Cargando…

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in ocular oncology: Retinoblastoma

PURPOSE: This study was done to explore the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in the diagnosis and grouping of intraocular retinoblastoma (iRB). METHODS: It was a retrospective observational study using AI and Machine learning, Computer Vision (OpenCV). RESULTS: Of 771 fun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaliki, Swathi, Vempuluru, Vijitha S, Ghose, Neha, Patil, Gaurav, Viriyala, Rajiv, Dhara, Krishna K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36727332
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1393_22
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: This study was done to explore the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in the diagnosis and grouping of intraocular retinoblastoma (iRB). METHODS: It was a retrospective observational study using AI and Machine learning, Computer Vision (OpenCV). RESULTS: Of 771 fundus images of 109 eyes, 181 images had no tumor and 590 images displayed iRB based on review by two independent ocular oncologists (with an interobserver variability of <1%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the trained AI model were 85%, 99%, 99.6%, and 67%, respectively. Of 109 eyes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detection of RB by AI model were 96%, 94%, 97%, and 91%, respectively. Of these, the eyes were normal (n = 31) or belonged to groupA (n=1), B (n=22), C (n=8), D (n=23),and E (n=24) RB based on review by two independent ocular oncologists (with an interobserver variability of 0%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the trained AI model were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for group A; 82%, 20 21 98%, 90%, and 96% for group B; 63%, 99%, 83%, and 97% for group C; 78%, 98%, 90%, and 94% for group D, and 92%, 91%, 73%, and 98% for group E, respectively. CONCLUSION: Based on our study, we conclude that the AI model for iRB is highly sensitive in the detection of RB with high specificity for the classification of iRB.