Cargando…

Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3

PURPOSE: Proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) has been demonstrated to improve neurocognitive sequelae particularly. Nevertheless, following PRT, increased rates of radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) are feared. How safe and effective is PRT for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3? METHODS: W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eichkorn, Tanja, Lischalk, Jonathan W., Hörner-Rieber, Juliane, Deng, Maximilian, Meixner, Eva, Krämer, Anna, Hoegen, Philipp, Sandrini, Elisabetta, Regnery, Sebastian, Held, Thomas, Harrabi, Semi, Jungk, Christine, Herfarth, Klaus, Debus, Jürgen, König, Laila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04217-y
_version_ 1785050711007952896
author Eichkorn, Tanja
Lischalk, Jonathan W.
Hörner-Rieber, Juliane
Deng, Maximilian
Meixner, Eva
Krämer, Anna
Hoegen, Philipp
Sandrini, Elisabetta
Regnery, Sebastian
Held, Thomas
Harrabi, Semi
Jungk, Christine
Herfarth, Klaus
Debus, Jürgen
König, Laila
author_facet Eichkorn, Tanja
Lischalk, Jonathan W.
Hörner-Rieber, Juliane
Deng, Maximilian
Meixner, Eva
Krämer, Anna
Hoegen, Philipp
Sandrini, Elisabetta
Regnery, Sebastian
Held, Thomas
Harrabi, Semi
Jungk, Christine
Herfarth, Klaus
Debus, Jürgen
König, Laila
author_sort Eichkorn, Tanja
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) has been demonstrated to improve neurocognitive sequelae particularly. Nevertheless, following PRT, increased rates of radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) are feared. How safe and effective is PRT for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3? METHODS: We analyzed 194 patients diagnosed with IDH-mutated WHO grade 2 (n = 128) and WHO grade 3 (n = 66) glioma who were treated with PRT from 2010 to 2020. Serial clinical and imaging follow-up was performed for a median of 5.1 years. RESULTS: For WHO grade 2, 61% were astrocytoma and 39% oligodendroglioma while for WHO grade 3, 55% were astrocytoma and 45% oligodendroglioma. Median dose for IDH-mutated glioma was 54 Gy(RBE) [range 50.4–60 Gy(RBE)] for WHO grade 2 and 60 Gy(RBE) [range 54–60 Gy(RBE)] for WHO grade 3. Five year overall survival was 85% in patients with WHO grade 2 and 67% in patients with WHO grade 3 tumors. Overall RICE risk was 25%, being higher in patients with WHO grade 2 (29%) versus in patients with WHO grade 3 (17%, p = 0.13). RICE risk increased independent of tumor characteristics with older age (p = 0.017). Overall RICE was symptomatic in 31% of patients with corresponding CTCAE grades as follows: 80% grade 1, 7% grade 2, 13% grade 3, and 0% grade 3 + . Overall need for RICE-directed therapy was 35%. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the effectiveness of PRT for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3. The RICE risk differs with WHO grading and is higher in older patients with IDH-mutated Glioma WHO grade 2 and 3. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04217-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10227167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102271672023-05-31 Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3 Eichkorn, Tanja Lischalk, Jonathan W. Hörner-Rieber, Juliane Deng, Maximilian Meixner, Eva Krämer, Anna Hoegen, Philipp Sandrini, Elisabetta Regnery, Sebastian Held, Thomas Harrabi, Semi Jungk, Christine Herfarth, Klaus Debus, Jürgen König, Laila J Neurooncol Case Study PURPOSE: Proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) has been demonstrated to improve neurocognitive sequelae particularly. Nevertheless, following PRT, increased rates of radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) are feared. How safe and effective is PRT for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3? METHODS: We analyzed 194 patients diagnosed with IDH-mutated WHO grade 2 (n = 128) and WHO grade 3 (n = 66) glioma who were treated with PRT from 2010 to 2020. Serial clinical and imaging follow-up was performed for a median of 5.1 years. RESULTS: For WHO grade 2, 61% were astrocytoma and 39% oligodendroglioma while for WHO grade 3, 55% were astrocytoma and 45% oligodendroglioma. Median dose for IDH-mutated glioma was 54 Gy(RBE) [range 50.4–60 Gy(RBE)] for WHO grade 2 and 60 Gy(RBE) [range 54–60 Gy(RBE)] for WHO grade 3. Five year overall survival was 85% in patients with WHO grade 2 and 67% in patients with WHO grade 3 tumors. Overall RICE risk was 25%, being higher in patients with WHO grade 2 (29%) versus in patients with WHO grade 3 (17%, p = 0.13). RICE risk increased independent of tumor characteristics with older age (p = 0.017). Overall RICE was symptomatic in 31% of patients with corresponding CTCAE grades as follows: 80% grade 1, 7% grade 2, 13% grade 3, and 0% grade 3 + . Overall need for RICE-directed therapy was 35%. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the effectiveness of PRT for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3. The RICE risk differs with WHO grading and is higher in older patients with IDH-mutated Glioma WHO grade 2 and 3. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11060-022-04217-y. Springer US 2023-01-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10227167/ /pubmed/36598613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04217-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Case Study
Eichkorn, Tanja
Lischalk, Jonathan W.
Hörner-Rieber, Juliane
Deng, Maximilian
Meixner, Eva
Krämer, Anna
Hoegen, Philipp
Sandrini, Elisabetta
Regnery, Sebastian
Held, Thomas
Harrabi, Semi
Jungk, Christine
Herfarth, Klaus
Debus, Jürgen
König, Laila
Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3
title Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3
title_full Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3
title_fullStr Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3
title_short Analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for IDH-mutated glioma WHO grade 2 and 3
title_sort analysis of safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy for idh-mutated glioma who grade 2 and 3
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36598613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-022-04217-y
work_keys_str_mv AT eichkorntanja analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT lischalkjonathanw analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT hornerrieberjuliane analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT dengmaximilian analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT meixnereva analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT krameranna analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT hoegenphilipp analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT sandrinielisabetta analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT regnerysebastian analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT heldthomas analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT harrabisemi analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT jungkchristine analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT herfarthklaus analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT debusjurgen analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3
AT koniglaila analysisofsafetyandefficacyofprotonradiotherapyforidhmutatedgliomawhograde2and3