Cargando…
Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims
Claims management is critical to ensure the safe and high-quality medical care for which liability insurers and/or hospitals are responsible. The aim of this research is to determine whether increasing hospital malpractice risk exposure, with increasing deductibles, has an impact on malpractice clai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001125 |
_version_ | 1785050869134262272 |
---|---|
author | Vetrugno, Giuseppe Grassi, Simone Foti, Federica Siodambro, Chiara Grassi, Vincenzo M. Conte, Celeste Ghisellini, Renato De-Giorgio, Fabio Ausania, Francesco Cittadini, Francesca Rossi, Riccardo Morte, Gabriele Della Caputo, Matteo Pascali, Vincenzo L. Ozonoff, Al Oliva, Antonio |
author_facet | Vetrugno, Giuseppe Grassi, Simone Foti, Federica Siodambro, Chiara Grassi, Vincenzo M. Conte, Celeste Ghisellini, Renato De-Giorgio, Fabio Ausania, Francesco Cittadini, Francesca Rossi, Riccardo Morte, Gabriele Della Caputo, Matteo Pascali, Vincenzo L. Ozonoff, Al Oliva, Antonio |
author_sort | Vetrugno, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Claims management is critical to ensure the safe and high-quality medical care for which liability insurers and/or hospitals are responsible. The aim of this research is to determine whether increasing hospital malpractice risk exposure, with increasing deductibles, has an impact on malpractice claims and payouts. METHODS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital, the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Payouts on closed reported and registered claims were analyzed during 4-study periods, which ranged from 1.5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the insurance company to 5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the hospital. We retrospectively analyzed 2034 medical malpractice claims submitted between January 1, 2007, and August 31, 2021. Four periods were examined depending on the claims management model adopted, ranging from total outsourcing to the insurer (period A) to an almost total hospital assumption of risk method (period D). RESULTS: We found that progressive hospital assumption of risk is associated with a decrease in the incidence of medical malpractice claims (average variation per year: −3.7%; P = 0.0029 if the 2 initial periods and the 2 last periods—characterized by the highest risk retention—are respectively aggregated and compared), an initial decrease in the mean claims cost followed by an increase that is still lower than the national increase (−5.4% on average), and an increase in the total claims cost (when compared with the period where the insurer solely managed claims). We also found that the rate of increase in payouts was less than the national average. CONCLUSIONS: The assumption of more malpractice risk by the hospital was associated with the adoption of numerous patient safety and risk management initiatives. The decrease in claims incidence could be due to the implementation of patient safety policies, while the cost increase could be attributed to inflation and rising costs of healthcare services and claims. Notably, only the hospital assumption of risk model with a high-deductible insurance coverage is sustainable for the studied hospital, while also being profitable for the insurer. In conclusion, as hospitals progressively assumed more risk and management responsibility of malpractice claims, there was a progressive decrease in the total number of claims, and a less rapid rise in claim payouts as compared with the national average. Even a small assumption of risk appeared to elicit meaningful changes in claim filings and payouts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10227933 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102279332023-05-31 Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims Vetrugno, Giuseppe Grassi, Simone Foti, Federica Siodambro, Chiara Grassi, Vincenzo M. Conte, Celeste Ghisellini, Renato De-Giorgio, Fabio Ausania, Francesco Cittadini, Francesca Rossi, Riccardo Morte, Gabriele Della Caputo, Matteo Pascali, Vincenzo L. Ozonoff, Al Oliva, Antonio J Patient Saf Original Studies Claims management is critical to ensure the safe and high-quality medical care for which liability insurers and/or hospitals are responsible. The aim of this research is to determine whether increasing hospital malpractice risk exposure, with increasing deductibles, has an impact on malpractice claims and payouts. METHODS: The study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital, the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Payouts on closed reported and registered claims were analyzed during 4-study periods, which ranged from 1.5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the insurance company to 5 million euro annual aggregate deductibles entirely managed by the hospital. We retrospectively analyzed 2034 medical malpractice claims submitted between January 1, 2007, and August 31, 2021. Four periods were examined depending on the claims management model adopted, ranging from total outsourcing to the insurer (period A) to an almost total hospital assumption of risk method (period D). RESULTS: We found that progressive hospital assumption of risk is associated with a decrease in the incidence of medical malpractice claims (average variation per year: −3.7%; P = 0.0029 if the 2 initial periods and the 2 last periods—characterized by the highest risk retention—are respectively aggregated and compared), an initial decrease in the mean claims cost followed by an increase that is still lower than the national increase (−5.4% on average), and an increase in the total claims cost (when compared with the period where the insurer solely managed claims). We also found that the rate of increase in payouts was less than the national average. CONCLUSIONS: The assumption of more malpractice risk by the hospital was associated with the adoption of numerous patient safety and risk management initiatives. The decrease in claims incidence could be due to the implementation of patient safety policies, while the cost increase could be attributed to inflation and rising costs of healthcare services and claims. Notably, only the hospital assumption of risk model with a high-deductible insurance coverage is sustainable for the studied hospital, while also being profitable for the insurer. In conclusion, as hospitals progressively assumed more risk and management responsibility of malpractice claims, there was a progressive decrease in the total number of claims, and a less rapid rise in claim payouts as compared with the national average. Even a small assumption of risk appeared to elicit meaningful changes in claim filings and payouts. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10227933/ /pubmed/37074022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001125 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Studies Vetrugno, Giuseppe Grassi, Simone Foti, Federica Siodambro, Chiara Grassi, Vincenzo M. Conte, Celeste Ghisellini, Renato De-Giorgio, Fabio Ausania, Francesco Cittadini, Francesca Rossi, Riccardo Morte, Gabriele Della Caputo, Matteo Pascali, Vincenzo L. Ozonoff, Al Oliva, Antonio Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims |
title | Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims |
title_full | Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims |
title_fullStr | Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims |
title_short | Comparative Impact Analysis of Low-Deductible Insurance Versus In-house Hospital Assumption of Risk and Management on Medical Malpractice Claims |
title_sort | comparative impact analysis of low-deductible insurance versus in-house hospital assumption of risk and management on medical malpractice claims |
topic | Original Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227933/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37074022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001125 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vetrugnogiuseppe comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT grassisimone comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT fotifederica comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT siodambrochiara comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT grassivincenzom comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT conteceleste comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT ghisellinirenato comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT degiorgiofabio comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT ausaniafrancesco comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT cittadinifrancesca comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT rossiriccardo comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT mortegabrieledella comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT caputomatteo comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT pascalivincenzol comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT ozonoffal comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims AT olivaantonio comparativeimpactanalysisoflowdeductibleinsuranceversusinhousehospitalassumptionofriskandmanagementonmedicalmalpracticeclaims |