Cargando…

Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a more effective approach and has the potential to detect lung cancer more accurately. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of population-based screening studies primarily assessing baseline LDCT screening for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Lanwei, Yu, Yue, Yang, Funa, Gao, Wendong, Wang, Yu, Xiao, Yao, Du, Jia, Tian, Jinhui, Yang, Haiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002353
_version_ 1785050973663657984
author Guo, Lanwei
Yu, Yue
Yang, Funa
Gao, Wendong
Wang, Yu
Xiao, Yao
Du, Jia
Tian, Jinhui
Yang, Haiyan
author_facet Guo, Lanwei
Yu, Yue
Yang, Funa
Gao, Wendong
Wang, Yu
Xiao, Yao
Du, Jia
Tian, Jinhui
Yang, Haiyan
author_sort Guo, Lanwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a more effective approach and has the potential to detect lung cancer more accurately. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of population-based screening studies primarily assessing baseline LDCT screening for lung cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database, and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to April 10, 2022. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data of true positives, false-positives, false negatives, and true negatives in the screening test were extracted. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. A bivariate random effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was measured using the Higgins I(2) statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using a Deeks’ funnel plot and linear regression test. RESULTS: A total of 49 studies with 157,762 individuals were identified for the final qualitative synthesis; most of them were from Europe and America (38 studies), ten were from Asia, and one was from Oceania. The recruitment period was 1992 to 2018, and most of the subjects were 40 to 75 years old. The analysis showed that the AUC of lung cancer screening by LDCT was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99), and the overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82–0.91), respectively. The funnel plot and test results showed that there was no significant publication bias among the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline LDCT has high sensitivity and specificity as a screening technique for lung cancer. However, long-term follow-up of the whole study population (including those with a negative baseline screening result) should be performed to enhance the accuracy of LDCT screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10228483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102284832023-05-31 Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis Guo, Lanwei Yu, Yue Yang, Funa Gao, Wendong Wang, Yu Xiao, Yao Du, Jia Tian, Jinhui Yang, Haiyan Chin Med J (Engl) Meta Analysis BACKGROUND: Screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a more effective approach and has the potential to detect lung cancer more accurately. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the accuracy of population-based screening studies primarily assessing baseline LDCT screening for lung cancer. METHODS: MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica Database, and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to April 10, 2022. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the data of true positives, false-positives, false negatives, and true negatives in the screening test were extracted. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. A bivariate random effects model was used to estimate pooled sensitivity and specificity. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics analysis. Heterogeneity between studies was measured using the Higgins I(2) statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using a Deeks’ funnel plot and linear regression test. RESULTS: A total of 49 studies with 157,762 individuals were identified for the final qualitative synthesis; most of them were from Europe and America (38 studies), ten were from Asia, and one was from Oceania. The recruitment period was 1992 to 2018, and most of the subjects were 40 to 75 years old. The analysis showed that the AUC of lung cancer screening by LDCT was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99), and the overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82–0.91), respectively. The funnel plot and test results showed that there was no significant publication bias among the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline LDCT has high sensitivity and specificity as a screening technique for lung cancer. However, long-term follow-up of the whole study population (including those with a negative baseline screening result) should be performed to enhance the accuracy of LDCT screening. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-05-05 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10228483/ /pubmed/37101352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002353 Text en Copyright © 2023 The Chinese Medical Association, produced by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. under the CC-BY-NC-ND license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Meta Analysis
Guo, Lanwei
Yu, Yue
Yang, Funa
Gao, Wendong
Wang, Yu
Xiao, Yao
Du, Jia
Tian, Jinhui
Yang, Haiyan
Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort accuracy of baseline low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37101352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002353
work_keys_str_mv AT guolanwei accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuyue accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangfuna accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gaowendong accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangyu accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaoyao accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dujia accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianjinhui accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanghaiyan accuracyofbaselinelowdosecomputedtomographylungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis