Cargando…

Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments are key settings for suicide prevention. Most people are deemed to be at no or low risk in final contacts before death. AIM: To micro-analyse how clinicians ask about suicidal ideation and/or self-harm in emergency department psychosocial assessments and how patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCabe, Rose, Bergen, Clara, Lomas, Matthew, Ryan, Mary, Albert, Rikke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37226481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.32
_version_ 1785050934219374592
author McCabe, Rose
Bergen, Clara
Lomas, Matthew
Ryan, Mary
Albert, Rikke
author_facet McCabe, Rose
Bergen, Clara
Lomas, Matthew
Ryan, Mary
Albert, Rikke
author_sort McCabe, Rose
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency departments are key settings for suicide prevention. Most people are deemed to be at no or low risk in final contacts before death. AIM: To micro-analyse how clinicians ask about suicidal ideation and/or self-harm in emergency department psychosocial assessments and how patients respond. METHOD: Forty-six psychosocial assessments between mental health clinicians and people with suicidal ideation and/or self-harm were video-recorded. Verbal and non-verbal features of 55 question–answer sequences about self-harm thoughts and/or actions were micro-analysed using conversation analysis. Fisher's exact test was used to test the hypothesis that question type was associated with patient disclosure. RESULTS: (a) Eighty-four per cent of initial questions (N = 46/55) were closed yes/no questions about self-harm thoughts and/or feelings, plans to self-harm, potential for future self-harm, predicting risk of future self-harm and being okay or keeping safe. Patients disclosed minimal information in response to closed questions, whereas open questions elicited ambivalent and information rich responses. (b) All closed questions were leading, with 54% inviting no and 46% inviting yes. When patients were asked no-inviting questions, the disclosure rate was 8%, compared to 65% when asked yes-inviting questions (P < 0.05 Fisher's exact test). (c) Patients struggled to respond when asked to predict future self-harm or guarantee safety. (d) Half of closed questions had a narrow timeframe (e.g. at the moment, overnight) or were tied to possible discharge. CONCLUSION: Across assessments, there is a bias towards not uncovering thoughts and plans of self-harm through the cumulative effect of leading questions that invite a no response, their narrow timeframe and tying questions to possible discharge. Open questions, yes-inviting questions and asking how people feel about the future facilitate disclosure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10228282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102282822023-05-31 Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm McCabe, Rose Bergen, Clara Lomas, Matthew Ryan, Mary Albert, Rikke BJPsych Open Paper BACKGROUND: Emergency departments are key settings for suicide prevention. Most people are deemed to be at no or low risk in final contacts before death. AIM: To micro-analyse how clinicians ask about suicidal ideation and/or self-harm in emergency department psychosocial assessments and how patients respond. METHOD: Forty-six psychosocial assessments between mental health clinicians and people with suicidal ideation and/or self-harm were video-recorded. Verbal and non-verbal features of 55 question–answer sequences about self-harm thoughts and/or actions were micro-analysed using conversation analysis. Fisher's exact test was used to test the hypothesis that question type was associated with patient disclosure. RESULTS: (a) Eighty-four per cent of initial questions (N = 46/55) were closed yes/no questions about self-harm thoughts and/or feelings, plans to self-harm, potential for future self-harm, predicting risk of future self-harm and being okay or keeping safe. Patients disclosed minimal information in response to closed questions, whereas open questions elicited ambivalent and information rich responses. (b) All closed questions were leading, with 54% inviting no and 46% inviting yes. When patients were asked no-inviting questions, the disclosure rate was 8%, compared to 65% when asked yes-inviting questions (P < 0.05 Fisher's exact test). (c) Patients struggled to respond when asked to predict future self-harm or guarantee safety. (d) Half of closed questions had a narrow timeframe (e.g. at the moment, overnight) or were tied to possible discharge. CONCLUSION: Across assessments, there is a bias towards not uncovering thoughts and plans of self-harm through the cumulative effect of leading questions that invite a no response, their narrow timeframe and tying questions to possible discharge. Open questions, yes-inviting questions and asking how people feel about the future facilitate disclosure. Cambridge University Press 2023-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10228282/ /pubmed/37226481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.32 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Paper
McCabe, Rose
Bergen, Clara
Lomas, Matthew
Ryan, Mary
Albert, Rikke
Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
title Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
title_full Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
title_fullStr Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
title_full_unstemmed Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
title_short Asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
title_sort asking about self-harm during risk assessment in psychosocial assessments in the emergency department: questions that facilitate and deter disclosure of self-harm
topic Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37226481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.32
work_keys_str_mv AT mccaberose askingaboutselfharmduringriskassessmentinpsychosocialassessmentsintheemergencydepartmentquestionsthatfacilitateanddeterdisclosureofselfharm
AT bergenclara askingaboutselfharmduringriskassessmentinpsychosocialassessmentsintheemergencydepartmentquestionsthatfacilitateanddeterdisclosureofselfharm
AT lomasmatthew askingaboutselfharmduringriskassessmentinpsychosocialassessmentsintheemergencydepartmentquestionsthatfacilitateanddeterdisclosureofselfharm
AT ryanmary askingaboutselfharmduringriskassessmentinpsychosocialassessmentsintheemergencydepartmentquestionsthatfacilitateanddeterdisclosureofselfharm
AT albertrikke askingaboutselfharmduringriskassessmentinpsychosocialassessmentsintheemergencydepartmentquestionsthatfacilitateanddeterdisclosureofselfharm