Cargando…
How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions
The objective of this article is to describe a simplified process for building and assessing the quality of healthcare-related research questions. This process consisted of three stages. The first stage aimed to select and explore a field of science. This field would be the area for which to identif...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Innovative Healthcare Institute
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260836 http://dx.doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-21-17 |
_version_ | 1785051134379950080 |
---|---|
author | Ubeda, Sergio Ramón Gutiérrez |
author_facet | Ubeda, Sergio Ramón Gutiérrez |
author_sort | Ubeda, Sergio Ramón Gutiérrez |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this article is to describe a simplified process for building and assessing the quality of healthcare-related research questions. This process consisted of three stages. The first stage aimed to select and explore a field of science. This field would be the area for which to identify outputs, such as units of analysis, variables, and objectives. The second stage aimed to write structured research questions, taking into account the outputs of the first stage. In general, the structure of research questions starts with interrogative adverbs (e.g., what and when), auxiliary verbs (e.g., is there and are there), or other auxiliaries (e.g., do, does, and did); followed by nouns nominalized from verbs of research objectives, such as association, correlation, influence, causation, prediction, application; research variables (e.g., risk factors, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety); and units of analysis (e.g., patients with hypertension and general hospitals). The third stage aimed to assess the quality and feasibility of the research questions against a set of criteria such as relevance, originality, generalizability, measurability, communicability, availability of resources, and ethical issues. By following the proposed simplified process, novice researchers may learn how to write structured research questions of sound scientific value. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10229003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Innovative Healthcare Institute |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-102290032023-05-31 How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions Ubeda, Sergio Ramón Gutiérrez Glob J Qual Saf Healthc Health Policy Analysis and Perspective The objective of this article is to describe a simplified process for building and assessing the quality of healthcare-related research questions. This process consisted of three stages. The first stage aimed to select and explore a field of science. This field would be the area for which to identify outputs, such as units of analysis, variables, and objectives. The second stage aimed to write structured research questions, taking into account the outputs of the first stage. In general, the structure of research questions starts with interrogative adverbs (e.g., what and when), auxiliary verbs (e.g., is there and are there), or other auxiliaries (e.g., do, does, and did); followed by nouns nominalized from verbs of research objectives, such as association, correlation, influence, causation, prediction, application; research variables (e.g., risk factors, efficiency, effectiveness, and safety); and units of analysis (e.g., patients with hypertension and general hospitals). The third stage aimed to assess the quality and feasibility of the research questions against a set of criteria such as relevance, originality, generalizability, measurability, communicability, availability of resources, and ethical issues. By following the proposed simplified process, novice researchers may learn how to write structured research questions of sound scientific value. Innovative Healthcare Institute 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10229003/ /pubmed/37260836 http://dx.doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-21-17 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is published under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Analysis and Perspective Ubeda, Sergio Ramón Gutiérrez How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions |
title | How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions |
title_full | How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions |
title_fullStr | How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions |
title_short | How to Build and Assess the Quality of Healthcare-Related Research Questions |
title_sort | how to build and assess the quality of healthcare-related research questions |
topic | Health Policy Analysis and Perspective |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10229003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37260836 http://dx.doi.org/10.36401/JQSH-21-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ubedasergioramongutierrez howtobuildandassessthequalityofhealthcarerelatedresearchquestions |