Cargando…

HEMOPERFUSION USING THE LPS-SELECTIVE MESOPOROUS POLYMERIC ADSORBENT IN SEPTIC SHOCK: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Extracorporeal hemoperfusion (EHP) may improve the course and outcomes of patients with septic shock by targeting cytokines or bacterial endotoxins (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]). Here, we present the results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04827407) to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rey, Sergei, Kulabukhov, Vladimir M., Popov, Alexander, Nikitina, Olga, Berdnikov, Gennady, Magomedov, Marat, Kim, Timur, Masolitin, Sergei, Ignatenko, Olga, Krotenko, Nikolai, Marysheva, Anastasia, Chaus, Nikolai, Ohinko, Leonid, Mendibaev, Makarii, Chumachenko, Anastasia, Pisarev, Vladimir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37018802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002121
_version_ 1785050872070275072
author Rey, Sergei
Kulabukhov, Vladimir M.
Popov, Alexander
Nikitina, Olga
Berdnikov, Gennady
Magomedov, Marat
Kim, Timur
Masolitin, Sergei
Ignatenko, Olga
Krotenko, Nikolai
Marysheva, Anastasia
Chaus, Nikolai
Ohinko, Leonid
Mendibaev, Makarii
Chumachenko, Anastasia
Pisarev, Vladimir
author_facet Rey, Sergei
Kulabukhov, Vladimir M.
Popov, Alexander
Nikitina, Olga
Berdnikov, Gennady
Magomedov, Marat
Kim, Timur
Masolitin, Sergei
Ignatenko, Olga
Krotenko, Nikolai
Marysheva, Anastasia
Chaus, Nikolai
Ohinko, Leonid
Mendibaev, Makarii
Chumachenko, Anastasia
Pisarev, Vladimir
author_sort Rey, Sergei
collection PubMed
description Extracorporeal hemoperfusion (EHP) may improve the course and outcomes of patients with septic shock by targeting cytokines or bacterial endotoxins (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]). Here, we present the results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04827407) to assess the efficiency and safety of Efferon LPS hemoperfusion cartridges engineered for multimodal targeting LPS, host-derived cytokine, and damage-associated molecule pattern molecules. Patients with intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) and septic shock (Sepsis-3) were subjected to EHP procedures (n = 38). Control patients with IAS and septic shock (n = 20) were treated using conventional protocols without EHP. The primary end point was resolution of septic shock. Secondary end points included MAP, vasopressor drug dose, partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and satisfaction with device use by a 5-point Likert scale. Clinical laboratory tests for a blood cells count, lactate and creatinine concentration, nephelometry test for C-reactive protein, immunochemiluminescent test for procalcitonin, and immunoenzyme analysis for IL-6 concentration were used to monitor the EHP effect versus the control group. Data were analyzed followed the intention-to-treat approach. Wilcoxon STATA 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) and Excel 2019 with XLStat 2019 add-in (Addinsoft, Paris, France) were used for statistical analysis of the results. The Fine and Gray method of competing risks was used to analyze the primary end point and other data representing the time to event. EHP resulted in a significant and rapid increase in MAP and partial pressure arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, progressive decline in norepinephrine doses, and multiorgan deficiency, as evaluated by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores. Importantly, EHP led to significantly rapid cumulative mechanical ventilation weaning compared with the control group (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.5; P = 0.037). Early 3-day mortality was significantly reduced in the Efferon LPS versus control group; however, no significant improvements in survival in 14 and 28 days were revealed. Laboratory tests showed rapidly decreased levels of LPS, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, IL-6, creatinine, leukocytes, and neutrophils only in the Efferon LPS group. Results demonstrate that EHP with Efferon LPS is a safe procedure to abrogate septic shock and normalize clinical and pathogenically relevant biomarkers in patients with IAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10227945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102279452023-05-31 HEMOPERFUSION USING THE LPS-SELECTIVE MESOPOROUS POLYMERIC ADSORBENT IN SEPTIC SHOCK: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL Rey, Sergei Kulabukhov, Vladimir M. Popov, Alexander Nikitina, Olga Berdnikov, Gennady Magomedov, Marat Kim, Timur Masolitin, Sergei Ignatenko, Olga Krotenko, Nikolai Marysheva, Anastasia Chaus, Nikolai Ohinko, Leonid Mendibaev, Makarii Chumachenko, Anastasia Pisarev, Vladimir Shock Clinical Science Aspects Extracorporeal hemoperfusion (EHP) may improve the course and outcomes of patients with septic shock by targeting cytokines or bacterial endotoxins (lipopolysaccharide [LPS]). Here, we present the results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04827407) to assess the efficiency and safety of Efferon LPS hemoperfusion cartridges engineered for multimodal targeting LPS, host-derived cytokine, and damage-associated molecule pattern molecules. Patients with intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) and septic shock (Sepsis-3) were subjected to EHP procedures (n = 38). Control patients with IAS and septic shock (n = 20) were treated using conventional protocols without EHP. The primary end point was resolution of septic shock. Secondary end points included MAP, vasopressor drug dose, partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and satisfaction with device use by a 5-point Likert scale. Clinical laboratory tests for a blood cells count, lactate and creatinine concentration, nephelometry test for C-reactive protein, immunochemiluminescent test for procalcitonin, and immunoenzyme analysis for IL-6 concentration were used to monitor the EHP effect versus the control group. Data were analyzed followed the intention-to-treat approach. Wilcoxon STATA 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX) and Excel 2019 with XLStat 2019 add-in (Addinsoft, Paris, France) were used for statistical analysis of the results. The Fine and Gray method of competing risks was used to analyze the primary end point and other data representing the time to event. EHP resulted in a significant and rapid increase in MAP and partial pressure arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, progressive decline in norepinephrine doses, and multiorgan deficiency, as evaluated by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores. Importantly, EHP led to significantly rapid cumulative mechanical ventilation weaning compared with the control group (subdistribution hazard ratio, 2.5; P = 0.037). Early 3-day mortality was significantly reduced in the Efferon LPS versus control group; however, no significant improvements in survival in 14 and 28 days were revealed. Laboratory tests showed rapidly decreased levels of LPS, procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, IL-6, creatinine, leukocytes, and neutrophils only in the Efferon LPS group. Results demonstrate that EHP with Efferon LPS is a safe procedure to abrogate septic shock and normalize clinical and pathogenically relevant biomarkers in patients with IAS. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-06 2023-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10227945/ /pubmed/37018802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002121 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Sports Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Clinical Science Aspects
Rey, Sergei
Kulabukhov, Vladimir M.
Popov, Alexander
Nikitina, Olga
Berdnikov, Gennady
Magomedov, Marat
Kim, Timur
Masolitin, Sergei
Ignatenko, Olga
Krotenko, Nikolai
Marysheva, Anastasia
Chaus, Nikolai
Ohinko, Leonid
Mendibaev, Makarii
Chumachenko, Anastasia
Pisarev, Vladimir
HEMOPERFUSION USING THE LPS-SELECTIVE MESOPOROUS POLYMERIC ADSORBENT IN SEPTIC SHOCK: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
title HEMOPERFUSION USING THE LPS-SELECTIVE MESOPOROUS POLYMERIC ADSORBENT IN SEPTIC SHOCK: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
title_full HEMOPERFUSION USING THE LPS-SELECTIVE MESOPOROUS POLYMERIC ADSORBENT IN SEPTIC SHOCK: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
title_fullStr HEMOPERFUSION USING THE LPS-SELECTIVE MESOPOROUS POLYMERIC ADSORBENT IN SEPTIC SHOCK: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
title_full_unstemmed HEMOPERFUSION USING THE LPS-SELECTIVE MESOPOROUS POLYMERIC ADSORBENT IN SEPTIC SHOCK: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
title_short HEMOPERFUSION USING THE LPS-SELECTIVE MESOPOROUS POLYMERIC ADSORBENT IN SEPTIC SHOCK: A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
title_sort hemoperfusion using the lps-selective mesoporous polymeric adsorbent in septic shock: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
topic Clinical Science Aspects
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10227945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37018802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002121
work_keys_str_mv AT reysergei hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kulabukhovvladimirm hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT popovalexander hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT nikitinaolga hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT berdnikovgennady hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT magomedovmarat hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT kimtimur hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT masolitinsergei hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ignatenkoolga hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT krotenkonikolai hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT maryshevaanastasia hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT chausnikolai hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT ohinkoleonid hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT mendibaevmakarii hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT chumachenkoanastasia hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT pisarevvladimir hemoperfusionusingthelpsselectivemesoporouspolymericadsorbentinsepticshockamulticenterrandomizedclinicaltrial