Cargando…

In atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for brain infarction, which can lead to epilepsy. We aimed to investigate whether treatment of AF with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) affects the risk of epilepsy in comparison to treatment with the vitamin K antagonist phenprocoumon (PPC). METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Platzbecker, Katharina, Müller-Fielitz, Helge, Foraita, Ronja, Koepp, Matthias J, Voss, Annemarie, Pflock, René, Linder, Roland, Pigeot, Iris, Schink, Tania, Schwaninger, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad087
_version_ 1785050987818385408
author Platzbecker, Katharina
Müller-Fielitz, Helge
Foraita, Ronja
Koepp, Matthias J
Voss, Annemarie
Pflock, René
Linder, Roland
Pigeot, Iris
Schink, Tania
Schwaninger, Markus
author_facet Platzbecker, Katharina
Müller-Fielitz, Helge
Foraita, Ronja
Koepp, Matthias J
Voss, Annemarie
Pflock, René
Linder, Roland
Pigeot, Iris
Schink, Tania
Schwaninger, Markus
author_sort Platzbecker, Katharina
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for brain infarction, which can lead to epilepsy. We aimed to investigate whether treatment of AF with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) affects the risk of epilepsy in comparison to treatment with the vitamin K antagonist phenprocoumon (PPC). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an active comparator, nested case-control study based on the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database that includes claims data from statutory health insurance providers of about 25 million persons since 2004. In 2011–17, 227 707 AF patients initiated treatment with a DOAC or PPC, of which 1828 cases developed epilepsy on current treatment with an oral anticoagulant. They were matched to 19 084 controls without epilepsy. Patients with DOAC treatment for AF had an overall higher risk of epilepsy with an odds ratio of 1.39, 95% CI (1.24; 1.55) compared to current PPC treatment. Cases had higher baseline CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores and more frequently a history of stroke than controls. After excluding patients with ischaemic stroke prior to the diagnosis of epilepsy, the risk of epilepsy was still higher on DOACs than on PPC. In contrast, within a cohort of patients with venous thromboembolism, the risk of epilepsy on treatment with DOACs was less elevated [adjusted odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI (0.98; 1.34)]. CONCLUSION: In patients with AF initiating oral anticoagulation, treatment with a DOAC was associated with an increased risk of epilepsy compared to the vitamin K antagonist PPC. Covert brain infarction may explain the observed elevated risk of epilepsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10228540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102285402023-05-31 In atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study Platzbecker, Katharina Müller-Fielitz, Helge Foraita, Ronja Koepp, Matthias J Voss, Annemarie Pflock, René Linder, Roland Pigeot, Iris Schink, Tania Schwaninger, Markus Europace Clinical Research AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a risk factor for brain infarction, which can lead to epilepsy. We aimed to investigate whether treatment of AF with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) affects the risk of epilepsy in comparison to treatment with the vitamin K antagonist phenprocoumon (PPC). METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an active comparator, nested case-control study based on the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database that includes claims data from statutory health insurance providers of about 25 million persons since 2004. In 2011–17, 227 707 AF patients initiated treatment with a DOAC or PPC, of which 1828 cases developed epilepsy on current treatment with an oral anticoagulant. They were matched to 19 084 controls without epilepsy. Patients with DOAC treatment for AF had an overall higher risk of epilepsy with an odds ratio of 1.39, 95% CI (1.24; 1.55) compared to current PPC treatment. Cases had higher baseline CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc scores and more frequently a history of stroke than controls. After excluding patients with ischaemic stroke prior to the diagnosis of epilepsy, the risk of epilepsy was still higher on DOACs than on PPC. In contrast, within a cohort of patients with venous thromboembolism, the risk of epilepsy on treatment with DOACs was less elevated [adjusted odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI (0.98; 1.34)]. CONCLUSION: In patients with AF initiating oral anticoagulation, treatment with a DOAC was associated with an increased risk of epilepsy compared to the vitamin K antagonist PPC. Covert brain infarction may explain the observed elevated risk of epilepsy. Oxford University Press 2023-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10228540/ /pubmed/37013704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad087 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Platzbecker, Katharina
Müller-Fielitz, Helge
Foraita, Ronja
Koepp, Matthias J
Voss, Annemarie
Pflock, René
Linder, Roland
Pigeot, Iris
Schink, Tania
Schwaninger, Markus
In atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study
title In atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study
title_full In atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study
title_fullStr In atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study
title_full_unstemmed In atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study
title_short In atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study
title_sort in atrial fibrillation epilepsy risk differs between oral anticoagulants: active comparator, nested case-control study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37013704
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euad087
work_keys_str_mv AT platzbeckerkatharina inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT mullerfielitzhelge inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT foraitaronja inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT koeppmatthiasj inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT vossannemarie inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT pflockrene inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT linderroland inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT pigeotiris inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT schinktania inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy
AT schwaningermarkus inatrialfibrillationepilepsyriskdiffersbetweenoralanticoagulantsactivecomparatornestedcasecontrolstudy