Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography

BACKGROUND: The transfemoral (TF) arterial approach is still the most commonly used approach for performing diagnostic coronary angiography in most centers in the world as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Recently, the transradial (TR) arterial approach has gained more and more supporters among in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahic, Alan, Mujanovic, Emir, Bajric, Mugdim, Mirsic, Denis, Hasukic, Ismar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260800
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2023.77.112-117
_version_ 1785050855824687104
author Jahic, Alan
Mujanovic, Emir
Bajric, Mugdim
Mirsic, Denis
Hasukic, Ismar
author_facet Jahic, Alan
Mujanovic, Emir
Bajric, Mugdim
Mirsic, Denis
Hasukic, Ismar
author_sort Jahic, Alan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The transfemoral (TF) arterial approach is still the most commonly used approach for performing diagnostic coronary angiography in most centers in the world as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Recently, the transradial (TR) arterial approach has gained more and more supporters among interventional cardiologists. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the duration of the procedure, the amount of delivered ionizing radiation, the amount of applied contrast agent, the frequency of procedural complications and patient comfort during coronary angiography performed via TR and TF arterial approach. METHODS: The total sample of 240 respondents was divided into two groups in such a way that the first group consisted of 121 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TR arterial approach, and the second group consisted of 119 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TF arterial approach. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to verify the research objective. RESULTS: The obtained research results showed that the duration of coronary angiography and the amount of radiation was greater when using TR arterial approach compared to TF approach. There is no statistically significant difference in relation to the amount of applied contrast medium and the frequency of complications between the two approaches. Periprocedural and postprocedural comfort was better in patents who underwent TR approach. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TR arterial approach is as safe for the patient as diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TF arterial approach. With both approaches, there is no significant difference in the amount of contrast agent used nor in the frequency of complications. Procedure duration and radiation exposure are shorter when TF arterial approach i used, while patient comfort is better when the TR arterial approach is used.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10227836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102278362023-05-31 Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography Jahic, Alan Mujanovic, Emir Bajric, Mugdim Mirsic, Denis Hasukic, Ismar Med Arch Original Paper BACKGROUND: The transfemoral (TF) arterial approach is still the most commonly used approach for performing diagnostic coronary angiography in most centers in the world as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Recently, the transradial (TR) arterial approach has gained more and more supporters among interventional cardiologists. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the duration of the procedure, the amount of delivered ionizing radiation, the amount of applied contrast agent, the frequency of procedural complications and patient comfort during coronary angiography performed via TR and TF arterial approach. METHODS: The total sample of 240 respondents was divided into two groups in such a way that the first group consisted of 121 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TR arterial approach, and the second group consisted of 119 respondents who underwent coronary angiography using TF arterial approach. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to verify the research objective. RESULTS: The obtained research results showed that the duration of coronary angiography and the amount of radiation was greater when using TR arterial approach compared to TF approach. There is no statistically significant difference in relation to the amount of applied contrast medium and the frequency of complications between the two approaches. Periprocedural and postprocedural comfort was better in patents who underwent TR approach. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TR arterial approach is as safe for the patient as diagnostic coronary angiography performed via the TF arterial approach. With both approaches, there is no significant difference in the amount of contrast agent used nor in the frequency of complications. Procedure duration and radiation exposure are shorter when TF arterial approach i used, while patient comfort is better when the TR arterial approach is used. Academy of Medical Sciences of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2023-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10227836/ /pubmed/37260800 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2023.77.112-117 Text en © 2023 Alan Jahic, Emir Mujanovic, Mugdim Bajric, Denis Mirsic, Ismar Hasukic https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jahic, Alan
Mujanovic, Emir
Bajric, Mugdim
Mirsic, Denis
Hasukic, Ismar
Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_full Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_short Comparative Analysis of Transradial and Transfemoral Arterial Approach When Performing Diagnostic Coronary Angiography
title_sort comparative analysis of transradial and transfemoral arterial approach when performing diagnostic coronary angiography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260800
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2023.77.112-117
work_keys_str_mv AT jahicalan comparativeanalysisoftransradialandtransfemoralarterialapproachwhenperformingdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT mujanovicemir comparativeanalysisoftransradialandtransfemoralarterialapproachwhenperformingdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT bajricmugdim comparativeanalysisoftransradialandtransfemoralarterialapproachwhenperformingdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT mirsicdenis comparativeanalysisoftransradialandtransfemoralarterialapproachwhenperformingdiagnosticcoronaryangiography
AT hasukicismar comparativeanalysisoftransradialandtransfemoralarterialapproachwhenperformingdiagnosticcoronaryangiography