Cargando…
Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review
OBJECTIVES: In this systematic review we aimed at assessing how artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) techniques have been deployed to predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease (CKD). We systematically reviewed the available evidence on these innovative techniques t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01573-4 |
_version_ | 1785050705062526976 |
---|---|
author | Sanmarchi, Francesco Fanconi, Claudio Golinelli, Davide Gori, Davide Hernandez-Boussard, Tina Capodici, Angelo |
author_facet | Sanmarchi, Francesco Fanconi, Claudio Golinelli, Davide Gori, Davide Hernandez-Boussard, Tina Capodici, Angelo |
author_sort | Sanmarchi, Francesco |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: In this systematic review we aimed at assessing how artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) techniques have been deployed to predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease (CKD). We systematically reviewed the available evidence on these innovative techniques to improve CKD diagnosis and patient management. METHODS: We included English language studies retrieved from PubMed. The review is therefore to be classified as a “rapid review”, since it includes one database only, and has language restrictions; the novelty and importance of the issue make missing relevant papers unlikely. We extracted 16 variables, including: main aim, studied population, data source, sample size, problem type (regression, classification), predictors used, and performance metrics. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) approach; all main steps were done in duplicate. RESULTS: From a total of 648 studies initially retrieved, 68 articles met the inclusion criteria. Models, as reported by authors, performed well, but the reported metrics were not homogeneous across articles and therefore direct comparison was not feasible. The most common aim was prediction of prognosis, followed by diagnosis of CKD. Algorithm generalizability, and testing on diverse populations was rarely taken into account. Furthermore, the clinical evaluation and validation of the models/algorithms was perused; only a fraction of the included studies, 6 out of 68, were performed in a clinical context. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning is a promising tool for the prediction of risk, diagnosis, and therapy management for CKD patients. Nonetheless, future work is needed to address the interpretability, generalizability, and fairness of the models to ensure the safe application of such technologies in routine clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40620-023-01573-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10227138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102271382023-05-31 Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review Sanmarchi, Francesco Fanconi, Claudio Golinelli, Davide Gori, Davide Hernandez-Boussard, Tina Capodici, Angelo J Nephrol Systematic Reviews OBJECTIVES: In this systematic review we aimed at assessing how artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) techniques have been deployed to predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease (CKD). We systematically reviewed the available evidence on these innovative techniques to improve CKD diagnosis and patient management. METHODS: We included English language studies retrieved from PubMed. The review is therefore to be classified as a “rapid review”, since it includes one database only, and has language restrictions; the novelty and importance of the issue make missing relevant papers unlikely. We extracted 16 variables, including: main aim, studied population, data source, sample size, problem type (regression, classification), predictors used, and performance metrics. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) approach; all main steps were done in duplicate. RESULTS: From a total of 648 studies initially retrieved, 68 articles met the inclusion criteria. Models, as reported by authors, performed well, but the reported metrics were not homogeneous across articles and therefore direct comparison was not feasible. The most common aim was prediction of prognosis, followed by diagnosis of CKD. Algorithm generalizability, and testing on diverse populations was rarely taken into account. Furthermore, the clinical evaluation and validation of the models/algorithms was perused; only a fraction of the included studies, 6 out of 68, were performed in a clinical context. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning is a promising tool for the prediction of risk, diagnosis, and therapy management for CKD patients. Nonetheless, future work is needed to address the interpretability, generalizability, and fairness of the models to ensure the safe application of such technologies in routine clinical practice. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40620-023-01573-4. Springer International Publishing 2023-02-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10227138/ /pubmed/36786976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01573-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Sanmarchi, Francesco Fanconi, Claudio Golinelli, Davide Gori, Davide Hernandez-Boussard, Tina Capodici, Angelo Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review |
title | Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review |
title_full | Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review |
title_short | Predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review |
title_sort | predict, diagnose, and treat chronic kidney disease with machine learning: a systematic literature review |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36786976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40620-023-01573-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sanmarchifrancesco predictdiagnoseandtreatchronickidneydiseasewithmachinelearningasystematicliteraturereview AT fanconiclaudio predictdiagnoseandtreatchronickidneydiseasewithmachinelearningasystematicliteraturereview AT golinellidavide predictdiagnoseandtreatchronickidneydiseasewithmachinelearningasystematicliteraturereview AT goridavide predictdiagnoseandtreatchronickidneydiseasewithmachinelearningasystematicliteraturereview AT hernandezboussardtina predictdiagnoseandtreatchronickidneydiseasewithmachinelearningasystematicliteraturereview AT capodiciangelo predictdiagnoseandtreatchronickidneydiseasewithmachinelearningasystematicliteraturereview |