Cargando…

Small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction

BACKGROUND: The stratification of the general population according to health needs allows to provide better-tailored services. A simple score called Multisource Comorbidity Score (MCS) has been developed and validated for predicting several outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rea, Federico, Ferrante, Mauro, Scondotto, Salvatore, Corrao, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128377
_version_ 1785051029240283136
author Rea, Federico
Ferrante, Mauro
Scondotto, Salvatore
Corrao, Giovanni
author_facet Rea, Federico
Ferrante, Mauro
Scondotto, Salvatore
Corrao, Giovanni
author_sort Rea, Federico
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The stratification of the general population according to health needs allows to provide better-tailored services. A simple score called Multisource Comorbidity Score (MCS) has been developed and validated for predicting several outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the ability of MCS in predicting 1-year mortality improves by incorporating socioeconomic data (as measured by a deprivation index). METHODS: Beneficiaries of the Italian National Health Service who in the index year (2018) were aged 50–85 years and were resident in the Sicily region for at least 2 years were identified. For each individual, the MCS was calculated according to his/her clinical profile, and the deprivation index of the census unit level of the individual’s residence was collected. Frailty models were fitted to assess the relationship between the indexes (MCS and deprivation index) and 1-year mortality. Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion statistics were used to compare the goodness of fit of the model that included only MCS and the model that also contained the deprivation index. The models were further compared by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The final cohort included 1,062,221 individuals, with a mortality rate of 15.6 deaths per 1,000 person-years. Both MCS and deprivation index were positively associated with mortality. The goodness of fit statistics of the two models were very similar. For MCS only and MCS plus deprivation index models, Akaike information criterion were 17,013 and 17,038, respectively, whereas Bayesian information criterion were 16,997 and 17,000, respectively. The AUC values were 0.78 for both models. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that socioeconomic features as measured by the deprivation index did not improve the capability of MCS in predicting 1-year risk of death. Future studies are needed to investigate other sources of data to enhance the risk stratification of populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10228715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102287152023-05-31 Small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction Rea, Federico Ferrante, Mauro Scondotto, Salvatore Corrao, Giovanni Front Public Health Public Health BACKGROUND: The stratification of the general population according to health needs allows to provide better-tailored services. A simple score called Multisource Comorbidity Score (MCS) has been developed and validated for predicting several outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the ability of MCS in predicting 1-year mortality improves by incorporating socioeconomic data (as measured by a deprivation index). METHODS: Beneficiaries of the Italian National Health Service who in the index year (2018) were aged 50–85 years and were resident in the Sicily region for at least 2 years were identified. For each individual, the MCS was calculated according to his/her clinical profile, and the deprivation index of the census unit level of the individual’s residence was collected. Frailty models were fitted to assess the relationship between the indexes (MCS and deprivation index) and 1-year mortality. Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion statistics were used to compare the goodness of fit of the model that included only MCS and the model that also contained the deprivation index. The models were further compared by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: The final cohort included 1,062,221 individuals, with a mortality rate of 15.6 deaths per 1,000 person-years. Both MCS and deprivation index were positively associated with mortality. The goodness of fit statistics of the two models were very similar. For MCS only and MCS plus deprivation index models, Akaike information criterion were 17,013 and 17,038, respectively, whereas Bayesian information criterion were 16,997 and 17,000, respectively. The AUC values were 0.78 for both models. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that socioeconomic features as measured by the deprivation index did not improve the capability of MCS in predicting 1-year risk of death. Future studies are needed to investigate other sources of data to enhance the risk stratification of populations. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10228715/ /pubmed/37261238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128377 Text en Copyright © 2023 Rea, Ferrante, Scondotto and Corrao. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Rea, Federico
Ferrante, Mauro
Scondotto, Salvatore
Corrao, Giovanni
Small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction
title Small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction
title_full Small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction
title_fullStr Small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction
title_full_unstemmed Small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction
title_short Small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction
title_sort small-area deprivation index does not improve the capability of multisource comorbidity score in mortality prediction
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261238
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128377
work_keys_str_mv AT reafederico smallareadeprivationindexdoesnotimprovethecapabilityofmultisourcecomorbidityscoreinmortalityprediction
AT ferrantemauro smallareadeprivationindexdoesnotimprovethecapabilityofmultisourcecomorbidityscoreinmortalityprediction
AT scondottosalvatore smallareadeprivationindexdoesnotimprovethecapabilityofmultisourcecomorbidityscoreinmortalityprediction
AT corraogiovanni smallareadeprivationindexdoesnotimprovethecapabilityofmultisourcecomorbidityscoreinmortalityprediction