Prev Sci Article Evidence clearinghouses evaluate and summarize literature to help decision-makers prioritize and invest in evidence-informed interventions. Clearinghouses and related practice-oriented tools are continuously evolving; however, it is unclear the extent to which these tools assess and summarize evidence describing an intervention’s impact on health equity. We conducted a systematic scan to explore how clearinghouses communicated an intervention’s equity impact and reviewed their underlying methods and how they defined and operationalized health equity. In 2021, we identified 18 clearinghouses that were US-focused, web-based registries of interventions that assigned an intervention effectiveness rating for improving community health and the social determinants of health. We reviewed each clearinghouse’s website and collected publicly available information about their health equity impact review, review methods, and health equity definitions and values. We conducted a comparative analysis among select clearinghouses using qualitative methods. Among the 18 clearinghouses, fewer than half (only seven) summarized an intervention’s potential impact on health equity. Overall, those seven clearinghouses defined and operationalized equity differently, and most lacked transparency in their review methods. Clearinghouses used one or more approaches to communicate findings from their review: summarize study findings on differential impact for subpopulations, curate interventions that reduce health disparities, and/or assign a disparity/equity rating to each intervention. Evidence clearinghouses can enhance equity-focused methods and be transparent in their underlying values to better support the uptake and implementation of evidence-informed interventions to advance health equity. However, clearinghouses are unable to do so without underlying equity-focused empirical evidence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7. Springer US 2023-03-01 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10227106/ /pubmed/36856737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hirsch, Bomi Kim
Stevenson, Michael C.
Givens, Marjory L.
Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan
title Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan
title_full Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan
title_fullStr Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan
title_full_unstemmed Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan
title_short Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan
title_sort evidence clearinghouses as tools to advance health equity: what we know from a systematic scan
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36856737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01511-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hirschbomikim evidenceclearinghousesastoolstoadvancehealthequitywhatweknowfromasystematicscan
AT stevensonmichaelc evidenceclearinghousesastoolstoadvancehealthequitywhatweknowfromasystematicscan
AT givensmarjoryl evidenceclearinghousesastoolstoadvancehealthequitywhatweknowfromasystematicscan