Cargando…

Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims

Claims management is critical to ensure the safe and high-quality medical care for which liability insurers and/or hospitals are responsible. The aim of this research is to determine whether increasing hospital malpractice risk exposure, with increasing deductibles, has an impact on malpractice clai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vetrugno, Giuseppe, Grassi, Simone, Foti, Federica, Siodambro, Chiara, Grassi, Vincenzo M., Conte, Celeste, Ghisellini, Renato, De-Giorgio, Fabio, Ausania, Francesco, Cittadini, Francesca, Rossi, Riccardo, Morte, Gabriele Della, Caputo, Matteo, Pascali, Vincenzo L., Ozonoff, Al, Oliva, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001125
_version_ 1785050869134262272
author Vetrugno, Giuseppe
Grassi, Simone
Foti, Federica
Siodambro, Chiara
Grassi, Vincenzo M.
Conte, Celeste
Ghisellini, Renato
De-Giorgio, Fabio
Ausania, Francesco
Cittadini, Francesca
Rossi, Riccardo
Morte, Gabriele Della
Caputo, Matteo
Pascali, Vincenzo L.
Ozonoff, Al
Oliva, Antonio
author_facet Vetrugno, Giuseppe
Grassi, Simone
Foti, Federica
Siodambro, Chiara
Grassi, Vincenzo M.
Conte, Celeste
Ghisellini, Renato
De-Giorgio, Fabio
Ausania, Francesco
Cittadini, Francesca
Rossi, Riccardo
Morte, Gabriele Della
Caputo, Matteo
Pascali, Vincenzo L.
Ozonoff, Al
Oliva, Antonio
author_sort Vetrugno, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Claims management is critical to ensure the safe and high-quality medical care for which liability insurers and/or hospitals are responsible. The aim of this research is to determine whether increasing hospital malpractice risk exposure, with increasing deductibles, has an impact on malpractice claims and payouts. METHODS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital, the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Payouts on closed reported and registered claims were analyzed during 4-study periods, which ranged from 1.5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the insurance company to 5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the hospital. We retrospectively analyzed 2034 medical malpractice claims submitted between January 1, 2007, and August 31, 2021. Four periods were examined depending on the claims management model adopted, ranging from total outsourcing to the insurer (period A) to an almost total hospital assumption of risk method (period D). RESULTS: We found that progressive hospital assumption of risk is associated with a decrease in the incidence of medical malpractice claims (average variation per year: −3.7%; P = 0.0029 if the 2 initial periods and the 2 last periods—characterized by the highest risk retention—are respectively aggregated and compared), an initial decrease in the mean claims cost followed by an increase that is still lower than the national increase (−5.4% on average), and an increase in the total claims cost (when compared with the period where the insurer solely managed claims). We also found that the rate of increase in payouts was less than the national average. CONCLUSIONS: The assumption of more malpractice risk by the hospital was associated with the adoption of numerous patient safety and risk management initiatives. The decrease in claims incidence could be due to the implementation of patient safety policies, while the cost increase could be attributed to inflation and rising costs of healthcare services and claims. Notably, only the hospital assumption of risk model with a high-deductible insurance coverage is sustainable for the studied hospital, while also being profitable for the insurer. In conclusion, as hospitals progressively assumed more risk and management responsibility of malpractice claims, there was a progressive decrease in the total number of claims, and a less rapid rise in claim payouts as compared with the national average. Even a small assumption of risk appeared to elicit meaningful changes in claim filings and payouts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10227933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102279332023-05-31 Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims Vetrugno, Giuseppe Grassi, Simone Foti, Federica Siodambro, Chiara Grassi, Vincenzo M. Conte, Celeste Ghisellini, Renato De-Giorgio, Fabio Ausania, Francesco Cittadini, Francesca Rossi, Riccardo Morte, Gabriele Della Caputo, Matteo Pascali, Vincenzo L. Ozonoff, Al Oliva, Antonio J Patient Saf Original Studies Claims management is critical to ensure the safe and high-quality medical care for which liability insurers and/or hospitals are responsible. The aim of this research is to determine whether increasing hospital malpractice risk exposure, with increasing deductibles, has an impact on malpractice claims and payouts. METHODS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital, the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Payouts on closed reported and registered claims were analyzed during 4-study periods, which ranged from 1.5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the insurance company to 5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the hospital. We retrospectively analyzed 2034 medical malpractice claims submitted between January 1, 2007, and August 31, 2021. Four periods were examined depending on the claims management model adopted, ranging from total outsourcing to the insurer (period A) to an almost total hospital assumption of risk method (period D). RESULTS: We found that progressive hospital assumption of risk is associated with a decrease in the incidence of medical malpractice claims (average variation per year: −3.7%; P = 0.0029 if the 2 initial periods and the 2 last periods—characterized by the highest risk retention—are respectively aggregated and compared), an initial decrease in the mean claims cost followed by an increase that is still lower than the national increase (−5.4% on average), and an increase in the total claims cost (when compared with the period where the insurer solely managed claims). We also found that the rate of increase in payouts was less than the national average. CONCLUSIONS: The assumption of more malpractice risk by the hospital was associated with the adoption of numerous patient safety and risk management initiatives. The decrease in claims incidence could be due to the implementation of patient safety policies, while the cost increase could be attributed to inflation and rising costs of healthcare services and claims. Notably, only the hospital assumption of risk model with a high-deductible insurance coverage is sustainable for the studied hospital, while also being profitable for the insurer. In conclusion, as hospitals progressively assumed more risk and management responsibility of malpractice claims, there was a progressive decrease in the total number of claims, and a less rapid rise in claim payouts as compared with the national average. Even a small assumption of risk appeared to elicit meaningful changes in claim filings and payouts. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10227933/ /pubmed/37074022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001125 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Studies
Vetrugno, Giuseppe
Grassi, Simone
Foti, Federica
Siodambro, Chiara
Grassi, Vincenzo M.
Conte, Celeste
Ghisellini, Renato
De-Giorgio, Fabio
Ausania, Francesco
Cittadini, Francesca
Rossi, Riccardo
Morte, Gabriele Della
Caputo, Matteo
Pascali, Vincenzo L.
Ozonoff, Al
Oliva, Antonio
Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims
title Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims
title_full Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims
title_fullStr Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims
title_short Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims
title_sort comparative impact analysis of low-deductible insurance versus in-house hospital assumption of risk and management on medical malpractice claims
topic Original Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074022
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001125
work_keys_str_mv AT vetrugnogiuseppe comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT grassisimone comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT fotifederica comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT siodambrochiara comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT grassivincenzom comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT conteceleste comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT ghisellinirenato comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT degiorgiofabio comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT ausaniafrancesco comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT cittadinifrancesca comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT rossiriccardo comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT mortegabrieledella comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT caputomatteo comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT pascalivincenzol comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT ozonoffal comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims
AT olivaantonio comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims