Cargando…

Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND: Studies have classified muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) into primary (initially muscle-invasive, PMIBC) and secondary subtypes (initially non-muscle-invasive but progresses, SMIBC), for which controversial survival outcomes were demonstrated. This study aimed to compare the surviva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lok, Waichan, Zhang, Jiapeng, Zheng, Xiaonan, Lin, Tianhai, Xu, Hang, Tan, Ping, Wei, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002512
_version_ 1785050972467232768
author Lok, Waichan
Zhang, Jiapeng
Zheng, Xiaonan
Lin, Tianhai
Xu, Hang
Tan, Ping
Wei, Qiang
author_facet Lok, Waichan
Zhang, Jiapeng
Zheng, Xiaonan
Lin, Tianhai
Xu, Hang
Tan, Ping
Wei, Qiang
author_sort Lok, Waichan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have classified muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) into primary (initially muscle-invasive, PMIBC) and secondary subtypes (initially non-muscle-invasive but progresses, SMIBC), for which controversial survival outcomes were demonstrated. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes between PMIBC and SMIBC patients in China. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PMIBC or SMIBC at West China Hospital from January 2009 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher tests were employed to compare clinicopathological characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox competing proportional risk model were used to compare survival outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to reduce the bias and subgroup analysis was used to confirm the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 405 MIBC patients were enrolled, including 286 PMIBC and 119 SMIBC, with a mean follow-up of 27.54 and 53.30 months, respectively. The SMIBC group had a higher proportion of older patients (17.65% [21/119] vs. 9.09% [26/286]), chronic disease (32.77% [39/119] vs. 22.38% [64/286]), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (19.33% [23/119] vs. 8.04% [23/286]). Before matching, SMIBC had a lower risk of overall mortality (OM) (hazard ratios [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–0.85, P = 0.005) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.94, P = 0.022) after the initial diagnosis. However, higher risks of OM (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02–2.10, P = 0.038) and CSM (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09–2.29, P = 0.016) were observed for SMIBC once it became muscle-invasive. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of 146 patients (73 for each group) were well matched, and SMIBC was confirmed to have an increased CSM risk (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09–3.06, P = 0.021) than PMIBC after muscle invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PMIBC, SMIBC had worse survival outcomes once it became muscle-invasive. Specific attention should be paid to non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a high progression risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10228478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102284782023-05-31 Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study Lok, Waichan Zhang, Jiapeng Zheng, Xiaonan Lin, Tianhai Xu, Hang Tan, Ping Wei, Qiang Chin Med J (Engl) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Studies have classified muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) into primary (initially muscle-invasive, PMIBC) and secondary subtypes (initially non-muscle-invasive but progresses, SMIBC), for which controversial survival outcomes were demonstrated. This study aimed to compare the survival outcomes between PMIBC and SMIBC patients in China. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with PMIBC or SMIBC at West China Hospital from January 2009 to June 2019 were retrospectively included. Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher tests were employed to compare clinicopathological characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox competing proportional risk model were used to compare survival outcomes. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to reduce the bias and subgroup analysis was used to confirm the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 405 MIBC patients were enrolled, including 286 PMIBC and 119 SMIBC, with a mean follow-up of 27.54 and 53.30 months, respectively. The SMIBC group had a higher proportion of older patients (17.65% [21/119] vs. 9.09% [26/286]), chronic disease (32.77% [39/119] vs. 22.38% [64/286]), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (19.33% [23/119] vs. 8.04% [23/286]). Before matching, SMIBC had a lower risk of overall mortality (OM) (hazard ratios [HR] 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–0.85, P = 0.005) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44–0.94, P = 0.022) after the initial diagnosis. However, higher risks of OM (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02–2.10, P = 0.038) and CSM (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09–2.29, P = 0.016) were observed for SMIBC once it became muscle-invasive. After PSM, the baseline characteristics of 146 patients (73 for each group) were well matched, and SMIBC was confirmed to have an increased CSM risk (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.09–3.06, P = 0.021) than PMIBC after muscle invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PMIBC, SMIBC had worse survival outcomes once it became muscle-invasive. Specific attention should be paid to non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a high progression risk. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-05 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10228478/ /pubmed/37014771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002512 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Lok, Waichan
Zhang, Jiapeng
Zheng, Xiaonan
Lin, Tianhai
Xu, Hang
Tan, Ping
Wei, Qiang
Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study
title Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study
title_full Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study
title_fullStr Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study
title_short Comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study
title_sort comparison of the survival outcomes between primary and secondary muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a propensity score-matched study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37014771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002512
work_keys_str_mv AT lokwaichan comparisonofthesurvivaloutcomesbetweenprimaryandsecondarymuscleinvasivebladdercancerapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT zhangjiapeng comparisonofthesurvivaloutcomesbetweenprimaryandsecondarymuscleinvasivebladdercancerapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT zhengxiaonan comparisonofthesurvivaloutcomesbetweenprimaryandsecondarymuscleinvasivebladdercancerapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT lintianhai comparisonofthesurvivaloutcomesbetweenprimaryandsecondarymuscleinvasivebladdercancerapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT xuhang comparisonofthesurvivaloutcomesbetweenprimaryandsecondarymuscleinvasivebladdercancerapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT tanping comparisonofthesurvivaloutcomesbetweenprimaryandsecondarymuscleinvasivebladdercancerapropensityscorematchedstudy
AT weiqiang comparisonofthesurvivaloutcomesbetweenprimaryandsecondarymuscleinvasivebladdercancerapropensityscorematchedstudy