Cargando…

Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing. METHODS: This was a prospective study. A total 120 patients divided into groups of 40 each were recruited from the glaucoma outpatient department (OP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maheshwari, Devendra, Nair, Aditi, Tara, Techi Dodum, Pawar, Neelam, Ramakrishnan, Rengappa, Selvi, D Ranitha Guna, Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727362
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1499_22
_version_ 1785051103362023424
author Maheshwari, Devendra
Nair, Aditi
Tara, Techi Dodum
Pawar, Neelam
Ramakrishnan, Rengappa
Selvi, D Ranitha Guna
Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq
author_facet Maheshwari, Devendra
Nair, Aditi
Tara, Techi Dodum
Pawar, Neelam
Ramakrishnan, Rengappa
Selvi, D Ranitha Guna
Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq
author_sort Maheshwari, Devendra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing. METHODS: This was a prospective study. A total 120 patients divided into groups of 40 each were recruited from the glaucoma outpatient department (OPD). All patients were aged 35–75 years with no previous experience of performing HFA. Patients with hearing impairment, any other cognitive impairment, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤6/36 on Snellen’s visual acuity were excluded. The first two groups were given strict (conservative) and lenient (liberal) verbal instructions. The instructions were adapted from those listed in the manufacturer’s instruction. and the third group was shown a standard video depicting in detail how perimetry was to be performed. A questionnaire was given to each patient before and after the test to assess the patient’s performance. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with glaucoma during testing in each group were 29 (72.50%), 30 (75.0%), and 33 (82.5%) in the video instructed, strictly verbal, and leniently verbal groups, respectively. The overall mean deviation (MD) in the right eye (RE) was of − 3.38 (−4.9 to 1.9) and in the left eye (LE) was − 3.96 (−6.4 to − 1.9). Reliable field was slightly higher for the video instructed group (47.5%) and lowest for the strictly verbal group (22.5%) (P = 0.033). A higher number of patients were very motivated in the video instructed group (27%) (P = 0.041). Post-test questionnaires showed that 40% of patients felt they have performed the test with 100% accuracy in video group with less guessing. A higher number of patients in the video instructed group (85%) felt instruction was helpful in performing the test (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The video groups were more motivated and had better confidence to perform the test with less anxiety and stress and with probably better understanding of the procedure due to visual effects enhancing their understanding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10228957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-102289572023-05-31 Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing Maheshwari, Devendra Nair, Aditi Tara, Techi Dodum Pawar, Neelam Ramakrishnan, Rengappa Selvi, D Ranitha Guna Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing. METHODS: This was a prospective study. A total 120 patients divided into groups of 40 each were recruited from the glaucoma outpatient department (OPD). All patients were aged 35–75 years with no previous experience of performing HFA. Patients with hearing impairment, any other cognitive impairment, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤6/36 on Snellen’s visual acuity were excluded. The first two groups were given strict (conservative) and lenient (liberal) verbal instructions. The instructions were adapted from those listed in the manufacturer’s instruction. and the third group was shown a standard video depicting in detail how perimetry was to be performed. A questionnaire was given to each patient before and after the test to assess the patient’s performance. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with glaucoma during testing in each group were 29 (72.50%), 30 (75.0%), and 33 (82.5%) in the video instructed, strictly verbal, and leniently verbal groups, respectively. The overall mean deviation (MD) in the right eye (RE) was of − 3.38 (−4.9 to 1.9) and in the left eye (LE) was − 3.96 (−6.4 to − 1.9). Reliable field was slightly higher for the video instructed group (47.5%) and lowest for the strictly verbal group (22.5%) (P = 0.033). A higher number of patients were very motivated in the video instructed group (27%) (P = 0.041). Post-test questionnaires showed that 40% of patients felt they have performed the test with 100% accuracy in video group with less guessing. A higher number of patients in the video instructed group (85%) felt instruction was helpful in performing the test (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The video groups were more motivated and had better confidence to perform the test with less anxiety and stress and with probably better understanding of the procedure due to visual effects enhancing their understanding. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-02 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10228957/ /pubmed/36727362 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1499_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Maheshwari, Devendra
Nair, Aditi
Tara, Techi Dodum
Pawar, Neelam
Ramakrishnan, Rengappa
Selvi, D Ranitha Guna
Uduman, Mohammed Sithiq
Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing
title Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing
title_full Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing
title_fullStr Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing
title_short Comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated Humphrey visual field testing
title_sort comparison of the effect of audiovisual and verbal instructions on patient performance while performing automated humphrey visual field testing
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727362
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1499_22
work_keys_str_mv AT maheshwaridevendra comparisonoftheeffectofaudiovisualandverbalinstructionsonpatientperformancewhileperformingautomatedhumphreyvisualfieldtesting
AT nairaditi comparisonoftheeffectofaudiovisualandverbalinstructionsonpatientperformancewhileperformingautomatedhumphreyvisualfieldtesting
AT taratechidodum comparisonoftheeffectofaudiovisualandverbalinstructionsonpatientperformancewhileperformingautomatedhumphreyvisualfieldtesting
AT pawarneelam comparisonoftheeffectofaudiovisualandverbalinstructionsonpatientperformancewhileperformingautomatedhumphreyvisualfieldtesting
AT ramakrishnanrengappa comparisonoftheeffectofaudiovisualandverbalinstructionsonpatientperformancewhileperformingautomatedhumphreyvisualfieldtesting
AT selvidranithaguna comparisonoftheeffectofaudiovisualandverbalinstructionsonpatientperformancewhileperformingautomatedhumphreyvisualfieldtesting
AT udumanmohammedsithiq comparisonoftheeffectofaudiovisualandverbalinstructionsonpatientperformancewhileperformingautomatedhumphreyvisualfieldtesting