Cargando…

Matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence

Many studies emphasize the need of verbally representing pictorial metaphors, but few have empirically investigated whether and how the particular verbalization form match different types of pictorial metaphors. Using evoked response potentials (ERP), a 3 (pictorial structure: fusion, juxtaposition,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cao, Shuo, Yue, Fang, Zheng, Shihui, Fu, Yang, Huang, Jing, Wang, Huili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260959
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131387
_version_ 1785050789221236736
author Cao, Shuo
Yue, Fang
Zheng, Shihui
Fu, Yang
Huang, Jing
Wang, Huili
author_facet Cao, Shuo
Yue, Fang
Zheng, Shihui
Fu, Yang
Huang, Jing
Wang, Huili
author_sort Cao, Shuo
collection PubMed
description Many studies emphasize the need of verbally representing pictorial metaphors, but few have empirically investigated whether and how the particular verbalization form match different types of pictorial metaphors. Using evoked response potentials (ERP), a 3 (pictorial structure: fusion, juxtaposition, literal image) × 2 [verbalization form: A是(is) B, A像(is like) B] within-group experiment was conducted among 36 participants. ERPs were time-locked to the onset of the verb [是/像(is/is like)] of the metaphor sentence that follows a pictorial metaphor to detect the verbo-pictorial incongruity in metaphor comprehension. The incongruity-based ERP analysis showed that pictorial metaphors, when verbalized in two forms, all induced frontal N1 effect, regardless of pictorial structures, only with a larger N1 amplitude for literal images in “A是(is) B.” A central stronger P2 was observed in “A像(is like) B” for three structures. Despite a general elicitation of posterior P3 in all conditions, a larger P3 was found for juxtapositions verbalized in “A像(is like) B” and for literal images verbalized in “A是(is) B.” There was no significant difference between two verbalization forms for fusion-structured pictorial metaphors. These findings suggest: (1) verbo-pictorial metaphors could induce incongruity-based attention; (2) higher verbo-pictorial semantic congruity and relatedness, indexed by stronger P2 and P3, confirmed “A像(is like) B” to be the more effective verbalization form in representing pictorial metaphors, specifically for juxtaposition-structured pictorial metaphors; (3) for non-metaphor advertising pictures, verbal metaphor showed an interference effect. The study not only reveals the neuro-cognitive mechanism of processing verbo-pictorial metaphors, but also offers neural reference for the design of effective multi-modal metaphor by finding an optimal match between PMs and verbalization forms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10227512
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102275122023-05-31 Matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence Cao, Shuo Yue, Fang Zheng, Shihui Fu, Yang Huang, Jing Wang, Huili Front Psychol Psychology Many studies emphasize the need of verbally representing pictorial metaphors, but few have empirically investigated whether and how the particular verbalization form match different types of pictorial metaphors. Using evoked response potentials (ERP), a 3 (pictorial structure: fusion, juxtaposition, literal image) × 2 [verbalization form: A是(is) B, A像(is like) B] within-group experiment was conducted among 36 participants. ERPs were time-locked to the onset of the verb [是/像(is/is like)] of the metaphor sentence that follows a pictorial metaphor to detect the verbo-pictorial incongruity in metaphor comprehension. The incongruity-based ERP analysis showed that pictorial metaphors, when verbalized in two forms, all induced frontal N1 effect, regardless of pictorial structures, only with a larger N1 amplitude for literal images in “A是(is) B.” A central stronger P2 was observed in “A像(is like) B” for three structures. Despite a general elicitation of posterior P3 in all conditions, a larger P3 was found for juxtapositions verbalized in “A像(is like) B” and for literal images verbalized in “A是(is) B.” There was no significant difference between two verbalization forms for fusion-structured pictorial metaphors. These findings suggest: (1) verbo-pictorial metaphors could induce incongruity-based attention; (2) higher verbo-pictorial semantic congruity and relatedness, indexed by stronger P2 and P3, confirmed “A像(is like) B” to be the more effective verbalization form in representing pictorial metaphors, specifically for juxtaposition-structured pictorial metaphors; (3) for non-metaphor advertising pictures, verbal metaphor showed an interference effect. The study not only reveals the neuro-cognitive mechanism of processing verbo-pictorial metaphors, but also offers neural reference for the design of effective multi-modal metaphor by finding an optimal match between PMs and verbalization forms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10227512/ /pubmed/37260959 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131387 Text en Copyright © 2023 Cao, Yue, Zheng, Fu, Huang and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Cao, Shuo
Yue, Fang
Zheng, Shihui
Fu, Yang
Huang, Jing
Wang, Huili
Matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence
title Matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence
title_full Matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence
title_fullStr Matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence
title_full_unstemmed Matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence
title_short Matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence
title_sort matching different-structured advertising pictorial metaphors with verbalization forms: incongruity-based evoked response potentials evidence
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227512/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260959
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1131387
work_keys_str_mv AT caoshuo matchingdifferentstructuredadvertisingpictorialmetaphorswithverbalizationformsincongruitybasedevokedresponsepotentialsevidence
AT yuefang matchingdifferentstructuredadvertisingpictorialmetaphorswithverbalizationformsincongruitybasedevokedresponsepotentialsevidence
AT zhengshihui matchingdifferentstructuredadvertisingpictorialmetaphorswithverbalizationformsincongruitybasedevokedresponsepotentialsevidence
AT fuyang matchingdifferentstructuredadvertisingpictorialmetaphorswithverbalizationformsincongruitybasedevokedresponsepotentialsevidence
AT huangjing matchingdifferentstructuredadvertisingpictorialmetaphorswithverbalizationformsincongruitybasedevokedresponsepotentialsevidence
AT wanghuili matchingdifferentstructuredadvertisingpictorialmetaphorswithverbalizationformsincongruitybasedevokedresponsepotentialsevidence